Voting experience in a new era: The impact of past eligibility on the breakdown of mainstream parties

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Research and Politics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20531680231157288
Fernando De la Cuesta
{"title":"Voting experience in a new era: The impact of past eligibility on the breakdown of mainstream parties","authors":"Fernando De la Cuesta","doi":"10.1177/20531680231157288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the influence of the context in shaping the effects on later voting behavior of first experiences with voting. I leverage from changes in the political context in Spain produced by the Great Recession to answer whether individuals’ first voting experience affects the electoral support for mainstream parties differently depending on the different political context that first voters experienced before and after the Great Recession. I use a novel database of pre-electoral surveys between 2000 and 2015 and a difference-in-differences analysis. I exploit the exogenous variation produced by the legal voting-age threshold in Spain (18 years-old) among people of the same cohort. I find that, after the Great Recession, second-time eligibility voters have a higher probability to vote for mainstream forces than their counterfactual equals. The results show that, in a context of political change, first voting experience strengthens the vote for mainstream parties. The results show that previous voting experience creates favorable inertia for mainstream parties that slow down the change of a political system.","PeriodicalId":37327,"journal":{"name":"Research and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231157288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies the influence of the context in shaping the effects on later voting behavior of first experiences with voting. I leverage from changes in the political context in Spain produced by the Great Recession to answer whether individuals’ first voting experience affects the electoral support for mainstream parties differently depending on the different political context that first voters experienced before and after the Great Recession. I use a novel database of pre-electoral surveys between 2000 and 2015 and a difference-in-differences analysis. I exploit the exogenous variation produced by the legal voting-age threshold in Spain (18 years-old) among people of the same cohort. I find that, after the Great Recession, second-time eligibility voters have a higher probability to vote for mainstream forces than their counterfactual equals. The results show that, in a context of political change, first voting experience strengthens the vote for mainstream parties. The results show that previous voting experience creates favorable inertia for mainstream parties that slow down the change of a political system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新时代的投票经历:过去的资格对主流政党崩溃的影响
本文研究了语境对初次投票经历对后来投票行为的影响。我利用大衰退造成的西班牙政治环境的变化来回答个人的第一次投票经历是否会对主流政党的选举支持产生不同的影响,这取决于第一次选民在大衰退前后经历的不同政治环境。我使用了一个新的2000年至2015年选举前调查数据库,并进行了差异中差异分析。我利用了西班牙法定投票年龄门槛(18岁)在同一群体中产生的外生差异。我发现,在大衰退(Great Recession)之后,第二次有资格投票的选民投票给主流势力的可能性要高于他们的反事实对手。结果表明,在政治变革的背景下,首次投票经验加强了对主流政党的投票。结果表明,以往的投票经验为主流政党创造了有利的惯性,从而减缓了政治制度的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Politics
Research and Politics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research & Politics aims to advance systematic peer-reviewed research in political science and related fields through the open access publication of the very best cutting-edge research and policy analysis. The journal provides a venue for scholars to communicate rapidly and succinctly important new insights to the broadest possible audience while maintaining the highest standards of quality control.
期刊最新文献
Voters don’t care too much about policy: How politicians conceive of voting motives Assessing survey mode effects in the 2019 EP elections: A comparison of online and face-to-face-survey data from six European countries Unexpected, but consistent and pre-registered: Experimental evidence on interview language and Latino views of COVID-19 Thinking generically and specifically in International Relations survey experiments Infectious disease and political violence: Evidence from malaria and civil conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1