Delivering life, delivering death: Reaper drones, hysteria and maternity

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Security Dialogue Pub Date : 2021-04-27 DOI:10.1177/0967010621997628
Lindsay C Clark
{"title":"Delivering life, delivering death: Reaper drones, hysteria and maternity","authors":"Lindsay C Clark","doi":"10.1177/0967010621997628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like all warfare, drone warfare is deeply gendered. This article explores how this military technology sediments or disrupts existing conceptualizations of women who kill in war. The article using the concept of motherhood as a narrative organizing trope and introduces a ‘fictional’ account of motherhood and drone warfare and data from a ‘real life’ account of a pregnant British Reaper operator. The article considers the way trauma experienced by Reaper drone crews is reported in a highly gendered manner, reflecting the way women’s violence is generally constructed as resulting from personal failures, lost love and irrational emotionality. This irrational emotionality is tied to a long history of medicalizing women’s bodies and psychologies because of their reproductive capacities and, specifically, their wombs – explored in this article under the historico-medical term of ‘hysteria’. The article argues that where barriers to women’s participation in warfare have, in the past, hinged upon their (argued) physical weakness, and where technology renders these barriers obsolete, there remains the tenacious myth that women are emotionally incapable of conducting lethal operations – a myth based on (mis)conceptions of the ‘naturalness’ of motherhood and the feminine capacity to give life.","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":"15 1","pages":"75 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0967010621997628","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010621997628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Like all warfare, drone warfare is deeply gendered. This article explores how this military technology sediments or disrupts existing conceptualizations of women who kill in war. The article using the concept of motherhood as a narrative organizing trope and introduces a ‘fictional’ account of motherhood and drone warfare and data from a ‘real life’ account of a pregnant British Reaper operator. The article considers the way trauma experienced by Reaper drone crews is reported in a highly gendered manner, reflecting the way women’s violence is generally constructed as resulting from personal failures, lost love and irrational emotionality. This irrational emotionality is tied to a long history of medicalizing women’s bodies and psychologies because of their reproductive capacities and, specifically, their wombs – explored in this article under the historico-medical term of ‘hysteria’. The article argues that where barriers to women’s participation in warfare have, in the past, hinged upon their (argued) physical weakness, and where technology renders these barriers obsolete, there remains the tenacious myth that women are emotionally incapable of conducting lethal operations – a myth based on (mis)conceptions of the ‘naturalness’ of motherhood and the feminine capacity to give life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传递生命,传递死亡:收割者无人机、歇斯底里和母性
与所有战争一样,无人机战争也有着深刻的性别歧视。这篇文章探讨了这项军事技术是如何沉淀或颠覆现有的战争中杀人女性的概念的。这篇文章使用母亲的概念作为叙事组织比喻,介绍了母亲和无人机战争的“虚构”描述,以及一名怀孕的英国收割者操作员的“现实生活”描述中的数据。这篇文章认为,“收割者”无人机机组人员所经历的创伤是以高度性别化的方式报道的,反映了女性暴力通常被认为是由个人失败、失去爱和非理性情绪造成的。这种非理性的情绪与长期以来对女性的身体和心理进行医学治疗有关,因为她们的生殖能力,特别是子宫——本文在“歇斯底里”这一历史医学术语下进行了探讨。文章认为,在过去,妇女参与战争的障碍取决于她们(有争议的)身体弱点,而技术使这些障碍过时,仍然存在着一个顽固的神话,即女性在情感上无法进行致命的手术&这个神话基于对母性“自然性”和女性赋予生命能力的(错误的)概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Qualifying deportation: How police translation of 'dangerous foreign criminals' led to expansive deportation practices in Spain. Insecurity, deportability and authority ‘My body is my piece of land’: Indebted deportation among undocumented migrant sex workers from Thailand and Nigeria in Europe ‘Women helping women’: Deploying gender in US counterinsurgency wars in Iraq and Afghanistan Everyday security and the newspaper obituary: Reproducing and contesting terrorism discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1