Growth in floor area: the blind spot in cutting carbon

David Ness
{"title":"Growth in floor area: the blind spot in cutting carbon","authors":"David Ness","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.13420.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While most efforts to combat climate change are focussed on energy efficiency and substitution of fossil fuels, growth in the built environment remains largely unquestioned. Given the current climate emergency and increasing scarcity of global resources, it is imperative that we address this ‘blind spot’ by finding ways to support required services with less resource consumption. There is now long overdue recognition to greenhouse gas emissions ‘embodied’ in the production of building materials and construction, and its importance in reaching targets of net zero carbon by 2050. However, there is a widespread belief that we can continue to ‘build big’, provided we incorporate energy saving measures and select ‘low carbon materials’ − ignoring the fact that excessive volume and area of buildings may outweigh any carbon savings. This is especially the case with commercial real estate. As the inception and planning phases of projects offer most potential for reduction in both operational and embodied carbon, we must turn our attention to previously overlooked options such as ‘build nothing’ or ‘build less’. This involves challenging the root cause of the need, exploring alternative approaches to meet desired outcomes, and maximising the use of existing assets. If new build is required, this should be designed for adaptability, with increased stewardship, so the building stock of the future will be a more valuable and useable resource. This points to the need for increased understanding and application of the principles of strategic asset management, hitherto largely ignored in sustainability circles, which emphasize a close alignment of assets with the services they support. Arguably, as the built environment consumes more material resources and energy than any other sector, its future configuration may be critical to the future of people and the planet. In this regard, this paper seeks to break new ground for deeper exploration.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13420.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

While most efforts to combat climate change are focussed on energy efficiency and substitution of fossil fuels, growth in the built environment remains largely unquestioned. Given the current climate emergency and increasing scarcity of global resources, it is imperative that we address this ‘blind spot’ by finding ways to support required services with less resource consumption. There is now long overdue recognition to greenhouse gas emissions ‘embodied’ in the production of building materials and construction, and its importance in reaching targets of net zero carbon by 2050. However, there is a widespread belief that we can continue to ‘build big’, provided we incorporate energy saving measures and select ‘low carbon materials’ − ignoring the fact that excessive volume and area of buildings may outweigh any carbon savings. This is especially the case with commercial real estate. As the inception and planning phases of projects offer most potential for reduction in both operational and embodied carbon, we must turn our attention to previously overlooked options such as ‘build nothing’ or ‘build less’. This involves challenging the root cause of the need, exploring alternative approaches to meet desired outcomes, and maximising the use of existing assets. If new build is required, this should be designed for adaptability, with increased stewardship, so the building stock of the future will be a more valuable and useable resource. This points to the need for increased understanding and application of the principles of strategic asset management, hitherto largely ignored in sustainability circles, which emphasize a close alignment of assets with the services they support. Arguably, as the built environment consumes more material resources and energy than any other sector, its future configuration may be critical to the future of people and the planet. In this regard, this paper seeks to break new ground for deeper exploration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑面积增长:碳减排的盲点
虽然大多数应对气候变化的努力都集中在能源效率和化石燃料的替代上,但建筑环境的增长在很大程度上仍然是毋庸置疑的。鉴于当前的气候紧急情况和全球资源日益短缺,我们必须通过寻找以更少的资源消耗支持所需服务的方法来解决这一“盲点”。人们早就认识到温室气体排放“体现”在建筑材料和建筑的生产中,以及到2050年实现净零碳排放目标的重要性。然而,人们普遍认为,只要我们采取节能措施并选择“低碳材料”,我们就可以继续“建大”,而忽视了建筑体积和面积过大可能超过任何碳节约的事实。商业地产尤其如此。由于项目的启动和规划阶段提供了减少运营碳和隐含碳的最大潜力,我们必须将注意力转向以前被忽视的选项,如“不建造”或“少建造”。这包括挑战需求的根本原因,探索满足预期结果的替代方法,并最大限度地利用现有资产。如果需要新的建筑,应该设计为适应性,增加管理,因此未来的建筑库存将是更有价值和可用的资源。这表明需要加强对战略资产管理原则的理解和应用,迄今为止,这些原则在可持续性领域基本上被忽视,它们强调资产与其所支持的服务的紧密结合。可以说,由于建筑环境比任何其他部门消耗更多的材料资源和能源,其未来的配置可能对人类和地球的未来至关重要。在这方面,本文试图为更深入的探索开辟新天地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradoxes and dilemmas of responsible leadership in the mining industries of emerging economies – it is complex Secondary school teachers' perception of quality management practices in Ethiopia: Implications for quality education for all On the global emergence of responsible leadership: purpose and social identity Estimating annual average daily traffic (AADT) data on low-volume roads with the cokriging technique and census/population data Family violence screening and disclosure response: A public mental health service consumer survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1