Retrospective Review of Periurethral Lymph Node Dissection in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Charla Holdren, Christopher Pulford, Kevin T. Keating, David Peifer, R. Eames, S. Wisnewski, T. Maatman
{"title":"Retrospective Review of Periurethral Lymph Node Dissection in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer","authors":"Charla Holdren, Christopher Pulford, Kevin T. Keating, David Peifer, R. Eames, S. Wisnewski, T. Maatman","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of positive periurethral lymph nodes during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to investigate the relationship between secondary end points of tumor staging, PSA, and Gleason score.\n \n \n \n This study is a retrospective review of 1177 RARPs performed from October 2011 to February 2022. Using pathology reports, the study population was condensed to 58 patients who had periurethral lymph node tissue. This population was then analyzed for the prevalence of malignant tissue in the specimen. A secondary analysis was performed for data on PSA, Gleason score (preoperative and postoperative), and tumor-nodes-metastases (TNM) staging.\n \n \n \n Retrospective analysis demonstrated 9 of 58 specimens (15.5%) to be positive for malignancy. There was a statistically significant (P < .004) correlation between lymph node status and PSA. The average PSA was 17.60 (SD = 15.54) for those with positive periurethral lymph nodes and 7.96 (SD = 6.65) for those with negative periurethral lymph nodes. There was no statistically significant association between lymph node status and preoperative Gleason scores. There was, however, a statistically significant difference across lymph node status and postoperative Gleason scores (X2 (3) = 11.09, P = .01).\n \n \n \n Positive periurethral lymph nodes demonstrated higher average PSAs, postoperative Gleason scores, and TNM staging. Further analysis is required to evaluate potential prognostic implications.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of positive periurethral lymph nodes during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to investigate the relationship between secondary end points of tumor staging, PSA, and Gleason score. This study is a retrospective review of 1177 RARPs performed from October 2011 to February 2022. Using pathology reports, the study population was condensed to 58 patients who had periurethral lymph node tissue. This population was then analyzed for the prevalence of malignant tissue in the specimen. A secondary analysis was performed for data on PSA, Gleason score (preoperative and postoperative), and tumor-nodes-metastases (TNM) staging. Retrospective analysis demonstrated 9 of 58 specimens (15.5%) to be positive for malignancy. There was a statistically significant (P < .004) correlation between lymph node status and PSA. The average PSA was 17.60 (SD = 15.54) for those with positive periurethral lymph nodes and 7.96 (SD = 6.65) for those with negative periurethral lymph nodes. There was no statistically significant association between lymph node status and preoperative Gleason scores. There was, however, a statistically significant difference across lymph node status and postoperative Gleason scores (X2 (3) = 11.09, P = .01). Positive periurethral lymph nodes demonstrated higher average PSAs, postoperative Gleason scores, and TNM staging. Further analysis is required to evaluate potential prognostic implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症尿道周围淋巴结清扫术的回顾性分析
本研究的目的是评估机器人辅助前列腺根治术(RARP)中尿道周围淋巴结阳性的发生率,并研究肿瘤分期的次要终点、PSA和Gleason评分之间的关系。本研究对2011年10月至2022年2月进行的1177次RARP进行了回顾性审查。利用病理学报告,研究人群被浓缩为58名有尿道周围淋巴结组织的患者。然后对样本中的恶性组织的患病率进行分析。对PSA、Gleason评分(术前和术后)和肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分期的数据进行了二次分析。回顾性分析显示58个标本中有9个(15.5%)为恶性肿瘤阳性。淋巴结状态与PSA之间存在统计学显著相关性(P<.004)。尿道周围淋巴结阳性者的平均PSA为17.60(SD=15.54),尿道周围淋巴淋巴结阴性者的平均SA为7.96(SD=6.65)。淋巴结状况与术前Gleason评分之间没有统计学意义的相关性。然而,淋巴结状态和术后Gleason评分之间存在统计学上的显著差异(X2(3)=11.09,P=0.01)。尿道周围淋巴结阳性显示出较高的平均PSA、术后Gleeson评分和TNM分期。需要进一步的分析来评估潜在的预后影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary Bladder Melanosis Diagnosed Simultaneously With Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review Artificial Intelligence–Generated Patient Information Videos for Partial Nephrectomy by Medical Students With Expert Validation: A Pilot Study Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease Editorial Comment: Telehealth in Urology Beyond COVID-19 Limitations of ChatGPT for Patient Education Regarding Frequently Searched Questions About Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1