External Validation of the TERMINAL-24 Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Multiple Trauma

Waratsuda Samuthtai, J. Patumanond, Pawitrabhorn Samuthtai, T. Charernboon, Kijja Jearwattanakanok, J. Khorana
{"title":"External Validation of the TERMINAL-24 Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Multiple Trauma","authors":"Waratsuda Samuthtai, J. Patumanond, Pawitrabhorn Samuthtai, T. Charernboon, Kijja Jearwattanakanok, J. Khorana","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: A prediction model: \"TERMINAL-24,” was developed and internally validated for use in predicting early mortality of multiple trauma patients in the Emergency Department. In this study this model's external validity and generalizability was evaluated.Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort was used for the construction of two datasets. Temporal external validation used the dataset from the same location at a different period, and geographic external validation used the dataset from a different location.Results: In total, 1,932 patients underwent temporal external validation, with 14 (0.7%) patients dyeing within 8 hours, 35 (1.8%) patients died between 8 and 24 hours, and 1,883(97.5%) patients were alive at 24 hours. From this, 2,336 patients were eligible for geographical external validation, with 106 (4.5%) patients having died at the emergency room, 143 (6.1%) patients died in hospital and 2,087 (89.3%) patients survived. The TERMINAL-24 score was applied to both datasets, with a benchmark of 4 or higher (range 0-5). In the temporal dataset, this score showed a mortality of greater than 20% (specificity 0.97) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) 0.91 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.96); whereas, it demonstrated a mortality of greater than 60% (specificity 0.99) AuROC 0.92 (95%CI 0.89-0.94) in the geographical dataset.Conclusion: TERMINAL-24 was effective at predicting early death in the emergency room. It was successfully implemented within the same hospital; hoever, the cut-point should be adapted for application in other institutions with unspecified time of death. Prospective studies at different hospitals should be planned to generalize this scoring system for clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A prediction model: "TERMINAL-24,” was developed and internally validated for use in predicting early mortality of multiple trauma patients in the Emergency Department. In this study this model's external validity and generalizability was evaluated.Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort was used for the construction of two datasets. Temporal external validation used the dataset from the same location at a different period, and geographic external validation used the dataset from a different location.Results: In total, 1,932 patients underwent temporal external validation, with 14 (0.7%) patients dyeing within 8 hours, 35 (1.8%) patients died between 8 and 24 hours, and 1,883(97.5%) patients were alive at 24 hours. From this, 2,336 patients were eligible for geographical external validation, with 106 (4.5%) patients having died at the emergency room, 143 (6.1%) patients died in hospital and 2,087 (89.3%) patients survived. The TERMINAL-24 score was applied to both datasets, with a benchmark of 4 or higher (range 0-5). In the temporal dataset, this score showed a mortality of greater than 20% (specificity 0.97) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) 0.91 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.96); whereas, it demonstrated a mortality of greater than 60% (specificity 0.99) AuROC 0.92 (95%CI 0.89-0.94) in the geographical dataset.Conclusion: TERMINAL-24 was effective at predicting early death in the emergency room. It was successfully implemented within the same hospital; hoever, the cut-point should be adapted for application in other institutions with unspecified time of death. Prospective studies at different hospitals should be planned to generalize this scoring system for clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测多重创伤患者死亡率的TERMINAL-24评分的外部验证
目的:开发了一个预测模型:“TERMINAL-24”,并进行了内部验证,用于预测急诊科多发创伤患者的早期死亡率。本研究对该模型的外部效度和可推广性进行了评价。材料和方法:采用回顾性队列构建两个数据集。时间外部验证使用来自不同时期同一位置的数据集,地理外部验证使用来自不同位置的数据集。结果:共有1932例患者接受了时间外部验证,8小时内染色14例(0.7%),8 - 24小时死亡35例(1.8%),24小时存活1883例(97.5%)。由此,2,336例患者符合地理外部验证的条件,其中106例(4.5%)患者在急诊室死亡,143例(6.1%)患者在医院死亡,2,087例(89.3%)患者存活。TERMINAL-24评分应用于两个数据集,基准为4或更高(范围0-5)。在时间数据集中,该评分显示死亡率大于20%(特异性0.97),受试者工作特征曲线(AuROC)下面积0.91(95%置信区间(CI) 0.85-0.96);然而,在地理数据集中,它显示死亡率大于60%(特异性0.99),roc为0.92 (95%CI 0.89-0.94)。结论:TERMINAL-24可有效预测急诊室早期死亡。它在同一家医院内成功实施;然而,这一分界点应适用于死亡时间未明确的其他机构。应计划在不同医院进行前瞻性研究,将该评分系统推广到临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1