The challenges of implementing evidence-based strategies to inform building and urban design decisions: a view from current practice

IF 2.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Design and Technology Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0003
Avgousta Stanitsa, S. Hallett, S. Jude
{"title":"The challenges of implementing evidence-based strategies to inform building and urban design decisions: a view from current practice","authors":"Avgousta Stanitsa, S. Hallett, S. Jude","doi":"10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to raise awareness of the key challenges, opportunities and priorities for evidence-based strategies’ application to inform building and urban design decisions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses deductive qualitative content and manifest analysis, using semi-structured interviews undertaken with building and urban design professionals who represent a UK-based organisation.\n\n\nFindings\nThe challenges associated with the practical implementation of frameworks, potential application areas and perceived areas of concern have been identified. These not only include the need to practically test their use, but also to identify the most appropriate forums for their use. Participant responses indicate the need to further develop engagement strategies for their practical implementation, clearly communicating the benefits and efficiencies to all stakeholders.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nImplications/ limitations of this study come with the fact that some of the respondents may possess inadequate professional experience in properly evaluating all the questions. Additionally, the information gathered is restricted to the UK geographical context, as well as coming from one organisation, because of data accessibility.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of the study can be adopted by designers in the strategic definition level to overcome the key challenges associated with the use of evidence-based strategies, enhancing their decision-making processes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs a theoretical contribution to knowledge, this study enhances the body of knowledge by identifying the challenges associated with the practical implementation of evidence-based strategies to inform building and urban design decisions. In practice, the findings aid urban planners, designers and academics in embedding and adopting strategies that enhance decision-making processes.\n","PeriodicalId":46533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to raise awareness of the key challenges, opportunities and priorities for evidence-based strategies’ application to inform building and urban design decisions. Design/methodology/approach This study uses deductive qualitative content and manifest analysis, using semi-structured interviews undertaken with building and urban design professionals who represent a UK-based organisation. Findings The challenges associated with the practical implementation of frameworks, potential application areas and perceived areas of concern have been identified. These not only include the need to practically test their use, but also to identify the most appropriate forums for their use. Participant responses indicate the need to further develop engagement strategies for their practical implementation, clearly communicating the benefits and efficiencies to all stakeholders. Research limitations/implications Implications/ limitations of this study come with the fact that some of the respondents may possess inadequate professional experience in properly evaluating all the questions. Additionally, the information gathered is restricted to the UK geographical context, as well as coming from one organisation, because of data accessibility. Practical implications The findings of the study can be adopted by designers in the strategic definition level to overcome the key challenges associated with the use of evidence-based strategies, enhancing their decision-making processes. Originality/value As a theoretical contribution to knowledge, this study enhances the body of knowledge by identifying the challenges associated with the practical implementation of evidence-based strategies to inform building and urban design decisions. In practice, the findings aid urban planners, designers and academics in embedding and adopting strategies that enhance decision-making processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从当前实践看实施循证战略为建筑和城市设计决策提供信息的挑战
目的本研究旨在提高人们对循证策略应用于建筑和城市设计决策的关键挑战、机遇和优先事项的认识。设计/方法论/方法本研究使用演绎定性内容和显性分析,使用对代表英国组织的建筑和城市设计专业人员进行的半结构化访谈。发现已经确定了与框架的实际实施、潜在应用领域和感知的关注领域相关的挑战。这不仅包括需要实际测试它们的使用,还包括确定最适合使用它们的论坛。参与者的回答表明,需要进一步制定参与战略,以便实际实施,并向所有利益相关者明确传达利益和效率。研究局限性/含义本研究的含义/局限性来自于这样一个事实,即一些受访者可能在正确评估所有问题方面缺乏专业经验。此外,由于数据的可访问性,收集的信息仅限于英国的地理环境,也仅来自一个组织。实际含义设计师可以在战略定义层面采用该研究的结果,以克服与使用循证战略相关的关键挑战,增强他们的决策过程。原创性/价值作为对知识的理论贡献,本研究通过确定与实际实施循证战略相关的挑战来增强知识体系,为建筑和城市设计决策提供信息。在实践中,这些发现有助于城市规划者、设计师和学者嵌入和采用增强决策过程的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: - Design strategies - Usability and adaptability - Material, component and systems performance - Process control - Alternative and new technologies - Organizational, management and research issues - Human factors - Environmental, quality and health and safety issues - Cost and life cycle issues - Sustainability criteria, indicators, measurement and practices - Risk management - Entrepreneurship Law, regulation and governance - Design, implementing, managing and practicing innovation - Visualization, simulation, information and communication technologies - Education practices, innovation, strategies and policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a framework for improving health and safety risk management at informal construction sites in Tanzania Impact of project risk allocation on PPP housing project delivery in Nigeria: partial least square structural equation modeling approach Ensemble of ensembles for fine particulate matter pollution prediction using big data analytics and IoT emission sensors Resource sustainability in the water, energy and food nexus: role of technological innovation Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of structural concrete containing RCA treated with sodium metasilicate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1