“Fighting for the Russian Cause”: The Imperial Colonisation of Turkestan

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestio Rossica Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.15826/qr.2022.5.751
Yulia Tsyryapkina
{"title":"“Fighting for the Russian Cause”: The Imperial Colonisation of Turkestan","authors":"Yulia Tsyryapkina","doi":"10.15826/qr.2022.5.751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the political vision and imperial administration projects related to tasks and objectives of the Russian colonisation of Turkestan in the second half of the nineteenth – early twentieth centuries. The author singles out categories of colonists and their objectives and discusses the difficulties behind the realisation of the imperial settlement project. Special attention is paid to the methods used to realise the development of conquered Turkestan, which combined the use of religious differences in population administration (the concept of “confessional state” by P. Werth) and emerging and expanding national discourse. Earlier studies closely examined the stages and numbers of the resettlement movement to Turkestan but did not consider how the imperial and Turkestan administration perceived the realisation of the region’s development. The research describes the points of view of imperial officials, supervisors, and inspectors of the resettlement processes to Turkestan and the adaptation of the imperial agents. The author refers to unpublished materials (recordkeeping, narrative, etc.) from the funds of the Central State Archive of the Republic of Uzbekistan, introduced into scholarly circulation for the first time. They make it possible to show the difficulties faced by Russia in realising its colonisation strategies in Turkestan, different assessments of colonists’ potential, and problems which were the subject of departmental correspondence of the Turkestan civil authorities. The author concludes that there was a considerable discrepancy between the political objectives and tasks of the Russian settler movement in Turkestan defined by imperial administration and the implementation of the project connected with the social-economic and cultural adaptation of Orthodox settlers in the region. The analysis of documents makes it possible to reconstruct the complex problems of the imperial project of the use of religious and national identity as a cultural basis of the civilizing mission in Turkestan.","PeriodicalId":43664,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio Rossica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestio Rossica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.5.751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the political vision and imperial administration projects related to tasks and objectives of the Russian colonisation of Turkestan in the second half of the nineteenth – early twentieth centuries. The author singles out categories of colonists and their objectives and discusses the difficulties behind the realisation of the imperial settlement project. Special attention is paid to the methods used to realise the development of conquered Turkestan, which combined the use of religious differences in population administration (the concept of “confessional state” by P. Werth) and emerging and expanding national discourse. Earlier studies closely examined the stages and numbers of the resettlement movement to Turkestan but did not consider how the imperial and Turkestan administration perceived the realisation of the region’s development. The research describes the points of view of imperial officials, supervisors, and inspectors of the resettlement processes to Turkestan and the adaptation of the imperial agents. The author refers to unpublished materials (recordkeeping, narrative, etc.) from the funds of the Central State Archive of the Republic of Uzbekistan, introduced into scholarly circulation for the first time. They make it possible to show the difficulties faced by Russia in realising its colonisation strategies in Turkestan, different assessments of colonists’ potential, and problems which were the subject of departmental correspondence of the Turkestan civil authorities. The author concludes that there was a considerable discrepancy between the political objectives and tasks of the Russian settler movement in Turkestan defined by imperial administration and the implementation of the project connected with the social-economic and cultural adaptation of Orthodox settlers in the region. The analysis of documents makes it possible to reconstruct the complex problems of the imperial project of the use of religious and national identity as a cultural basis of the civilizing mission in Turkestan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“为俄罗斯事业而战”:帝国对土耳其斯坦的殖民
本文考虑了与19世纪下半叶至20世纪初俄罗斯在土耳其斯坦殖民的任务和目标相关的政治愿景和帝国管理项目。作者梳理了殖民者的类别及其目的,并探讨了帝国殖民工程实现背后的困难。特别关注的是用来实现被征服的突厥斯坦的发展的方法,它结合了人口管理中宗教差异的使用(P. Werth的“忏悔国家”概念)和新兴和扩大的民族话语。早期的研究仔细研究了移民到突厥斯坦的阶段和数量,但没有考虑帝国和突厥斯坦政府如何看待该地区发展的实现。该研究描述了帝国官员、监事和检查员对土耳其斯坦移民过程的看法以及帝国代理人的适应。作者引用了乌兹别克斯坦共和国中央国家档案馆资金中首次引入学术流通的未出版材料(记录、叙述等)。它们可以显示俄罗斯在突厥斯坦实现其殖民战略时所面临的困难,对殖民者潜力的不同评估,以及突厥斯坦民事当局部门通信主题的问题。作者的结论是,帝国行政当局确定的土耳其斯坦俄罗斯定居者运动的政治目标和任务与该地区东正教定居者的社会经济和文化适应项目的执行之间存在相当大的差异。通过对文献的分析,可以重建帝国计划的复杂问题,即利用宗教和民族认同作为土耳其斯坦文明使命的文化基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestio Rossica
Quaestio Rossica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Quaestio Rossica is a peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the study of Russia’s history, philology, and culture. The Journal aims to introduce new research approaches in the sphere of the Humanities and previously unknown sources, actualising traditional methods and creating new research concepts in the sphere of Russian studies. Except for academic articles, the Journal publishes reviews, historical surveys, discussions, and accounts of the past of the Humanities as a field.
期刊最新文献
Ancient Heritage in the History of the Synod by Paisius Ligarides, Metropolitan of Gaza: Dedication to the Russian Tsar An Uncompleted Machine-Building Giant in the Urals: Mobilisation Policy and Construction Practice Between Russia and Western Europe: The Diplomatic Languages of Prince Ivan Scherbatov, a Russian Representative at the Spanish Court Il parlait assez bien français et plusieurs langues: Foreign Language Acquisition and the Diplomatic Self-Fashioning of Prince Boris Ivanovich Kurakin The Fifth Kingdom, Yuri Buida’s Historiographical Metafiction: Mystification of Historical Conceptualisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1