From Military Masculinity toward Hybrid Masculinities: Constructing a New Sense of Manhood among Veterans Treated for PTSS

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Men and Masculinities Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI:10.1177/1097184X211038049
Gabriela Spector-Mersel, Ohad Gilbar
{"title":"From Military Masculinity toward Hybrid Masculinities: Constructing a New Sense of Manhood among Veterans Treated for PTSS","authors":"Gabriela Spector-Mersel, Ohad Gilbar","doi":"10.1177/1097184X211038049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how Israeli men who are army veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress and consequently participated in therapy engage “new masculinities” ideologies. Drawing from interview data with these veterans, we find changes in the men’s perceptions of masculinity and sense of themselves as men. They expressed this shift through criticisms of military masculinity and disassociating from the idea of man-as-fighter, disputing the sociocultural category of hegemonic masculinity, and performing practices identified as feminine. The men portrayed this movement, away from endorsing hegemonic military masculinity toward affirming “new masculinity” ideology rooted in therapeutic discourse, which emphasizes sensitivity, emotional disclosure, self-care, and seeking help, as intertwined with their mental recovery—and they attributed both to therapy. These findings suggest that new masculinity ideology embedded in therapeutic discourse, can offer men suffering from post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) a template to reaffirm their status as men—although men of a different kind—and indicate the possibilities for therapy in this endeavor. However, while the men adopted new masculinity ideologies, they also conformed to hegemonic masculinity, constructing hybrid masculinities. The study joins growing evidence that hybrid masculinities may have positive effects in enabling men to overcome the limitations of hegemonic masculinity, while also conforming to its expectations more broadly and maintaining men’s power.","PeriodicalId":47750,"journal":{"name":"Men and Masculinities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Men and Masculinities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211038049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examines how Israeli men who are army veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress and consequently participated in therapy engage “new masculinities” ideologies. Drawing from interview data with these veterans, we find changes in the men’s perceptions of masculinity and sense of themselves as men. They expressed this shift through criticisms of military masculinity and disassociating from the idea of man-as-fighter, disputing the sociocultural category of hegemonic masculinity, and performing practices identified as feminine. The men portrayed this movement, away from endorsing hegemonic military masculinity toward affirming “new masculinity” ideology rooted in therapeutic discourse, which emphasizes sensitivity, emotional disclosure, self-care, and seeking help, as intertwined with their mental recovery—and they attributed both to therapy. These findings suggest that new masculinity ideology embedded in therapeutic discourse, can offer men suffering from post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) a template to reaffirm their status as men—although men of a different kind—and indicate the possibilities for therapy in this endeavor. However, while the men adopted new masculinity ideologies, they also conformed to hegemonic masculinity, constructing hybrid masculinities. The study joins growing evidence that hybrid masculinities may have positive effects in enabling men to overcome the limitations of hegemonic masculinity, while also conforming to its expectations more broadly and maintaining men’s power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从军人男子气概到混合男子气概:创伤后应激障碍退伍军人新男子气概的建构
这项研究考察了以色列退伍军人中患有与战斗有关的创伤后应激障碍并因此参与治疗的男性如何参与“新男性主义”意识形态。根据对这些退伍军人的采访数据,我们发现男性对男子气概的看法和对自己作为男性的认识发生了变化。他们通过批评军事男子气概和脱离男人作为战士的观念来表达这种转变,对霸权男子气概的社会文化范畴提出质疑,并进行被认定为女性化的实践。这些人描述了这场运动,从支持霸权的军事男子气概转向肯定根植于治疗话语的“新男子气概”意识形态,这种意识形态强调敏感性、情感表露、自我照顾和寻求帮助,这些都与他们的精神康复交织在一起——他们把这两者都归功于治疗。这些发现表明,在治疗话语中嵌入的新的男子气概意识形态,可以为患有创伤后应激症状(PTSS)的男性提供一个模板,以重申他们作为男性的地位——尽管是不同类型的男性——并指出在这种努力中治疗的可能性。然而,他们在接受新男子气概意识形态的同时,也顺应了霸权男子气概,构建了混合型男子气概。这项研究和越来越多的证据表明,混合男子气概可能会产生积极影响,使男性能够克服霸权男子气概的局限性,同时也更广泛地符合其期望,保持男性的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Men and Masculinities presents peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical scholarship grounded in the most current theoretical perspectives within gender studies, including feminism, queer theory and multiculturalism. Using diverse methodologies, Men and Masculinities"s articles explore the evolving roles and perceptions of men across society. Complementing existing publications on women"s studies and gay and lesbian studies, Men and Masculinities helps complete the spectrum of research on gender. The journal gives scholars interested in gender vital, balanced information on the burgeoning - and often misunderstood - field of masculinities studies.
期刊最新文献
Take the Red Pill, Blame Feminism: Victimization Narratives Across the Manosphere Cut From the Same Cloth? The Problem of Male Supremacy and Deradicalization Unpacking Single Men’s Constructions of Innocent Men and Culpable Women in a #MeToo Context Reintroducing the “Tough Black Man” and Its Socio-Demographic, Race-Related, and Psychological Correlates From Hegemonic to Hybrid and Back? The Context-Adaptive Masculinity of Polish Male Migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1