The effect of extraction methods on the yields, chemical composition and antifungal activity of sawdust Cedrus atlantica Manetti essential oils

Chaimaa Bouyahia, M. Benbouzi̇d, S. El hajjaji, M. Slaoui̇, F. Bentata, M. Labhi̇li̇li̇, A. Bouyahya
{"title":"The effect of extraction methods on the yields, chemical composition and antifungal activity of sawdust Cedrus atlantica Manetti essential oils","authors":"Chaimaa Bouyahia, M. Benbouzi̇d, S. El hajjaji, M. Slaoui̇, F. Bentata, M. Labhi̇li̇li̇, A. Bouyahya","doi":"10.21448/ijsm.1047122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to determine the effect of the extraction method on the yield, the chemical composition, and the antifungal activity of cedarwood essential oils (EOs) from sawdust of Moroccan Cedrus atlantica (C. atlantica). EOs were extracted by different methods: hydrodistillation, soxhlet, maceration, and ultrasound. The chemical composition was determined using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The yields of EOs were 5.60%, 11.68%, 4.82% and 9.33% for hydrodistillation, soxhlet, maceration and ultrasound, respectively. GC-MS revealed a diversity of chemical compounds depending on extraction methods. Indeed, the main compound of EOs obtained by soxhlet, maceration, and ultrasound was copalic acid methyl ester by a rate of 28.41%, 20.24%, and 24.17%, respectively. However, -himachalene (21.32%) followed by -himachalene (9.40%), β-Copaen-4α-ol (7.71%) and longifolene (6.74%) are the main compounds of EO extracted by hydrodistillation. The antifungal activity of cedarwood EO was tested in vitro on two pathogenic fungi: Fusarium culmorum (F. Culmorum) and Botrytis cineria (B. Cinerea). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by successive dilutions of the stock solutions. The extracted EOs by soxhlet, maceration and ultrasound showed the important inhibitory effect against B. cinerea (MIC=1.25 mL/L). However, F. culmorum showed resistance towards all tested EOs. The finding of this study showed clearly that the volatile composition of EOs can be variable according to extraction. methods. Moreover, antifungal effects are depending on chemical composition of EOs but also to tested staris.","PeriodicalId":14437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Secondary Metabolite","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Secondary Metabolite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.1047122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work is to determine the effect of the extraction method on the yield, the chemical composition, and the antifungal activity of cedarwood essential oils (EOs) from sawdust of Moroccan Cedrus atlantica (C. atlantica). EOs were extracted by different methods: hydrodistillation, soxhlet, maceration, and ultrasound. The chemical composition was determined using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The yields of EOs were 5.60%, 11.68%, 4.82% and 9.33% for hydrodistillation, soxhlet, maceration and ultrasound, respectively. GC-MS revealed a diversity of chemical compounds depending on extraction methods. Indeed, the main compound of EOs obtained by soxhlet, maceration, and ultrasound was copalic acid methyl ester by a rate of 28.41%, 20.24%, and 24.17%, respectively. However, -himachalene (21.32%) followed by -himachalene (9.40%), β-Copaen-4α-ol (7.71%) and longifolene (6.74%) are the main compounds of EO extracted by hydrodistillation. The antifungal activity of cedarwood EO was tested in vitro on two pathogenic fungi: Fusarium culmorum (F. Culmorum) and Botrytis cineria (B. Cinerea). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by successive dilutions of the stock solutions. The extracted EOs by soxhlet, maceration and ultrasound showed the important inhibitory effect against B. cinerea (MIC=1.25 mL/L). However, F. culmorum showed resistance towards all tested EOs. The finding of this study showed clearly that the volatile composition of EOs can be variable according to extraction. methods. Moreover, antifungal effects are depending on chemical composition of EOs but also to tested staris.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究了不同提取方法对木木屑精油产率、化学成分及抗真菌活性的影响
本工作的目的是确定提取方法对摩洛哥大西洋雪松锯末中雪松精油的产量、化学成分和抗真菌活性的影响。EOs通过不同的方法提取:水溶、索氏、浸渍和超声。使用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析来测定化学成分。加氢蒸馏、索氏蒸馏、浸渍和超声的EOs产率分别为5.60%、11.68%、4.82%和9.33%。GC-MS揭示了不同提取方法的化合物的多样性。事实上,通过索氏法、浸渍法和超声法获得的EOs的主要化合物是共聚酸甲酯,其比率分别为28.41%、20.24%和24.17%。然而-himachalene(21.32%)-α-醇(7.71%)和长叶烯(6.74%)是EO的主要化合物。对雪松EO对两种病原真菌:镰刀菌(Fusarium culmorum)和灰葡萄孢(Botrytis cineria)的体外抗真菌活性进行了测试。最小抑制浓度(MIC)通过储备溶液的连续稀释来确定。经索氏、浸渍和超声提取的EOs对灰葡萄球菌具有重要的抑制作用(MIC=1.25mL/L)。然而,禾秆镰刀菌对所有测试的EOs都表现出抗性。这项研究的发现清楚地表明,EOs的挥发性成分可以根据提取而变化。方法。此外,抗真菌作用取决于EOs的化学成分,也取决于测试的淀粉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Secondary Metabolite
International Journal of Secondary Metabolite Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Content of saponin, tannin, and flavonoid in the leaves and fruits of Iranian populations from Rhamnus persica Boiss. (Rhamnaceae) Phytochemical constituents of the roots of Heliotropium verdcourtii (Boraginaceae) Changes in antioxidant properties of pepper leaves (Capsicum annuum L.) upon UV radiation Genetic structure and molecular analysis of the species of the genus Artemisia L. (Asteraceae) distributed in Azerbaijan Investigating medicinal plants for antimicrobial benefits in a changing climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1