How Selection of a Target Feature Impacts Corrective Feedback: Finding Answers Through Meta-Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1515/CJAL-2022-0208
Andrew Schenck
{"title":"How Selection of a Target Feature Impacts Corrective Feedback: Finding Answers Through Meta-Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners","authors":"Andrew Schenck","doi":"10.1515/CJAL-2022-0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rather than looking at variables like grammatical feature type, proficiency, and L1 as separate, we must start to view them as interrelated and codependent. In this way, educators may finally learn how to maximize the effect of corrective feedback (CF). A meta-analysis of 13 studies was conducted to examine four styles of CF (implicit prompt, implicit reformulation, explicit prompt, and explicit reformulation) along with the following variables: grammatical feature type, L1 similarity (with Mandarin Chinese), and proficiency level. Results suggest that effect size is highly dependent upon the grammatical feature targeted. Explicit feedback appears to have a scaffolding effect for more semantically or syntactically complex grammatical features. Implicit reformulations (recasts) also provide scaffolding, yielding larger effect sizes than implicit prompts when used with L1 dissimilar features that are more semantically or syntactically complex.","PeriodicalId":43185,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"45 1","pages":"274 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2022-0208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Rather than looking at variables like grammatical feature type, proficiency, and L1 as separate, we must start to view them as interrelated and codependent. In this way, educators may finally learn how to maximize the effect of corrective feedback (CF). A meta-analysis of 13 studies was conducted to examine four styles of CF (implicit prompt, implicit reformulation, explicit prompt, and explicit reformulation) along with the following variables: grammatical feature type, L1 similarity (with Mandarin Chinese), and proficiency level. Results suggest that effect size is highly dependent upon the grammatical feature targeted. Explicit feedback appears to have a scaffolding effect for more semantically or syntactically complex grammatical features. Implicit reformulations (recasts) also provide scaffolding, yielding larger effect sizes than implicit prompts when used with L1 dissimilar features that are more semantically or syntactically complex.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标特征的选择对纠正反馈的影响——基于中国英语学习者的元分析
摘要我们必须开始将语法特征类型、熟练程度和L1等变量视为相互关联和相互依赖的变量,而不是将其视为单独的变量。通过这种方式,教育工作者可能最终学会如何最大限度地发挥纠正反馈(CF)的效果。对13项研究进行了荟萃分析,以检验四种风格的CF(内隐提示、内隐重新表述、外显提示和外显重新表述)以及以下变量:语法特征类型、L1相似性(与普通话)和熟练程度。结果表明,效果大小在很大程度上取决于所针对的语法特征。显式反馈似乎对语义或句法上更复杂的语法特征具有支架效应。隐式重新表述(重铸)也提供了支架,当与语义或句法更复杂的L1不同特征一起使用时,产生的效果比隐式提示更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
377
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (CJAL) (formerly known as Teaching English in China – CELEA Journal) was created in 1978 as a newsletter by the British Council, Beijing. It is the affiliated journal of the China English Language Education Association (founded in 1981 and now the Chinese affiliate of AILA [International Association of Applied Linguistics]). The Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics is the only English language teaching (ELT) journal in China that is published in English, serving as a window to Chinese reform on ELT for professionals in China and around the world. The journal is internationally focused, fully refereed, and its articles address a wide variety of topics in Chinese applied linguistics which include – but also reach beyond – the topics of language education and second language acquisition.
期刊最新文献
Metadiscourse in MOOC Video Lectures: Comparison with University Lectures and Disciplinary Variation “Here, We Investigate If There Is …”: A Functional Investigation of Self-Mentions in Research Article Abstracts Building Successful Communication in EMI Contexts: A Multimodal Approach to Organizational Metadiscourse in Intercultural Lectures One Journal, Different Practices: A Corpus-Based Study of Interactive Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics Digesting Psychology: Metadiscourse as a Recontextualising Tool in the Digital Communication of Disciplinary Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1