Which forest-risk commodities imported to the UK have the highest overseas impacts? A rapid evidence synthesis

Amy Molotoks, C. West
{"title":"Which forest-risk commodities imported to the UK have the highest overseas impacts? A rapid evidence synthesis","authors":"Amy Molotoks, C. West","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14306.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Commodity-driven deforestation is a major driver of forest loss worldwide, and globalisation has increased the disconnect between producer and consumer countries. Recent due-diligence legislation aiming to improve supply chain sustainability covers major forest-risk commodities. However, the evidence base for specific commodities included within policy needs assessing to ensure effective reduction of embedded deforestation. Methods: We conducted a rapid evidence synthesis in October 2020 using three databases; Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, to assess the literature and identify commodities with the highest deforestation risk linked to UK imports. Inclusion criteria include publication in the past 10 years and studies that didn’t link commodity consumption to impacts or to the UK were excluded. The development of a review protocol was used to minimise bias and critical appraisal of underlying data and methods in studies was conducted in order to assess the uncertainties around results.   Results: From a total of 318 results, 17 studies were included in the final synthesis. These studies used various methodologies and input data, yet there is broad alignment on commodities, confirming that those included in due diligence legislation have a high deforestation risk. Soy, palm oil, and beef were identified as critical, with their production being concentrated in just a few global locations. However, there are also emerging commodities that have a high deforestation risk but are not included in legislation, such as sugar and coffee. These commodities are much less extensively studied in the literature and may warrant further research and consideration.   Conclusion: Policy recommendations in the selected studies suggests further strengthening of the UK due diligence legislation is needed. In particular, the provision of incentives for uptake of policies and wider stakeholder engagement, as well as continual review of commodities included to ensure a reduction in the UK’s overseas deforestation footprint.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":"109 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14306.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Commodity-driven deforestation is a major driver of forest loss worldwide, and globalisation has increased the disconnect between producer and consumer countries. Recent due-diligence legislation aiming to improve supply chain sustainability covers major forest-risk commodities. However, the evidence base for specific commodities included within policy needs assessing to ensure effective reduction of embedded deforestation. Methods: We conducted a rapid evidence synthesis in October 2020 using three databases; Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, to assess the literature and identify commodities with the highest deforestation risk linked to UK imports. Inclusion criteria include publication in the past 10 years and studies that didn’t link commodity consumption to impacts or to the UK were excluded. The development of a review protocol was used to minimise bias and critical appraisal of underlying data and methods in studies was conducted in order to assess the uncertainties around results.   Results: From a total of 318 results, 17 studies were included in the final synthesis. These studies used various methodologies and input data, yet there is broad alignment on commodities, confirming that those included in due diligence legislation have a high deforestation risk. Soy, palm oil, and beef were identified as critical, with their production being concentrated in just a few global locations. However, there are also emerging commodities that have a high deforestation risk but are not included in legislation, such as sugar and coffee. These commodities are much less extensively studied in the literature and may warrant further research and consideration.   Conclusion: Policy recommendations in the selected studies suggests further strengthening of the UK due diligence legislation is needed. In particular, the provision of incentives for uptake of policies and wider stakeholder engagement, as well as continual review of commodities included to ensure a reduction in the UK’s overseas deforestation footprint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些进口到英国的森林风险商品对海外的影响最大?快速证据合成
背景:商品驱动的森林砍伐是全球森林损失的主要驱动因素,全球化加剧了生产国和消费国之间的脱节。最近旨在提高供应链可持续性的尽职调查立法涵盖了主要的森林风险商品。然而,政策需要评估具体商品的证据基础,以确保有效减少根深蒂固的森林砍伐。方法:我们在2020年10月使用三个数据库进行了快速证据综合;谷歌学者、科学网和Scopus,以评估文献并确定与英国进口相关的森林砍伐风险最高的商品。纳入标准包括过去10年的出版物,没有将商品消费与影响或英国联系起来的研究被排除在外。审查方案的制定旨在最大限度地减少偏差,并对研究中的基础数据和方法进行了关键评估,以评估结果的不确定性。结果:在总共318个结果中,17项研究被纳入最终合成。这些研究使用了各种方法和输入数据,但在商品方面存在广泛的一致性,证实了尽职调查立法中包含的商品具有很高的毁林风险。大豆、棕榈油和牛肉被确定为关键产品,它们的生产仅集中在全球少数几个地区。然而,也有一些新兴商品具有很高的森林砍伐风险,但未被纳入立法,如糖和咖啡。这些商品在文献中的研究要少得多,可能需要进一步的研究和考虑。结论:选定研究中的政策建议表明,需要进一步加强英国的尽职调查立法。特别是,为政策的实施和更广泛的利益相关者参与提供激励措施,以及对包括在内的商品进行持续审查,以确保减少英国的海外森林砍伐足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradoxes and dilemmas of responsible leadership in the mining industries of emerging economies – it is complex Secondary school teachers' perception of quality management practices in Ethiopia: Implications for quality education for all On the global emergence of responsible leadership: purpose and social identity Estimating annual average daily traffic (AADT) data on low-volume roads with the cokriging technique and census/population data Family violence screening and disclosure response: A public mental health service consumer survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1