Reclaiming the World: Hartmut Rosa's Theory of Resonance

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.46992/pijp.24.2.a.5
Ian Raymond Pacquing
{"title":"Reclaiming the World: Hartmut Rosa's Theory of Resonance","authors":"Ian Raymond Pacquing","doi":"10.46992/pijp.24.2.a.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes Rosa's theory of resonance as a viable alternative to a meaningful and purposive life. The relentless pressures of modern living have led us towards a dissonant existence. Despite the scientific advances and technological innovations, the modern world has provided, life has become too burdensome. The world becomes a silent, cold, and rigid haven where our social relationships are alienated. Alienated relations separate and disconnect us from our everyday affairs, which are supposed to be essential for growth and productivity. We are cut off and unable to use our human powers to connect with the world. Alienation detaches us and our surrounding environment, and thus, it seems that no meaningful experiences can ever be achieved. Hence, in this paper, I offer Rosa's resonance as a point of looking at the world from another angle. I argue with Rosa that only when we are touched and moved by our daily affairs do we become self-efficacious and thus empowered to improve and reclaim a sense of the world. Unlike in alienated experiences, only when we are rooted, affirmed, and validated by our society can we partake and share a segment of the world. The endless social debates that we do remain to be theories unless they touch and move us from within. This is where I think Rosa's version of critical theory emerges to be relevant in our times. What really matters, he says, is what goes on in our daily affairs. In our world of social relations, we either resonate or are alienated by the things surrounding us. As Rosa argues, if we resonate, we allow ourselves to be one with the world, creating harmony and unity, which call us to respond to the call of our times.","PeriodicalId":40692,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46992/pijp.24.2.a.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper takes Rosa's theory of resonance as a viable alternative to a meaningful and purposive life. The relentless pressures of modern living have led us towards a dissonant existence. Despite the scientific advances and technological innovations, the modern world has provided, life has become too burdensome. The world becomes a silent, cold, and rigid haven where our social relationships are alienated. Alienated relations separate and disconnect us from our everyday affairs, which are supposed to be essential for growth and productivity. We are cut off and unable to use our human powers to connect with the world. Alienation detaches us and our surrounding environment, and thus, it seems that no meaningful experiences can ever be achieved. Hence, in this paper, I offer Rosa's resonance as a point of looking at the world from another angle. I argue with Rosa that only when we are touched and moved by our daily affairs do we become self-efficacious and thus empowered to improve and reclaim a sense of the world. Unlike in alienated experiences, only when we are rooted, affirmed, and validated by our society can we partake and share a segment of the world. The endless social debates that we do remain to be theories unless they touch and move us from within. This is where I think Rosa's version of critical theory emerges to be relevant in our times. What really matters, he says, is what goes on in our daily affairs. In our world of social relations, we either resonate or are alienated by the things surrounding us. As Rosa argues, if we resonate, we allow ourselves to be one with the world, creating harmony and unity, which call us to respond to the call of our times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重塑世界:哈特穆特·罗莎的共振理论
本文将罗莎的共振理论作为一种有意义和有目的的生活的可行替代方案。现代生活的无情压力使我们走向了一种不和谐的存在。尽管现代世界提供了科学进步和技术创新,但生活变得过于繁重。这个世界变成了一个沉默、冰冷、僵化的避难所,我们的社会关系在这里被疏远了。异化的关系使我们与日常事务分离开来,而日常事务本应对增长和生产力至关重要。我们被切断了联系,无法利用我们的人力与世界联系。异化使我们和周围的环境分离,因此,似乎永远无法获得有意义的体验。因此,在本文中,我将罗莎的共鸣作为一种从另一个角度看待世界的观点。我和罗莎争辩说,只有当我们被日常事务感动和感动时,我们才会变得自我效能,从而有能力改善和恢复对世界的感觉。与被疏远的经历不同,只有当我们被社会扎根、肯定和认可时,我们才能分享和分享世界的一部分。我们所做的无休止的社会辩论仍然是理论,除非它们从内部触及并推动我们。这就是我认为罗莎的批判理论在我们这个时代的意义所在。他说,真正重要的是我们的日常事务。在我们的社会关系世界里,我们要么与周围的事物产生共鸣,要么被周围的事物疏远。正如罗莎所说,如果我们产生共鸣,我们就会让自己与世界融为一体,创造和谐与团结,这就要求我们响应时代的呼唤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Discounting Utility Without Complaints: Avoiding the Demandingness of Classical Utilitarianism The Assemble of Olympism and Nationalism: Social Philosophical Analysis of Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games as Case Study Distinguishing Models of Kierkegaard’s Indirect Communication: Toward a Clearer View of a Multivalent Discourse Technique Ubuntu as an Ethical Framework in Business Ethics for African Socio-Economic Development Spinoza: Desire and Supreme Good, from Philosophizing to Wise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1