Comparing Bender-Gestalt Test and Quantitative Electroencephalography for Brain Trauma Diagnosis in Depressive and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders

Samaneh Shakeri, R. Bidaki, H. Mirhosseini, Mina Kiani
{"title":"Comparing Bender-Gestalt Test and Quantitative Electroencephalography for Brain Trauma Diagnosis in Depressive and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders","authors":"Samaneh Shakeri, R. Bidaki, H. Mirhosseini, Mina Kiani","doi":"10.34172/icnj.2021.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Some experts assert there is an association between traumatic brain injury and cognitive impairments such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depressive disorder. Furthermore, children and adults with ADHD struggle with focusing, organizing tasks, and feeling restless. They might experience sadness, guilt, irritability, low self-confidence and helplessness. In this regard, ADHD and depressive disorder occasionally occur together. We aimed to compare the clinical application of the Bender-Gestalt test (BGT) and electroencephalography in screening brain damage in the patients with the mentioned disorders. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study to assess diagnostic accuracy. Eighty patients with depression (n=35) and ADHD (n=45) resulting from brain damage aged 10-35 years who had been referred by the psychologist or psychiatrist to Imam Hossein Clinic in Yazd. Both the BGT and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) results existed in their files. Patients with any serious medical, other psychiatric disorders or history of drug dependency were excluded. Paired t test was used to analyze the differences. Results: The brain damage score was different in the two tests. Based on the paired t test, the BGT was a more valid screening test. Also, the score of the two tests were different in the depression and ADHD mean scores (P<0.05). Conclusion: BGT was a more reliable tool compared to QEEG for diagnosing brain damage within the patients with the mentioned disorders.","PeriodicalId":33222,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/icnj.2021.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some experts assert there is an association between traumatic brain injury and cognitive impairments such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depressive disorder. Furthermore, children and adults with ADHD struggle with focusing, organizing tasks, and feeling restless. They might experience sadness, guilt, irritability, low self-confidence and helplessness. In this regard, ADHD and depressive disorder occasionally occur together. We aimed to compare the clinical application of the Bender-Gestalt test (BGT) and electroencephalography in screening brain damage in the patients with the mentioned disorders. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study to assess diagnostic accuracy. Eighty patients with depression (n=35) and ADHD (n=45) resulting from brain damage aged 10-35 years who had been referred by the psychologist or psychiatrist to Imam Hossein Clinic in Yazd. Both the BGT and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) results existed in their files. Patients with any serious medical, other psychiatric disorders or history of drug dependency were excluded. Paired t test was used to analyze the differences. Results: The brain damage score was different in the two tests. Based on the paired t test, the BGT was a more valid screening test. Also, the score of the two tests were different in the depression and ADHD mean scores (P<0.05). Conclusion: BGT was a more reliable tool compared to QEEG for diagnosing brain damage within the patients with the mentioned disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲德格式塔测验与定量脑电图在抑郁症和注意缺陷多动障碍脑外伤诊断中的比较
背景:一些专家认为,创伤性脑损伤与认知障碍(如注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和抑郁症)之间存在关联。此外,患有多动症的儿童和成人在集中注意力、组织任务和感觉不安方面都很挣扎。他们可能会感到悲伤、内疚、易怒、缺乏自信和无助。在这方面,多动症和抑郁症偶尔会同时发生。我们的目的是比较Bender-Gestalt试验(BGT)和脑电图在筛查上述疾病患者脑损伤方面的临床应用。方法:这是一项评估诊断准确性的横断面研究。80名因脑损伤而患有抑郁症(n=35)和多动症(n=45)的患者,年龄在10-35岁之间,由心理学家或精神科医生转介到亚兹德的伊玛目侯赛因诊所。BGT和定量脑电图(QEEG)结果都存在于他们的档案中。有任何严重的医疗、其他精神疾病或药物依赖史的患者被排除在外。采用配对t检验分析差异。结果:两种测试的脑损伤评分不同。基于配对t检验,BGT是一个更有效的筛选测试。两项测验的抑郁和ADHD平均得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与QEEG相比,BGT是诊断上述疾病患者脑损伤的更可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Difficulties in Diagnosis and Operation Associated With Lumbar Intradural Disc Herniation: A Case Report EEG-Based Effective Connectivity Analysis for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Detection Using Color-Coded Granger-Causality Images and Custom Convolutional Neural Network The Relationship Between Arachnoid Cysts and the Subarachnoid Space by Hounsfield Unit Value in Computed Tomography Scans: Identification of Isolated and Communicating Arachnoid Cysts in a Cohort Study The Positive Effect of Atropa belladonna on Inflammatory Cytokines in the Animal Model of Multiple Sclerosis Unexpected Outcomes for Headache Under Evaluation; A Case Series of Four Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1