Angela Mariani, Improvisation and Inventio in the Performance of Medieval Music: A Practical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. xxi + 232 pp. £71 (hardback) / £18.99 (paperback). ISBN 978 0 19 063117 8 (hardback), 978 0 19 063118 5 (paperback).
{"title":"Angela Mariani, Improvisation and Inventio in the Performance of Medieval Music: A Practical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. xxi + 232 pp. £71 (hardback) / £18.99 (paperback). ISBN 978 0 19 063117 8 (hardback), 978 0 19 063118 5 (paperback).","authors":"J. Llewellyn","doi":"10.1017/S0961137120000030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"levels of formality: the size and spacing of his diamond-shaped noteheads could be adjusted, or abandoned altogether in favour ofmore quickly executed teardrop shapes, yet enough remains constant in De Blauwe’s work to convince us that his work pervades these sources. De Blauwe must also have been responsible for the calligraphic initials in MSS 1438–1440. Jas does not suggest this, but one of the weapons in De Blauwe’s scribal armoury when executing the more elaborate initials (see the cover of Jas’s book, and his Plate 16 on p. 103) may have been a broad-nibbed pen with a nick excised towards the right edge of the nib, producing at a single stroke a broad line on the left and a parallel narrow line on the right. We must be grateful to Dr Jas for presenting his work in such elegant English, and his publisher has served him reasonably well. It is regrettable that a decision was taken to reproduce the watermarks (in Appendix 3) smaller than their actual size, since this makes potential comparison with other examples much more difficult (and this is all the more frustrating when the list of concordant sources – important as it is – is presented on pp. 349–93 in a much larger typesize and a more extravagant layout than necessary). The proofreader might perhaps have spotted twenty or so occurrences of ‘epynomous’ (sic) in the manuscript inventories, not to mention some of the stranger end-of-line hyphenations (‘notehe-ads’, pp. 111, 116; ‘semim-inims’, p. 131). But, of course, none of this detracts from the value of Jas’s important and thorough research and his impressive presentation of it in this book.","PeriodicalId":41539,"journal":{"name":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","volume":"54 1","pages":"92 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137120000030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137120000030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
levels of formality: the size and spacing of his diamond-shaped noteheads could be adjusted, or abandoned altogether in favour ofmore quickly executed teardrop shapes, yet enough remains constant in De Blauwe’s work to convince us that his work pervades these sources. De Blauwe must also have been responsible for the calligraphic initials in MSS 1438–1440. Jas does not suggest this, but one of the weapons in De Blauwe’s scribal armoury when executing the more elaborate initials (see the cover of Jas’s book, and his Plate 16 on p. 103) may have been a broad-nibbed pen with a nick excised towards the right edge of the nib, producing at a single stroke a broad line on the left and a parallel narrow line on the right. We must be grateful to Dr Jas for presenting his work in such elegant English, and his publisher has served him reasonably well. It is regrettable that a decision was taken to reproduce the watermarks (in Appendix 3) smaller than their actual size, since this makes potential comparison with other examples much more difficult (and this is all the more frustrating when the list of concordant sources – important as it is – is presented on pp. 349–93 in a much larger typesize and a more extravagant layout than necessary). The proofreader might perhaps have spotted twenty or so occurrences of ‘epynomous’ (sic) in the manuscript inventories, not to mention some of the stranger end-of-line hyphenations (‘notehe-ads’, pp. 111, 116; ‘semim-inims’, p. 131). But, of course, none of this detracts from the value of Jas’s important and thorough research and his impressive presentation of it in this book.
期刊介绍:
Plainsong & Medieval Music is published twice a year in association with the Plainsong and Medieval Music Society and Cantus Planus, study group of the International Musicological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of medieval music: Eastern and Western chant, secular lyric, music theory, palaeography, performance practice, and medieval polyphony, both sacred and secular, as well as the history of musical institutions. The chronological scope of the journal extends from late antiquity to the early Renaissance and to the present day in the case of chant. In addition to book reviews in each issue, a comprehensive bibliography of chant research and a discography of recent and re-issued plainchant recordings appear annually.