“Us too”: Processes of Resistance and (Re)Negotiation Among Women with Functional Diversity

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1177/08861099221129626
Gloria Lucena Fernández
{"title":"“Us too”: Processes of Resistance and (Re)Negotiation Among Women with Functional Diversity","authors":"Gloria Lucena Fernández","doi":"10.1177/08861099221129626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking a feminist and intersectional approach, this article conducts a socio-political analysis of the traditional paradigms of disability through an ethnographic study of the life histories of women with functional diversity (FD). In Spain, the term “people with functional diversity” has emerged as a preferred denomination for many, if not all, people and entities working in this field because it emphasizes the contribution of people with FD to society. Based on interviews with six study participants, the analysis examines these women's discourses and the different ways that they deconstruct traditional models of disability and ableism and the patriarchal and capitalist social categories that constrain them in positions of inequality and oppression. In particular, the analysis centers on the different ways of “being” a woman with FD and the transformative capacity of agency in overturning traditional representations in favor of plurality and inclusiveness. By challenging marginalized social categories, the women claim ownership of their bodies and sexuality and also open routes to social resources. Nevertheless, the research also shows that these resistances often took place at an individual rather than a collective level. Hence, while emphasizing the agentive capacity of the participants, the study shows how each of their biographies is framed within a socio-political context. This research makes an important contribution to the theory and practice of social work as it questions the traditional categories of FD and brings us closer to the lived experiences and practices of the study participants.","PeriodicalId":47277,"journal":{"name":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","volume":"38 1","pages":"397 - 412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099221129626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taking a feminist and intersectional approach, this article conducts a socio-political analysis of the traditional paradigms of disability through an ethnographic study of the life histories of women with functional diversity (FD). In Spain, the term “people with functional diversity” has emerged as a preferred denomination for many, if not all, people and entities working in this field because it emphasizes the contribution of people with FD to society. Based on interviews with six study participants, the analysis examines these women's discourses and the different ways that they deconstruct traditional models of disability and ableism and the patriarchal and capitalist social categories that constrain them in positions of inequality and oppression. In particular, the analysis centers on the different ways of “being” a woman with FD and the transformative capacity of agency in overturning traditional representations in favor of plurality and inclusiveness. By challenging marginalized social categories, the women claim ownership of their bodies and sexuality and also open routes to social resources. Nevertheless, the research also shows that these resistances often took place at an individual rather than a collective level. Hence, while emphasizing the agentive capacity of the participants, the study shows how each of their biographies is framed within a socio-political context. This research makes an important contribution to the theory and practice of social work as it questions the traditional categories of FD and brings us closer to the lived experiences and practices of the study participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们也是”:功能多样性妇女的抵抗和(重新)谈判过程
本文采用女权主义和交叉的方法,通过对功能多样性女性(FD)生活史的民族志研究,对残疾的传统范式进行了社会政治分析。在西班牙,“功能多样性人群”一词已成为从事该领域工作的许多人(如果不是所有人的话)和实体的首选教派,因为它强调FD患者对社会的贡献。基于对六名研究参与者的采访,该分析考察了这些女性的话语,以及她们解构残疾和能力主义传统模式的不同方式,以及将她们束缚在不平等和压迫地位的父权制和资本主义社会类别。特别是,分析的重点是FD女性的不同“成为”方式,以及机构在推翻传统表征以支持多元化和包容性方面的变革能力。通过挑战边缘化的社会类别,妇女声称拥有自己的身体和性取向,并开辟了获得社会资源的途径。然而,研究也表明,这些阻力往往发生在个人层面,而不是集体层面。因此,在强调参与者的代理能力的同时,该研究展示了他们的每一本传记是如何在社会政治背景下构建的。这项研究对社会工作的理论和实践做出了重要贡献,因为它质疑了FD的传统类别,并使我们更接近研究参与者的生活经历和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work is dedicated to the discussion and development of feminist values, theories, and knowledge as they relate to social work and social welfare research, education, and practice. The intent of Affilia is to bring insight and knowledge to the task of eliminating discrimination and oppression, especially with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, class, age, disability, and sexual and affectional preference.
期刊最新文献
(In)Consistent Performance Feedback and the Locus of Search. Who Do We Call “Creepy?”: Sex Workers’ Relationships as Targets of Intimate Intervention Social Work in a Post-Dobbs World: The ‘Adoption Fallacy’, Decolonization, and Reproductive Justice Book Review: Working it: Sex workers on the work of sex by Bickers, M., Breshears, P., & Luna, J. The Imposition of a Coerced Autonomy: Suicidal “Bad Girls,” Human Service Professionals, and Gender Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1