“The Social Antagonism between Whiteness and Antiracism: How and Why White Antiracists lose their Whiteness”

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1515/zfsoz-2022-0005
M. Hughey, M. Schmitt
{"title":"“The Social Antagonism between Whiteness and Antiracism: How and Why White Antiracists lose their Whiteness”","authors":"M. Hughey, M. Schmitt","doi":"10.1515/zfsoz-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article depicts two cases of “lost Whiteness” and unintentional racial “passing.” Based on years of ethnographic research, we present the story of two White people who – largely because of their truly-determined commitment to racial justice activism – were thought by others as being or becoming Persons of Color. These activists were not trying to pass. Rather, they are manifestations of a “reverse racial pass,” defined as “any instance in which a person legally recognized as white effectively functions as a non-white person in any quarter of the social arena” (Harper 1998: 382). These two cases illumine the relationships between the ongoing, negotiated process of racial identity formation and antiracist activism in the United States. We argue that Whiteness and antiracism are enmeshed in a paradoxical dynamic: Social emphases on antiracist activism enabled the reception of White activists as People of Color, while conversely, emphases on activists’ Whiteness enabled observers to doubt both their moral commitments and intellectual prowess toward antiracist activism. This dynamic gestures toward the necessity to examine the symbolic and discursive factors undergirding the social construction of “race”, which in turn destabilizes both layperson and scholarly focus on physical appearance and racialization.","PeriodicalId":47292,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2022-0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article depicts two cases of “lost Whiteness” and unintentional racial “passing.” Based on years of ethnographic research, we present the story of two White people who – largely because of their truly-determined commitment to racial justice activism – were thought by others as being or becoming Persons of Color. These activists were not trying to pass. Rather, they are manifestations of a “reverse racial pass,” defined as “any instance in which a person legally recognized as white effectively functions as a non-white person in any quarter of the social arena” (Harper 1998: 382). These two cases illumine the relationships between the ongoing, negotiated process of racial identity formation and antiracist activism in the United States. We argue that Whiteness and antiracism are enmeshed in a paradoxical dynamic: Social emphases on antiracist activism enabled the reception of White activists as People of Color, while conversely, emphases on activists’ Whiteness enabled observers to doubt both their moral commitments and intellectual prowess toward antiracist activism. This dynamic gestures toward the necessity to examine the symbolic and discursive factors undergirding the social construction of “race”, which in turn destabilizes both layperson and scholarly focus on physical appearance and racialization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“白人和反种族主义之间的社会对立:白人反种族主义者如何以及为什么失去白人”
摘要这篇文章描述了两个“失去白人”和无意中的种族“逝去”的案例。基于多年的民族志研究,我们讲述了两个白人的故事,他们主要是因为他们真正坚定地致力于种族正义行动主义,被其他人认为是或成为有色人种。这些活动人士并没有试图通过。相反,他们是“反向种族通行证”的表现,定义为“法律上承认为白人的人在社会舞台的任何方面都有效地扮演非白人的角色的任何情况”(Harper 1998:382)。这两个案例揭示了美国正在进行的、经过谈判的种族身份形成过程与反种族主义激进主义之间的关系。我们认为,白人和反种族主义陷入了一种矛盾的动态中:社会对反种族主义激进主义的强调使白人活动人士成为有色人种,而相反,对活动人士白人的强调使观察者怀疑他们对反种族主义主义的道德承诺和智力能力。这种动态表明,有必要研究支撑“种族”社会建构的象征性和话语性因素,这反过来又破坏了普通人和学术界对外表和种族化的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Soziologie veröffentlicht Beiträge aus allen Bereichen der Soziologie. Sie erscheint sechs Mal im Jahr und veröffentlicht pro Heft in der Regel vier Forschungsartikel, bisweilen aber auch kürzere Forschungsnotizen und soziologische Essays. In unserem Online-Heftarchiv, das sich zur Zeit im Aufbau befindet, erhalten unsere Online-Abonnenten Zugriff auf alle Inhalte der Zeitschrift für Soziologie. Der Zugriff auf Artikel, deren Veröffentlichungsdatum mindestens zwei Jahre zurückliegt, ist allen Nutzern gestattet. Von unseren aktuellen Heften ist jeweils ein Artikel pro Heft vom Tage des Erscheinens an frei zugänglich.
期刊最新文献
Effizienz und soziale Ungleichheit in strikt leistungsdifferenzierenden Bildungssystemen. Eine kritische Betrachtung des Model of Ability Tracking (MoAbiT) Die Zukunft sozialer Rechte Multiple Differenzierung und Wandel. Der Beitrag der evolutionär-institutionalistischen Perspektive Distinct Boundaries? Preferences of Immigrants’ Descendants Regarding Partnerships with Recent Refugees from Syria and Afghanistan in Germany Assessing the Importance of Sample Choice and Selectivity for Sex Segregation in College Majors: A Replication of Ochsenfeld (2016)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1