A refundable tax credit for children: its impact on poverty, inequality, and household debt

IF 0.6 3区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Journal of Post Keynesian Economics Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/01603477.2022.2107017
S. Pressman, Robert H. Scott
{"title":"A refundable tax credit for children: its impact on poverty, inequality, and household debt","authors":"S. Pressman, Robert H. Scott","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2022.2107017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Households with children face burdens that households without children don’t face. Besides food, clothing, shelter and healthcare, childcare can easily run several thousand dollars each year. Historically, US economic and social policies have done little to help families with children. Until 2018, families with children were helped indirectly through tax exemptions for children and some child tax credits. These benefits mainly helped middle-income families in high tax brackets. Things changed with American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provided a refundable tax credit to all families with children ($3,600 annually for children under six and $3,000 for those six and older)—even families with no taxable income. This payment is like the child allowance programs that exist in nearly all nations. Our paper examines how the refundable child tax credit affected the economic condition of US households with children, and the impact of this credit on poverty and income inequality in the United States. We conclude with some suggestions for improving the refundable child credit so that it does a better job of helping families with children.","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2022.2107017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Households with children face burdens that households without children don’t face. Besides food, clothing, shelter and healthcare, childcare can easily run several thousand dollars each year. Historically, US economic and social policies have done little to help families with children. Until 2018, families with children were helped indirectly through tax exemptions for children and some child tax credits. These benefits mainly helped middle-income families in high tax brackets. Things changed with American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provided a refundable tax credit to all families with children ($3,600 annually for children under six and $3,000 for those six and older)—even families with no taxable income. This payment is like the child allowance programs that exist in nearly all nations. Our paper examines how the refundable child tax credit affected the economic condition of US households with children, and the impact of this credit on poverty and income inequality in the United States. We conclude with some suggestions for improving the refundable child credit so that it does a better job of helping families with children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可退还的儿童税收抵免:对贫困、不平等和家庭债务的影响
摘要有孩子的家庭面临着没有孩子的家庭所没有的负担。除了食物、衣服、住所和医疗保健,儿童保育每年可以轻松花费数千美元。从历史上看,美国的经济和社会政策对有孩子的家庭几乎没有帮助。直到2018年,有孩子的家庭都通过儿童免税和一些儿童税收抵免得到了间接帮助。这些福利主要帮助高税收阶层的中等收入家庭。随着2021年《美国救援计划法案》的出台,情况发生了变化,该法案为所有有孩子的家庭提供了可退还的税收抵免(六岁以下儿童每年3600美元,六岁及以上儿童每年3000美元),甚至是没有应纳税收入的家庭。这种支付方式类似于几乎所有国家都存在的儿童津贴计划。我们的论文研究了可退还的儿童税收抵免如何影响有孩子的美国家庭的经济状况,以及这种抵免对美国贫困和收入不平等的影响。最后,我们提出了一些建议,以改善可退还的儿童信贷,使其更好地帮助有孩子的家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Post Keynesian Economics is a scholarly journal of innovative theoretical and empirical work that sheds fresh light on contemporary economic problems. It is committed to the principle that cumulative development of economic theory is only possible when the theory is continuously subjected to scrutiny in terms of its ability both to explain the real world and to provide a reliable guide to public policy.
期刊最新文献
Joseph Schumpeter, Allyn Young, and the future of capitalism Extending the “principle of effective demand” – did Keynes produce an ad hoc tautology? Household financial fragility in Brazil (2005–2023): a minskyan analysis An empirical analysis of the relationship between real wage appreciation and inflation in Brazil Functional income distribution, effective demand and wealth in Denmark – insights from an empirical stock-flow consistent model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1