The good, the bad and the grey areas of care: a review of the anthropology of care in health care

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Care and Caring Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1332/239788221x16890865753857
Erwin Schweitzer, Margret Jaeger
{"title":"The good, the bad and the grey areas of care: a review of the anthropology of care in health care","authors":"Erwin Schweitzer, Margret Jaeger","doi":"10.1332/239788221x16890865753857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current societal transformations in health care and other fields of care have led to an enormous increase in the number of publications in the anthropology of care. Yet, the field turns out to be fragmented and complex. To provide some orientation, we present results of a scoping review on empirical research on paid care work in health-care settings. We structure our findings according to whether the authors tend to focus on ‘good’, ‘bad’ or ‘grey’ areas of care. Anthropology might contribute to the field of care studies by making aspects of care visible that often remain concealed otherwise.","PeriodicalId":43660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care and Caring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care and Caring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221x16890865753857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current societal transformations in health care and other fields of care have led to an enormous increase in the number of publications in the anthropology of care. Yet, the field turns out to be fragmented and complex. To provide some orientation, we present results of a scoping review on empirical research on paid care work in health-care settings. We structure our findings according to whether the authors tend to focus on ‘good’, ‘bad’ or ‘grey’ areas of care. Anthropology might contribute to the field of care studies by making aspects of care visible that often remain concealed otherwise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健的好、坏和灰色地带:医疗保健人类学综述
当前医疗保健和其他护理领域的社会变革导致护理人类学出版物的数量大幅增加。然而,事实证明,这个领域是分散而复杂的。为了提供一些指导,我们介绍了对医疗保健环境中有偿护理工作的实证研究的范围审查结果。我们根据作者是否倾向于关注“好”、“坏”或“灰色”护理领域来构建我们的研究结果。人类学可能有助于护理研究领域,使护理的各个方面可见,否则往往会被掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Care and Caring
International Journal of Care and Caring SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of community wellbeing programmes and the reported outcomes for young carers Variety in carers’ views regarding care responsibilities from an intersectional perspective Peer support for people with dementia: an exploratory study of two peer support models (In)Forming care: negotiating tensions in everyday information work in dementia care Recognition of informal carers: a solidarity-based approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1