A prospective study to determine the incidence, clinical profile, and outcomes of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

Sagnik Bhattacharjee, A. Khyriem, C. Lyngdoh, A. Prasad
{"title":"A prospective study to determine the incidence, clinical profile, and outcomes of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia","authors":"Sagnik Bhattacharjee, A. Khyriem, C. Lyngdoh, A. Prasad","doi":"10.4103/ajim.ajim_95_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective was to determine the incidence, etiological agents, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: The prospective observational study was carried out on 146 adults admitted to the hospital, who were put on mechanical ventilation for a minimum period of 48 h at NEIGRIHMS, Shillong. The study was conducted for 1 year from December 2019 to December 2020. VAP was diagnosed as per the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. Demographic, clinical characteristics, culture reports, and antibiotic susceptibility of the patients were noted. Patients were followed up till discharge or death. Outcome measures were risk factors for VAP and mortality. Results: We report an incidence of VAP as 10.6/1000 ventilator days. The predominant organisms seen were Acinetobacter baumannii (62.33%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (47.26%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.18%). 33/146 (22.6%) patients expired, among which 17 patients had VAP (40.48% vs. 15.38%, P = 0.001). VAP patients had significantly higher odds of smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 2.412, P = 0.016), more polybacterial infections (OR = 2.271, P = 0.024), and more mortality (OR = 3.681, P = 0.001). Among the organisms, P. aeruginosa (OR = 0.115, P = 0.013) and K. pneumoniae (OR = 6.818, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with mortality in patients with VAP. Conclusion: We report an incidence of VAP as 10.6/1000 ventilator days among intensive care unit patients. Smoking was a significant risk factor for VAP. VAP patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality with K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa being significant organisms responsible for it.","PeriodicalId":8012,"journal":{"name":"APIK Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"179 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APIK Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajim.ajim_95_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to determine the incidence, etiological agents, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: The prospective observational study was carried out on 146 adults admitted to the hospital, who were put on mechanical ventilation for a minimum period of 48 h at NEIGRIHMS, Shillong. The study was conducted for 1 year from December 2019 to December 2020. VAP was diagnosed as per the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. Demographic, clinical characteristics, culture reports, and antibiotic susceptibility of the patients were noted. Patients were followed up till discharge or death. Outcome measures were risk factors for VAP and mortality. Results: We report an incidence of VAP as 10.6/1000 ventilator days. The predominant organisms seen were Acinetobacter baumannii (62.33%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (47.26%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.18%). 33/146 (22.6%) patients expired, among which 17 patients had VAP (40.48% vs. 15.38%, P = 0.001). VAP patients had significantly higher odds of smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 2.412, P = 0.016), more polybacterial infections (OR = 2.271, P = 0.024), and more mortality (OR = 3.681, P = 0.001). Among the organisms, P. aeruginosa (OR = 0.115, P = 0.013) and K. pneumoniae (OR = 6.818, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with mortality in patients with VAP. Conclusion: We report an incidence of VAP as 10.6/1000 ventilator days among intensive care unit patients. Smoking was a significant risk factor for VAP. VAP patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality with K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa being significant organisms responsible for it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项确定呼吸机相关肺炎患者发病率、临床特征和预后的前瞻性研究
目的:确定引起呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的分离株的发病率、病原学和抗生素敏感性模式。方法:对146名入院的成年人进行前瞻性观察研究,他们在Shillong的NEIGRIHMS接受了至少48小时的机械通气。该研究为期1年,从2019年12月至2020年12月。VAP根据临床肺部感染评分进行诊断。记录了患者的人口统计学、临床特征、培养报告和抗生素易感性。对患者进行随访,直至出院或死亡。结果指标是VAP和死亡率的危险因素。结果:我们报告VAP的发生率为10.6/1000呼吸机日。主要生物为鲍曼不动杆菌(62.33%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(47.26%)和铜绿假单胞菌(19.18%)。33/146(22.6%)患者过期,其中17名患者患有VAP(40.48%对15.38%,P=0.001)。VAP患者吸烟的几率显著更高(比值比[OR]=2.412,P=0.016),多菌感染的几率更多(OR=2.271,P=0.024),在生物体中,铜绿假单胞菌(OR=0.115,P=0.013)和肺炎克雷伯菌(OR=6.818,P=0.003)与VAP患者的死亡率显著相关。结论:我们报告重症监护病房患者VAP的发生率为10.6/1000呼吸机日。吸烟是VAP的重要危险因素。VAP患者的死亡率明显更高,肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌是造成VAP的重要生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial Correlates of Emotional Eating Among Healthcare Professionals in a Tertiary Care Centre in Mysuru Quiz in Undergraduate Curriculum and as Teaching–Learning Method: Why Not? Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma Protein B: A Potential Therapeutic Target in Chronic Intestinal Fibrosis Induced by Dextran Sulfate Sodium Glycated Hemoglobin as a Screening Tool in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus among Adult Patients in a Tertiary Health Facility in Port Harcourt, Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Mixed Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia - A Rare Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1