Evaluation of the Maximum Cognitive Distance Per Emergency Exit Sign Colour in a Smoke-Filled Environment Simulated Using a Translucent Eye Patch

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Fire Technology Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1007/s10694-023-01474-9
Ryun-Seok Oh, Young-Chan Kim, Young-Hoon Bae, Jun-Ho Choi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Maximum Cognitive Distance Per Emergency Exit Sign Colour in a Smoke-Filled Environment Simulated Using a Translucent Eye Patch","authors":"Ryun-Seok Oh,&nbsp;Young-Chan Kim,&nbsp;Young-Hoon Bae,&nbsp;Jun-Ho Choi","doi":"10.1007/s10694-023-01474-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exit signs are intended to help occupants promptly and accurately select evacuation paths during emergencies. However, according to previous studies and accident cases, exit signs are not helpful for occupants during emergency situations, which can be attributed to limited visibility due to the smoke generated during fires. Further, most exit sign installation standards do not consider exit sign visibility in smoke-filled environments. Thus, exit sign visibility can be considered to be low during actual fires. To overcome this issue, a means of improving visibility was investigated in this study by changing the exit sign color. A full-scale experiment was conducted to analyse the maximum cognitive distance (The maximum cognitive distance is defined as the greatest distance at which an observer can clearly identify the content of an exit sign) according to the exit sign safety colour in which a smoke-filled environment was simulated using a translucent eye patch. The smoke-filled environment was divided into nine levels of obstructed visibility according to the visibility distance when a translucent eye patch was worn. The maximum cognitive distance was measured for exit signs in seven safety colours (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, navy, and purple). The results showed that the mean maximum cognitive distances of the navy, purple, blue, and red exit signs were greater than that of the green exit sign, which is widely used currently. The navy, purple, blue, and red exit signs had mean maximum cognitive distances approximately 1.29 times, 1.23 times, 1.22 times, and 1.21 times longer than that of the green exit sign, respectively. The differences in the mean maximum cognitive distance were found to be statistically significant at a level of 0.05. This study’s analysis showed that these four colours had a greater contrast effect on the background colour (white) than green. Hence, the contrast difference between the safety colour and the background colour is considered the main parameter affecting cognitive performance for the exit sign lighting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"59 6","pages":"3445 - 3471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-023-01474-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Exit signs are intended to help occupants promptly and accurately select evacuation paths during emergencies. However, according to previous studies and accident cases, exit signs are not helpful for occupants during emergency situations, which can be attributed to limited visibility due to the smoke generated during fires. Further, most exit sign installation standards do not consider exit sign visibility in smoke-filled environments. Thus, exit sign visibility can be considered to be low during actual fires. To overcome this issue, a means of improving visibility was investigated in this study by changing the exit sign color. A full-scale experiment was conducted to analyse the maximum cognitive distance (The maximum cognitive distance is defined as the greatest distance at which an observer can clearly identify the content of an exit sign) according to the exit sign safety colour in which a smoke-filled environment was simulated using a translucent eye patch. The smoke-filled environment was divided into nine levels of obstructed visibility according to the visibility distance when a translucent eye patch was worn. The maximum cognitive distance was measured for exit signs in seven safety colours (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, navy, and purple). The results showed that the mean maximum cognitive distances of the navy, purple, blue, and red exit signs were greater than that of the green exit sign, which is widely used currently. The navy, purple, blue, and red exit signs had mean maximum cognitive distances approximately 1.29 times, 1.23 times, 1.22 times, and 1.21 times longer than that of the green exit sign, respectively. The differences in the mean maximum cognitive distance were found to be statistically significant at a level of 0.05. This study’s analysis showed that these four colours had a greater contrast effect on the background colour (white) than green. Hence, the contrast difference between the safety colour and the background colour is considered the main parameter affecting cognitive performance for the exit sign lighting.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用半透明眼罩模拟烟雾弥漫环境中每个紧急出口标志颜色的最大认知距离评估
出口标志旨在帮助乘客在紧急情况下及时准确地选择疏散路径。然而,根据先前的研究和事故案例,在紧急情况下,出口标志对乘客没有帮助,这可归因于火灾期间产生的烟雾导致能见度有限。此外,大多数出口标志安装标准不考虑在烟雾弥漫的环境中出口标志的可见性。因此,在实际火灾期间,可以认为出口标志的能见度较低。为了克服这个问题,本研究研究通过改变出口标志的颜色来提高能见度。根据使用半透明眼罩模拟烟雾弥漫环境的出口标志安全颜色,进行了一项全尺寸实验来分析最大认知距离(最大认知距离定义为观察者能够清楚识别出口标志内容的最大距离)。根据佩戴半透明眼罩时的能见度距离,烟雾弥漫的环境被分为九级能见度障碍。测量了七种安全颜色(红色、橙色、黄色、绿色、蓝色、海军蓝和紫色)的出口标志的最大认知距离。结果表明,海军、紫色、蓝色和红色出口标志的平均最大认知距离大于目前广泛使用的绿色出口标志。海军蓝、紫色、蓝色和红色出口标志的平均最大认知距离分别是绿色出口标志的1.29倍、1.23倍、1.22倍和1.21倍。平均最大认知距离的差异在0.05的水平上具有统计学意义。这项研究的分析表明,这四种颜色对背景色(白色)的对比度大于绿色。因此,安全色和背景色之间的对比度差异被认为是影响出口标志照明认知性能的主要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
期刊最新文献
Thermal Degradation of Mechanical Properties in Super Ductile Reinforcing Steel Bars: A Comparative Study with Conventional Bars Flame Retarded Adhesive Tapes and Their Influence on the Fire Behavior of Bonded Parts Experimental and Numerical Study on Early-Warning Approach for Fire-Induced Collapse of Steel Portal Frame Based on Rotational Angles Water Spray Effects on Fire Smoke Stratification in a Symmetrical V-Shaped Tunnel Fire Video Intelligent Monitoring Method Based on Moving Target Enhancement and PRV-YOLO Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1