A Literature Review on Corporate Governance Mechanisms: Past, Present, and Future*

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI:10.1111/1911-3838.12279
Jackie Di Vito, Kim Trottier
{"title":"A Literature Review on Corporate Governance Mechanisms: Past, Present, and Future*","authors":"Jackie Di Vito,&nbsp;Kim Trottier","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study is a literature review on corporate governance. Its objective is to consolidate our knowledge in this field, examine its evolution, and propose avenues for future research. In our review of the past and present literature on various governance measures and their effect on firm performance, we find that the empirical results are mixed for many of the governance mechanisms studied. We propose that these mixed results may be due to applying a “one size fits all” set of governance measures, which is not effective for all types of firms due to the complexity of organizations and the differences in ownership structures. We therefore explore more technologically advanced methodologies, including machine learning. We believe that this line of research could not only improve and refine existing governance measures but also allow us to better target which set of mechanisms might be appropriate for a firm based on its particular characteristics. We encourage future researchers in corporate governance to consider this approach in order to shed light on and fill the gaps in this area of research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"21 2","pages":"207-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3838.12279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study is a literature review on corporate governance. Its objective is to consolidate our knowledge in this field, examine its evolution, and propose avenues for future research. In our review of the past and present literature on various governance measures and their effect on firm performance, we find that the empirical results are mixed for many of the governance mechanisms studied. We propose that these mixed results may be due to applying a “one size fits all” set of governance measures, which is not effective for all types of firms due to the complexity of organizations and the differences in ownership structures. We therefore explore more technologically advanced methodologies, including machine learning. We believe that this line of research could not only improve and refine existing governance measures but also allow us to better target which set of mechanisms might be appropriate for a firm based on its particular characteristics. We encourage future researchers in corporate governance to consider this approach in order to shed light on and fill the gaps in this area of research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司治理机制:过去、现在和未来的文献综述*
本研究是对公司治理的文献综述。其目的是巩固我们在这一领域的知识,研究其演变,并为未来的研究提出途径。在我们回顾过去和现在关于各种治理措施及其对公司绩效影响的文献时,我们发现,对于许多所研究的治理机制,实证结果是混合的。我们认为,这些混合结果可能是由于采用了一套“一刀切”的治理措施,由于组织的复杂性和所有权结构的差异,这种治理措施并非对所有类型的公司都有效。因此,我们探索更先进的技术方法,包括机器学习。我们认为,这一研究路线不仅可以改进和完善现有的治理措施,而且还可以使我们根据公司的特定特征更好地确定哪一套机制可能适合公司。我们鼓励未来的公司治理研究人员考虑这种方法,以阐明和填补这一研究领域的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Perspectives
Accounting Perspectives BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Accounting Perspectives provides a forum for peer-reviewed applied research, analysis, synthesis and commentary on issues of interest to academics, practitioners, financial analysts, financial executives, regulators, accounting policy makers and accounting students. Articles are sought from academics and practitioners that address relevant issues in any and all areas of accounting and related fields, including financial accounting and reporting, auditing and other assurance services, management accounting and performance measurement, information systems and related technologies, tax policy and practice, professional ethics, accounting education, and related topics. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Financial Reporting & Assurance Standards (FRAS) Canada Corner The Relationship Between Financial Education in Young Adults and Financial Literacy: A Review of the Literature in Canada and the United States* An Exploration of Technological Innovations in the Audit Industry: Disruption Theory Applied to a Regulated Industry* Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1