Intraoperative Physician Assessment during total hip arthroplasty correlates with DXA parameters

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101393
David P. Martin II MD (Primary Author) , Samuel S. Lake MD Physician (Contributing Author) , Michael A. Behun MD (Contributing Author) , Diane Krueger BS, CBDT (Contributing Author) , Radius Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) , David Hennessy MD (Contributing Author) , Brian Nickel MD (Contributing Author)
{"title":"Intraoperative Physician Assessment during total hip arthroplasty correlates with DXA parameters","authors":"David P. Martin II MD (Primary Author) ,&nbsp;Samuel S. Lake MD Physician (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Michael A. Behun MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Diane Krueger BS, CBDT (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Radius Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;David Hennessy MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Brian Nickel MD (Contributing Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Aims</h3><p>To evaluate Intraoperative Physician Assessment (IPA) during total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a quantitative measure of bone status based on tactile assessment. IPA was compared to DXA-measured bone mineral density (BMD), 3D-Shaper parameters, and radiographic indices to assess its validity for evaluating bone status.</p></div><div><h3>Rationale/Background</h3><p>The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) Official Positions acknowledge the orthopedic surgeons’ ability to assess bone intraoperatively and recommend bone assessment for patients with poor bone quality. Currently, there is no validated method to quantify bone status intraoperatively and correlate it with DXA-parameters. This study sought to fill that void.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis identified patients undergoing primary THA who had IPA recorded in the operative report<span> and a DXA within 2 years prior to surgery. Patients were excluded if they had prior surgery on the involved hip. 60 patients (64 hips) operated on by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons were included. Intraoperatively, surgeons subjectively assessed bone quality on a 5-point scale based on tactile feedback. This scale defined 1 as excellent and 5 as poor, as noted in Table 1. IPA score was compared to DXA BMD and T-score, 3D Shaper measurements, WHO classification, FRAX scores, radiographic Dorr classification and Cortical Index. IPA was correlated with bone parameters using the Pearson method for continuous variables and Spearman method for ordinal variables.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Mean (SD) patient age and BMI were 69.1 (8.5) years and 27.7 (5.9) kg/m2 respectively; 54 (84%) were female. Patient demographic data and bone parameters were similar between surgeons. Mean IPA was 2.95 ± 0.98 with no difference between surgeons (p = 0.121). There was a moderate correlation between IPA score and total hip BMD (r = 0.386, p = 0.002) and 3D shaper measurements, including trabecular volumetric BMD (r = -0.326, p = 0.010), cortical surface BMD (r = -0.347, p = 0.006), and cortical thickness (r = -0.381, p = 0.002). There was a strong correlation (all p &lt; 0.001) between IPA score and lowest T-score (r = -0.485), WHO classification (r = 0.528), and FRAX major and hip fracture scores (r = 0.501, 0.622). All patients with below average or poor IPA score had </span>osteopenia<span> or osteoporosis by DXA.</span></p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>IPA during THA is a simple, valuable tool for quantifying bone status based on tactile feedback. This information can be used to identify patients with poor bone quality that may benefit from bone health evaluation and treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 101393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023000434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Aims

To evaluate Intraoperative Physician Assessment (IPA) during total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a quantitative measure of bone status based on tactile assessment. IPA was compared to DXA-measured bone mineral density (BMD), 3D-Shaper parameters, and radiographic indices to assess its validity for evaluating bone status.

Rationale/Background

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) Official Positions acknowledge the orthopedic surgeons’ ability to assess bone intraoperatively and recommend bone assessment for patients with poor bone quality. Currently, there is no validated method to quantify bone status intraoperatively and correlate it with DXA-parameters. This study sought to fill that void.

Methods

A retrospective analysis identified patients undergoing primary THA who had IPA recorded in the operative report and a DXA within 2 years prior to surgery. Patients were excluded if they had prior surgery on the involved hip. 60 patients (64 hips) operated on by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons were included. Intraoperatively, surgeons subjectively assessed bone quality on a 5-point scale based on tactile feedback. This scale defined 1 as excellent and 5 as poor, as noted in Table 1. IPA score was compared to DXA BMD and T-score, 3D Shaper measurements, WHO classification, FRAX scores, radiographic Dorr classification and Cortical Index. IPA was correlated with bone parameters using the Pearson method for continuous variables and Spearman method for ordinal variables.

