Openness to experience is stable following adversity: A case-control longitudinal investigation

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL European Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.1177/08902070221076902
M. Forgeard, Ann Marie Roepke, Sara Atlas, Elana Bayer-Pacht, T. Björgvinsson, P. Silvia
{"title":"Openness to experience is stable following adversity: A case-control longitudinal investigation","authors":"M. Forgeard, Ann Marie Roepke, Sara Atlas, Elana Bayer-Pacht, T. Björgvinsson, P. Silvia","doi":"10.1177/08902070221076902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many people retrospectively report feeling more open-minded after experiencing highly stressful events, relevant longitudinal studies are scarce and have yielded contradictory findings. The present study used a 12-month longitudinal case-control design to test whether growth in openness (assessed every 4 months using multiple methods) occurs following major stressors, and whether changes relate to clinical symptoms of depression and/or posttraumatic stress. To do so, we compared participants (a) with a recent major stressor and with low symptoms (n = 66), (b) without a recent major stressor and with low symptoms (n = 76), and (c) with a recent major stressor and with significant symptoms (n = 76). Overall, growth curve models showed that group membership was not associated with changes in openness over 12 months for most outcomes. Other variables (e.g., education) predicted changes in openness. This study provides robust evidence that openness to experience is mostly stable following major stressors.","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":"36 1","pages":"483 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070221076902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although many people retrospectively report feeling more open-minded after experiencing highly stressful events, relevant longitudinal studies are scarce and have yielded contradictory findings. The present study used a 12-month longitudinal case-control design to test whether growth in openness (assessed every 4 months using multiple methods) occurs following major stressors, and whether changes relate to clinical symptoms of depression and/or posttraumatic stress. To do so, we compared participants (a) with a recent major stressor and with low symptoms (n = 66), (b) without a recent major stressor and with low symptoms (n = 76), and (c) with a recent major stressor and with significant symptoms (n = 76). Overall, growth curve models showed that group membership was not associated with changes in openness over 12 months for most outcomes. Other variables (e.g., education) predicted changes in openness. This study provides robust evidence that openness to experience is mostly stable following major stressors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对经验的开放性在逆境后是稳定的:一项病例对照纵向调查
尽管许多人在经历了高度紧张的事件后回忆说感觉更开放,但相关的纵向研究很少,并且得出了相互矛盾的结果。本研究采用12个月的纵向病例对照设计来测试开放性的增长(使用多种方法每4个月评估一次)是否发生在主要压力源之后,以及这种变化是否与抑郁和/或创伤后应激的临床症状有关。为此,我们比较了(a)最近有主要压力源且症状较轻的参与者(n = 66), (b)最近没有主要压力源且症状较轻的参与者(n = 76),以及(c)最近有主要压力源且症状较重的参与者(n = 76)。总体而言,增长曲线模型显示,在大多数结果中,组成员身份与12个月内开放性的变化无关。其他变量(如教育)预测了开放性的变化。这项研究提供了强有力的证据,表明经历的开放性在主要压力源后基本稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Personality
European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
8.50%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
期刊最新文献
From theory to research: Interpretational guidelines, statistical guidance, and a shiny app for the model of excellencism and perfectionism The complexity of the pursuit of happiness is associated with the success of well-being related behaviors in everyday life Personality is (so much) more than just self-reported Big Five traits My willpower belief and yours: Investigating dyadic associations between willpower beliefs, social support, and relationship satisfaction in couples Between- and within-person longitudinal associations between personality traits and social support across relationships during older adulthood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1