Risk prediction for cut-ins using multi-driver simulation data and machine learning algorithms: A comparison among decision tree, GBDT and LSTM

Tianyang Luo, Junhua Wang, Ting Fu, Qiangqiang Shangguan, Shou'en Fang
{"title":"Risk prediction for cut-ins using multi-driver simulation data and machine learning algorithms: A comparison among decision tree, GBDT and LSTM","authors":"Tianyang Luo,&nbsp;Junhua Wang,&nbsp;Ting Fu,&nbsp;Qiangqiang Shangguan,&nbsp;Shou'en Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cut-ins (one kind of lane-changing behaviors) have result in severe safety issues, especially at the entrances and exits of urban expressways. Risk prediction and characteristics analysis of cut-ins are part of the essential research for advanced in-vehicle technologies which can reduce crash occurrences. This paper makes some efforts on these purposes. In this paper, twenty-four participants were recruited to conduct the experiments of multi-driver simulation for risky driving data collection. The surrogate measures, Time Exposure Time-to-Collision (TET) and Time Integrated Time-to-collision (TIT) were employed to quantify the risk of cut-ins, then k-means clustering was applied for risk classification of 3 levels. Multiple candidate variables of two kinds were extracted including 10 behavioral variables and 7 driver trait variables. Based on these variables, three prediction models including decision tree (DT), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) and long short-term memory (LSTM) are used for predicting the risks of cut-ins. Results from data validity verification show that the data collected from multi-driver simulation experiments is valid compared with real-world data. From results of risk prediction models, the LSTM, with an overall accuracy of 87%, outperforms the GBDT (80.67%) and DT (76.9%). Despite this, this paper also concludes the merits of the DT over the GBDT and LSTM in variable explanation and the results of DT suggest that controlling the proper lane-changing gap and short duration of cut-ins can help reduce risks of cut-ins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 862-877"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043022001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The cut-ins (one kind of lane-changing behaviors) have result in severe safety issues, especially at the entrances and exits of urban expressways. Risk prediction and characteristics analysis of cut-ins are part of the essential research for advanced in-vehicle technologies which can reduce crash occurrences. This paper makes some efforts on these purposes. In this paper, twenty-four participants were recruited to conduct the experiments of multi-driver simulation for risky driving data collection. The surrogate measures, Time Exposure Time-to-Collision (TET) and Time Integrated Time-to-collision (TIT) were employed to quantify the risk of cut-ins, then k-means clustering was applied for risk classification of 3 levels. Multiple candidate variables of two kinds were extracted including 10 behavioral variables and 7 driver trait variables. Based on these variables, three prediction models including decision tree (DT), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) and long short-term memory (LSTM) are used for predicting the risks of cut-ins. Results from data validity verification show that the data collected from multi-driver simulation experiments is valid compared with real-world data. From results of risk prediction models, the LSTM, with an overall accuracy of 87%, outperforms the GBDT (80.67%) and DT (76.9%). Despite this, this paper also concludes the merits of the DT over the GBDT and LSTM in variable explanation and the results of DT suggest that controlling the proper lane-changing gap and short duration of cut-ins can help reduce risks of cut-ins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多驾驶员仿真数据和机器学习算法的切入风险预测:决策树、GBDT和LSTM的比较
超车(一种变道行为)造成了严重的安全问题,特别是在城市高速公路的出入口。为了减少碰撞事故的发生,对先进车载技术进行风险预测和特性分析是必不可少的研究内容。本文在这方面做了一些努力。本文招募了24名参与者进行多驾驶员模拟实验,采集危险驾驶数据。采用时间暴露碰撞时间(TET)和时间集成碰撞时间(TIT)作为替代指标量化割伤风险,并采用k-means聚类对风险进行3个等级的分类。提取了两类多候选变量,包括10个行为变量和7个驾驶特征变量。基于这些变量,采用决策树(DT)、梯度增强决策树(GBDT)和长短期记忆(LSTM)三种预测模型对切分风险进行预测。数据有效性验证结果表明,多驾驶员仿真实验数据与实际数据相比是有效的。从风险预测模型的结果来看,LSTM的总体准确率为87%,优于GBDT(80.67%)和DT(76.9%)。尽管如此,本文还总结了DT在变量解释方面相对于GBDT和LSTM的优点,DT的结果表明,控制适当的变道间隙和较短的插队时间有助于降低插队风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
88 days
期刊最新文献
Comparing the vibrational behavior of e-kick scooters and e-bikes: Evidence from Italy Injury severity of drowsy drivers involved in single vehicle crashes: Accounting for temporal instability and unobserved heterogeneity Train rescheduling and platforming in large high-speed railway stations Characteristics and identification of risky driving behaviors in expressway tunnels based on behavior spectrum Performance evaluation of Bailey method used in asphalt mixtures containing natural river sands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1