Results

Mean (SD) patient age and BMI were 69.1 (8.5) years and 27.7 (5.9) kg/m2 respectively; 54 (84%) were female. Patient demographic data and bone parameters were similar between surgeons. Mean IPA was 2.95 ± 0.98 with no difference between surgeons (p = 0.121). There was a moderate correlation between IPA score and total hip BMD (r = 0.386, p = 0.002) and 3D shaper measurements, including trabecular volumetric BMD (r = -0.326, p = 0.010), cortical surface BMD (r = -0.347, p = 0.006), and cortical thickness (r = -0.381, p = 0.002). There was a strong correlation (all p < 0.001) between IPA score and lowest T-score (r = -0.485), WHO classification (r = 0.528), and FRAX major and hip fracture scores (r = 0.501, 0.622). All patients with below average or poor IPA score had osteopenia or osteoporosis by DXA.

Implications

IPA during THA is a simple, valuable tool for quantifying bone status based on tactile feedback. This information can be used to identify patients with poor bone quality that may benefit from bone health evaluation and treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术中医师评估与DXA参数相关
目的/目的评价全髋关节置换术(THA)中术中医师评估(IPA)作为基于触觉评估的骨状态的定量测量。将IPA与dxa测量的骨密度(BMD)、3D-Shaper参数和x线摄影指标进行比较,以评估其评估骨骼状态的有效性。理论基础/背景国际临床密度测量学会(ISCD)官方职位认可骨科医生在术中评估骨的能力,并建议对骨质量差的患者进行骨评估。目前,还没有有效的方法来量化术中骨状态并将其与dxa参数相关联。这项研究试图填补这一空白。方法回顾性分析手术报告中记录IPA和术前2年内DXA的原发性THA患者。如果患者之前有过相关髋关节手术,则排除在外。60例患者(64髋)手术由2个奖学金培训的关节置换外科医生。术中,外科医生根据触觉反馈主观地以5分制评估骨质量。该量表将1定义为优秀,5定义为差,如表1所示。IPA评分与DXA BMD和t评分、3D Shaper测量、WHO分级、FRAX评分、影像学Dorr分级和皮质指数进行比较。使用Pearson方法对连续变量和Spearman方法对有序变量进行IPA与骨参数的相关性分析。结果患者平均年龄(SD)为69.1(8.5)岁,BMI为27.7 (5.9)kg/m2;54例(84%)为女性。两名外科医生的患者人口统计数据和骨骼参数相似。不同术者间的平均IPA为2.95±0.98 (p = 0.121)。有一个温和的音标之间的相关性分数和总髋部BMD (r = 0.386,p = 0.002)和3 d牛头刨床测量,包括小梁体积BMD (r = -0.326,p = 0.010),皮质表面BMD (r = -0.347,p = 0.006),和皮质厚度(r = -0.381,p = 0.002)。有很强的相关性(所有p <0.001) IPA评分与最低t评分(r = -0.485)、WHO分级(r = 0.528)、FRAX主要骨折和髋部骨折评分(r = 0.501,0.622)之间的差异(r = 0.501,0.622)。所有IPA评分低于平均或较差的患者均有骨质减少或骨质疏松症。在THA期间,sipa是一种基于触觉反馈来量化骨状态的简单而有价值的工具。该信息可用于识别骨质量差的患者,这些患者可能受益于骨健康评估和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Follow-up bone mineral density testing: 2023 official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry" Journal of clinical densitometry: Assessment and management of musculoskeletal health vol 27(1), 101440,2024. Predicting bone mineral content from smartphone digital anthropometrics: evaluation of an existing application and the development of new prediction models Moving towards an equitable future: Rethinking the use of race in pediatric densitometry Comparison of the Effect of Selective Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors on Bone Mineral Density with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Healthy Controls Opportunistic Screening for Low Bone Mineral Density in Routine Computed Tomography Scans: A Brazilian Validation Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1