(Forgotten) Landscape of Imperial War Memories in a Colonial City: Hong Kong's Cenotaph and Beyond (1920s – 1960s)

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Chinese Historical Review Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174
L. Pan
{"title":"(Forgotten) Landscape of Imperial War Memories in a Colonial City: Hong Kong's Cenotaph and Beyond (1920s – 1960s)","authors":"L. Pan","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the spatial landscape of Hong Kong's earliest imperial war monument, the Cenotaph, from the city's early colonial past to the 1960s. Hong Kong's Cenotaph, which is an almost exact replica of London's Whitehall Cenotaph, reveals how the British Empire established its imperial visual network in its colonies in the early 20th century. However, the prewar visual representation of the royal authorities through the statues of royal members in the colony's central square was replaced by politically neutral designs for civic use after the end of WWII. Through the exploration of the change of meaning of this monumental space in relation to its neighboring environment, I argue that the end of WWII, the social upheavals in the 1960s and the consequent “depoliticization” of British colonial rule have transformed the early war commemorative artefacts in Hong Kong, marginalizing them in the city's major narrative.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"20 2","pages":"93 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research investigates the spatial landscape of Hong Kong's earliest imperial war monument, the Cenotaph, from the city's early colonial past to the 1960s. Hong Kong's Cenotaph, which is an almost exact replica of London's Whitehall Cenotaph, reveals how the British Empire established its imperial visual network in its colonies in the early 20th century. However, the prewar visual representation of the royal authorities through the statues of royal members in the colony's central square was replaced by politically neutral designs for civic use after the end of WWII. Through the exploration of the change of meaning of this monumental space in relation to its neighboring environment, I argue that the end of WWII, the social upheavals in the 1960s and the consequent “depoliticization” of British colonial rule have transformed the early war commemorative artefacts in Hong Kong, marginalizing them in the city's major narrative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(被遗忘)殖民城市的帝国战争记忆景观:香港的纪念碑及其后(1920 - 1960)
本研究调查了香港最早的帝国战争纪念碑纪念碑从殖民地早期到20世纪60年代的空间景观。香港的纪念碑几乎完全是伦敦白厅纪念碑的复制品,揭示了20世纪初大英帝国是如何在其殖民地建立帝国视觉网络的。然而,二战结束后,通过殖民地中央广场上的王室成员雕像对战前王室当局的视觉表现被政治中立的民用设计所取代。通过探索这一纪念性空间相对于其周边环境的意义变化,我认为二战结束、20世纪60年代的社会动荡以及随之而来的英国殖民统治的“非政治化”改变了香港早期战争纪念文物,使其在城市的主要叙事中被边缘化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Chinese Historical Review is a fully refereed and vigorously edited journal of history and social sciences that is published biannually. The journal publishes original research on the history of China in every period, China''s historical relations with the world, the historical experiences of the overseas Chinese, as well as comparative and transnational studies of history and social sciences. Its Forum section features interviews with leading scholars on issues concerning history and the historical profession. Its Book Reviews section introduces recent historical scholarship published in English, Chinese, and other languages. The journal is published on behalf of The Chinese Historians in the United States, Inc. (CHUS), which was established in 1987 and is an affiliated society of The American Historical Association (AHA) and The Association for Asian Studies (AAS). The journal began its publication in 1987 under the title Historian. In 1989 it was registered with the Library of Congress and began its publication as a refereed journal of history under the title Chinese Historians. It adopted the current title in 2004.
期刊最新文献
Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800-1600 Arise, Africa! Roar, China! : Black and Chinese Citizens of the World in the Twentieth Century What Concerned Chiang? A Survey and Analysis of Chiang Kai-Shek’s Wartime Diaries The Contribution of Tung Wah Hospital to the Repatriation of Deceased Chinese Expatriates in the Early Twentieth Century Beyond the Wall: Mapping Christian Fundamentalism in Hunan During the 1920s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1