ABUSE OF PROTECTION OF PERSONAL RIGHTS – REMARKS DE LEGE FERENDA

Probacja Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.8768
Kamil Zaradkiewicz
{"title":"ABUSE OF PROTECTION OF PERSONAL RIGHTS – REMARKS DE LEGE FERENDA","authors":"Kamil Zaradkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is a proposal to supplement the provisions of the Civil Code regulating the instruments of both peculiar and non-peculiar protection of personal sphere (human personality). It is about removing the effects of breach (Art. 24 of the Civil Code) and the institution of compensation for non-pecuniary damage (Art. 448 of the Civil Code). The current general approach of the Code does not indicate the criteria that each time should be followed by the court granting appropriate protection. In practice, this often leads to doubts as to whether the adjudicated protection measure remains adequate on the one hand, and whether it does not constitute an excessive burden (primarily financial) for one, who is responsible on the other hand. The practice also provides numerous examples that sometimes the pursuit of claims for infringement of personal rights is more of a harassment for the defendant than a source of compensation for the aggrieved party. An important example of such irregularities is the phenomenon of so-called SLAPP. The article presents proposals for normative solutions that would allow to avoid the negative effects of these phenomena to a significante\n\n","PeriodicalId":34028,"journal":{"name":"Probacja","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is a proposal to supplement the provisions of the Civil Code regulating the instruments of both peculiar and non-peculiar protection of personal sphere (human personality). It is about removing the effects of breach (Art. 24 of the Civil Code) and the institution of compensation for non-pecuniary damage (Art. 448 of the Civil Code). The current general approach of the Code does not indicate the criteria that each time should be followed by the court granting appropriate protection. In practice, this often leads to doubts as to whether the adjudicated protection measure remains adequate on the one hand, and whether it does not constitute an excessive burden (primarily financial) for one, who is responsible on the other hand. The practice also provides numerous examples that sometimes the pursuit of claims for infringement of personal rights is more of a harassment for the defendant than a source of compensation for the aggrieved party. An important example of such irregularities is the phenomenon of so-called SLAPP. The article presents proposals for normative solutions that would allow to avoid the negative effects of these phenomena to a significante
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滥用个人权利保护-法律陈述
该条的目的是建议补充《民法典》中关于个人领域(人格)特殊和非特殊保护文书的规定。它是关于消除违约的影响(民法典第24条)和非金钱损害赔偿制度(民法典第448条)。《治罪法》目前的一般做法并没有指明每次给予适当保护的法院应遵循的标准。在实践中,这常常引起怀疑,一方面,已裁决的保护措施是否仍然足够,另一方面,它是否对负有责任的一方构成过度负担(主要是财政负担)。这种做法还提供了许多例子,表明有时追究侵犯个人权利的索赔对被告来说更像是一种骚扰,而不是对受害方的赔偿来源。这种不规则现象的一个重要例子是所谓的SLAPP现象。本文提出了规范性解决办法的建议,这些解决办法将使这些现象的负面影响得以大大避免
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and criminal behavior: a psychological profile of convicts serving custodial sentences. Pilot studies Basics of improving special protection for convicted persons – critical remarks Firmant and the problem of identifying a taxpayer in an organized criminal group Criminal law protection of religious freedom amid contemporary challenges and threats Forfission of an enterprise and the burd of proof in criminal process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1