Determinants of intensive care unit admission of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: An analytic retrospective cohort

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_48_21
S. Alqutub, W. Albalawi, N. Alrajhi
{"title":"Determinants of intensive care unit admission of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: An analytic retrospective cohort","authors":"S. Alqutub, W. Albalawi, N. Alrajhi","doi":"10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_48_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In March 2020, Saudi Arabia (KSA) experienced a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. The mitigation strategy aimed to reduce both the impact on vulnerable groups and the risk of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Risk factors, such as sequential organ failure, comorbidities, ventilation, and mortality, have not been described in different settings of care. Materials and Methods: A multicenter, retrospective chart review of 220 adults with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU included demographics and ICU admission factors (e.g., quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, ventilator status, comorbidities, days from laboratory confirmation to ICU admission, and days from hospitalization to ICU admission). Regression was utilized to identify predictors of need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and mortality in ICU patients. Results: ICU admission, COVID-19 hospital mortality, and ventilator-associated mortality rates were 26.5%, 44%, and 30.5%, respectively. The mean patients' age was 30 years. Across four cities, Jeddah patients were at the highest risk of MV (<0.001). Within the 1st day of hospitalization, without lymphocytopenia, non-Saudi patients with a qSOFA score of 2 and 3 were at the highest risk of ventilation (odds ratio [OR], 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72–8.66; OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 2.35–55.47; and OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.0–37.33, respectively). Moreover, within the same period of hospital stay, mechanically-ventilated patients with a qSOFA score of 3 who received antiviral medications were significantly at the higher risk of death (OR, 2.8.4; 95% CI, 1.44–5.64; OR, 13.1; 95% CI, 1.23–39.68; and OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.14–4.14, respectively). Conclusions: The 1st day of hospitalization, along with an assessment of the dyspnea status using the qSOFA score, is the window of opportunity for minimizing ICU admission risk. Neither lymphocytopenia nor comorbidities are associated with the risk of mechanical ventilation. Factors were also discussed. Reviews are needed on the indications for the use of antiviral agents, intubation, and ventilation in hospitalized patients.","PeriodicalId":13067,"journal":{"name":"Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"127 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_48_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In March 2020, Saudi Arabia (KSA) experienced a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. The mitigation strategy aimed to reduce both the impact on vulnerable groups and the risk of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Risk factors, such as sequential organ failure, comorbidities, ventilation, and mortality, have not been described in different settings of care. Materials and Methods: A multicenter, retrospective chart review of 220 adults with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU included demographics and ICU admission factors (e.g., quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, ventilator status, comorbidities, days from laboratory confirmation to ICU admission, and days from hospitalization to ICU admission). Regression was utilized to identify predictors of need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and mortality in ICU patients. Results: ICU admission, COVID-19 hospital mortality, and ventilator-associated mortality rates were 26.5%, 44%, and 30.5%, respectively. The mean patients' age was 30 years. Across four cities, Jeddah patients were at the highest risk of MV (<0.001). Within the 1st day of hospitalization, without lymphocytopenia, non-Saudi patients with a qSOFA score of 2 and 3 were at the highest risk of ventilation (odds ratio [OR], 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72–8.66; OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 2.35–55.47; and OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.0–37.33, respectively). Moreover, within the same period of hospital stay, mechanically-ventilated patients with a qSOFA score of 3 who received antiviral medications were significantly at the higher risk of death (OR, 2.8.4; 95% CI, 1.44–5.64; OR, 13.1; 95% CI, 1.23–39.68; and OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.14–4.14, respectively). Conclusions: The 1st day of hospitalization, along with an assessment of the dyspnea status using the qSOFA score, is the window of opportunity for minimizing ICU admission risk. Neither lymphocytopenia nor comorbidities are associated with the risk of mechanical ventilation. Factors were also discussed. Reviews are needed on the indications for the use of antiviral agents, intubation, and ventilation in hospitalized patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯COVID-19住院患者入住重症监护病房的决定因素:回顾性队列分析
背景:2020年3月,沙特阿拉伯(KSA)爆发了2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。缓解战略旨在减少对弱势群体的影响和入住重症监护病房(ICU)的风险。危险因素,如序贯器官衰竭、合并症、通气和死亡率,尚未在不同的护理环境中描述。材料和方法:对220例入住ICU的成人COVID-19患者进行多中心回顾性图表回顾,包括人口统计学和ICU入院因素(例如,快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分、呼吸机状态、合并症、从实验室确认到ICU入院的天数、从住院到ICU入院的天数)。采用回归方法确定ICU患者机械通气需求(MV)和死亡率的预测因子。结果:ICU住院率、COVID-19住院死亡率和呼吸机相关死亡率分别为26.5%、44%和30.5%。患者平均年龄30岁。在四个城市中,吉达患者的MV风险最高(<0.001)。在住院第1天,无淋巴细胞减少症,qSOFA评分为2分和3分的非沙特患者通气风险最高(优势比[OR], 3.9;95%置信区间[CI], 1.72-8.66;或者,11.4;95% ci, 2.35-55.47;and OR, 6.1;95% CI分别为1.0-37.33)。此外,在相同的住院时间内,qSOFA评分为3分的机械通气患者接受抗病毒药物治疗的死亡风险明显更高(OR, 2.8.4;95% ci, 1.44-5.64;或者,13.1;95% ci, 1.23-39.68;OR, 2.2;95% CI分别为1.14-4.14)。结论:住院第一天,以及使用qSOFA评分评估呼吸困难状态,是将ICU入院风险降至最低的机会之窗。淋巴细胞减少症和合并症都与机械通气的风险无关。并对影响因素进行了讨论。需要对住院患者使用抗病毒药物、插管和通气的适应症进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Academic Medical Career versus Private Medical Practice: A Guide to the Right Decision! Expecting the Unexpected: Schistosomial Appendicitis in Nonendemic Area Causes of Original Kidney Disease among Libyan Kidney Transplant Recipients IJMBS at the End of 2023: An Impact Factor and a New Platform Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1