'Pervasive Participation – New Horizons for Citizen Involvement and User Experience'

Pub Date : 2017-12-20 DOI:10.55612/s-5002-035-001pfs
Sarah-Kristin Thiel, Peter Fröhlich, Matthias Baldauf, Glenda Amayo Caldwell
{"title":"'Pervasive Participation – New Horizons for Citizen Involvement and User Experience'","authors":"Sarah-Kristin Thiel, Peter Fröhlich, Matthias Baldauf, Glenda Amayo Caldwell","doi":"10.55612/s-5002-035-001pfs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, various governments across the globe have invested in efforts aimed at a more participatory governance that would bring citizens and representatives closer together while benefiting both sides. These efforts include informing citizens about ongoing and future plans in city making, facilitating dialogues between those two groups, as well as empowering citizens to resolve issues themselves. Holding advantages for the different stakeholders, involving citizens in various stages of decision-making processes might not only increase transparency and eventually trust, but also raise their acceptance of the decisions being made. The aim is to ultimately improve satisfaction and the quality of life [1]. Recent technological advances in participation processes allow the ability to place the efforts described above into practice. In an attempt to also mitigate common barriers to engagement (e.g. spatial, temporal; [2]), practitioners and scholars have started to move away from traditional approaches to public participation and towards technology-mediated approaches, referred to as e-participation [3]. In essence, this approach describes the utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) to broaden and deepen participation in policy development processes [4]. ICT enables citizens to connect with one another as well as with their elected representatives with little effort. However, the challenge is to engage them and capture their interests. The first generation of tools facilitating citizen engagement employed were geographic information systems (GIS). These allowed citizens to respond to questions from the city administration concerning particular locations in the city (e.g. where to build new bikeways). GIS tools mainly provided citizens with information on ongoing and current plans as well as gave them the opportunity to provide feedback on those. To that extent, these map-based engagement tools in their original form and function implemented an information provision and top-down engagement [5]. A practical restriction of GIS-based engagement systems is that due to their complexity (i.e. detailed maps) they are usually best viewed on larger screens or laptops. Although GIS-based systems allow engagement anytime while mitigating barriers of traditional engagement forms (e.g. opening hours of town hall meetings), they are still place-bound. The same issue applies to early web-based engagement platforms. However, these allowed citizens to not only respond to predefined topics but also introduce their own concerns by raising issues and proposing ideas, hence enabling bottom-up engagement. In this focus section, we present the current state and new horizons for the next generation of e-participation: Pervasive Participation [6]. The goal of this research field is to unleash the potential of feature-rich smartphones and instrumented urban environments for the domain of citizen engagement. The main idea of this concept is to enable inclusive, efficient and sustainable engagement by mitigating traditional barriers to participation. Hope put into pervasive participation pertains to providing Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal IxD&A, N.35, 2017, pp. 135-140","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-035-001pfs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, various governments across the globe have invested in efforts aimed at a more participatory governance that would bring citizens and representatives closer together while benefiting both sides. These efforts include informing citizens about ongoing and future plans in city making, facilitating dialogues between those two groups, as well as empowering citizens to resolve issues themselves. Holding advantages for the different stakeholders, involving citizens in various stages of decision-making processes might not only increase transparency and eventually trust, but also raise their acceptance of the decisions being made. The aim is to ultimately improve satisfaction and the quality of life [1]. Recent technological advances in participation processes allow the ability to place the efforts described above into practice. In an attempt to also mitigate common barriers to engagement (e.g. spatial, temporal; [2]), practitioners and scholars have started to move away from traditional approaches to public participation and towards technology-mediated approaches, referred to as e-participation [3]. In essence, this approach describes the utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) to broaden and deepen participation in policy development processes [4]. ICT enables citizens to connect with one another as well as with their elected representatives with little effort. However, the challenge is to engage them and capture their interests. The first generation of tools facilitating citizen engagement employed were geographic information systems (GIS). These allowed citizens to respond to questions from the city administration concerning particular locations in the city (e.g. where to build new bikeways). GIS tools mainly provided citizens with information on ongoing and current plans as well as gave them the opportunity to provide feedback on those. To that extent, these map-based engagement tools in their original form and function implemented an information provision and top-down engagement [5]. A practical restriction of GIS-based engagement systems is that due to their complexity (i.e. detailed maps) they are usually best viewed on larger screens or laptops. Although GIS-based systems allow engagement anytime while mitigating barriers of traditional engagement forms (e.g. opening hours of town hall meetings), they are still place-bound. The same issue applies to early web-based engagement platforms. However, these allowed citizens to not only respond to predefined topics but also introduce their own concerns by raising issues and proposing ideas, hence enabling bottom-up engagement. In this focus section, we present the current state and new horizons for the next generation of e-participation: Pervasive Participation [6]. The goal of this research field is to unleash the potential of feature-rich smartphones and instrumented urban environments for the domain of citizen engagement. The main idea of this concept is to enable inclusive, efficient and sustainable engagement by mitigating traditional barriers to participation. Hope put into pervasive participation pertains to providing Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal IxD&A, N.35, 2017, pp. 135-140
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
“普及参与——公民参与和用户体验的新视野”
在过去的十年里,全球各国政府都在努力实现更具参与性的治理,使公民和代表更加紧密地团结在一起,同时使双方都受益。这些努力包括让公民了解正在进行的和未来的城市规划,促进这两个群体之间的对话,以及赋予公民自己解决问题的权力。为不同的利益相关者提供优势,让公民参与决策过程的各个阶段,不仅可以提高透明度并最终提高信任,还可以提高他们对所做决定的接受度。其目的是最终提高满意度和生活质量[1]。参与进程的最新技术进步使上述努力得以付诸实践。为了缓解参与的常见障碍(如空间、时间;[2]),从业者和学者已经开始从传统的公众参与方法转向技术中介的方法,称为电子参与[3]。从本质上讲,这种方法描述了利用信息和通信技术来扩大和深化对政策制定过程的参与[4]。信息和通信技术使公民能够毫不费力地相互联系以及与当选代表联系。然而,挑战在于让他们参与进来并获取他们的利益。第一代促进公民参与的工具是地理信息系统。这使市民能够回答城市管理部门关于城市特定地点的问题(例如,在哪里修建新的自行车道)。地理信息系统工具主要为公民提供有关正在进行和当前计划的信息,并让他们有机会对这些计划提供反馈。在这种程度上,这些基于地图的参与工具以其原始形式和功能实现了信息提供和自上而下的参与[5]。基于GIS的参与系统的一个实际限制是,由于其复杂性(即详细的地图),通常最好在较大的屏幕或笔记本电脑上查看。尽管基于地理信息系统的系统允许随时参与,同时减少传统参与形式的障碍(例如市政厅会议的开放时间),但它们仍然局限于地方。同样的问题也适用于早期基于网络的参与平台。然而,这些措施不仅使公民能够对预先确定的主题做出回应,还可以通过提出问题和提出想法来介绍他们自己的担忧,从而实现自下而上的参与。在本重点部分中,我们介绍了下一代电子参与的现状和新视野:普遍参与[6]。该研究领域的目标是释放功能丰富的智能手机和仪表化城市环境在公民参与领域的潜力。这一概念的主要思想是通过减少传统的参与障碍,实现包容性、高效和可持续的参与。普遍参与的希望与提供交互设计与建筑有关。《IxD&A期刊》,2017年第35期,第135-140页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1