Murky waters: Incident at Loch Ness, Grizzly Man, and Herzogian notions of truth

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION New Review of Film and Television Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1080/17400309.2023.2214052
Brandon West
{"title":"Murky waters: Incident at Loch Ness, Grizzly Man, and Herzogian notions of truth","authors":"Brandon West","doi":"10.1080/17400309.2023.2214052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Werner Herzog avers that cinema reveals a truth beyond mere fact, a truth he calls ‘ecstatic truth’. The film that offers the clearest view of this conception, the mockumentary Incident at Loch Ness (2004), remains understudied and obscure. In Incident, Herzog plays a fictionalized version of himself who is making a documentary about the Loch Ness monster. This fictional version of Herzog shares the real Herzog’s filmmaking philosophy, a philosophy Incident lays bare for study: namely, Incident reveals how the pursuit of ecstatic truth takes us to the limits of human understanding. While Incident helps us explore the concept of ecstatic truth, I argue it also helps us understand much of Herzog’s oeuvre, including 2005’s Grizzly Man. In this paper, therefore, I analyze ecstatic truth as presented in Incident and apply that understanding to Grizzly Man and its controversial tape scene. Examining said scene through the lens of the ecstatic truth will, I argue, not only garner us fuller insight into Herzog’s films, but will also shed light on the effects of Herzog’s controversial choice to not play the tape of Timothy Treadwell’s death in Grizzly Man.","PeriodicalId":43549,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","volume":"32 12","pages":"567 - 586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2023.2214052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Werner Herzog avers that cinema reveals a truth beyond mere fact, a truth he calls ‘ecstatic truth’. The film that offers the clearest view of this conception, the mockumentary Incident at Loch Ness (2004), remains understudied and obscure. In Incident, Herzog plays a fictionalized version of himself who is making a documentary about the Loch Ness monster. This fictional version of Herzog shares the real Herzog’s filmmaking philosophy, a philosophy Incident lays bare for study: namely, Incident reveals how the pursuit of ecstatic truth takes us to the limits of human understanding. While Incident helps us explore the concept of ecstatic truth, I argue it also helps us understand much of Herzog’s oeuvre, including 2005’s Grizzly Man. In this paper, therefore, I analyze ecstatic truth as presented in Incident and apply that understanding to Grizzly Man and its controversial tape scene. Examining said scene through the lens of the ecstatic truth will, I argue, not only garner us fuller insight into Herzog’s films, but will also shed light on the effects of Herzog’s controversial choice to not play the tape of Timothy Treadwell’s death in Grizzly Man.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗的水域:尼斯湖事件,灰熊人,和赫尔佐格的真理观念
维尔纳·赫尔佐格断言,电影揭示了一种超越事实的真理,他称之为“狂喜的真理”。伪纪录片《尼斯湖事件》(2004)对这一概念提供了最清晰的视角,但它仍未得到充分研究,也不为人所知。在《事件》中,赫尔佐格扮演了一个虚构的自己,他正在制作一部关于尼斯湖水怪的纪录片。这个虚构版本的赫尔佐格分享了真实的赫尔佐格的电影制作哲学,这是《事件》所揭示的哲学:即,《事件》揭示了对狂喜真理的追求如何将我们带到了人类理解的极限。虽然《事件》帮助我们探索了狂喜真相的概念,但我认为它也帮助我们理解了赫尔佐格的大部分作品,包括2005年的《灰熊人》。因此,在本文中,我分析了事件中呈现的狂喜真相,并将这种理解应用于灰熊人及其备受争议的磁带场景。我认为,通过狂喜的真相来审视上述场景,不仅能让我们更全面地了解赫尔佐格的电影,还能揭示赫尔佐格在《灰熊人》中不播放蒂莫西·特德韦尔死亡的录像带这一有争议的选择的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
The Australian film revival: 1970s, 1980s, and beyond Transformational ethics of film: thinking the cinemakeover in the film-philosophy debate A note of introduction Starmaker: David O. Selznick and the production of stars in the Hollywood studio system Mediating the elemental: an immaterialist ethics for ecomaterialist media theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1