Capturing Sound or History? Understanding the 1928 Minzoku Geijutsu Transcription Debate

IF 0.2 2区 艺术学 0 ASIAN STUDIES ASIAN MUSIC Pub Date : 2019-01-08 DOI:10.1353/AMU.2019.0002
R. Miller
{"title":"Capturing Sound or History? Understanding the 1928 Minzoku Geijutsu Transcription Debate","authors":"R. Miller","doi":"10.1353/AMU.2019.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Debate over the procedures of ethnographic transcription have ranged from the technical to the philosophical, and, in more recent years, the goals of transcription have been considered against the backdrop of other debates over authenticity and representation. The debate in the pages of the 1928 Japanese folklore journal Minzoku geijutsu between composer Fujii Kiyomi (1889–1944) and shakuhachi historian Nakazuka Chikuzen (1887–1944) provides an exceptional opportunity to see our own practices from the outside. Fujii and Nakazuka's argument over the goals and procedures for the transcription of Japanese folk song takes an unusual trajectory through issues of style, sophistication, standardization, and form.","PeriodicalId":43622,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN MUSIC","volume":"50 1","pages":"28 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AMU.2019.0002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN MUSIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AMU.2019.0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Debate over the procedures of ethnographic transcription have ranged from the technical to the philosophical, and, in more recent years, the goals of transcription have been considered against the backdrop of other debates over authenticity and representation. The debate in the pages of the 1928 Japanese folklore journal Minzoku geijutsu between composer Fujii Kiyomi (1889–1944) and shakuhachi historian Nakazuka Chikuzen (1887–1944) provides an exceptional opportunity to see our own practices from the outside. Fujii and Nakazuka's argument over the goals and procedures for the transcription of Japanese folk song takes an unusual trajectory through issues of style, sophistication, standardization, and form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捕捉声音还是历史?1928年《民族艺文》抄写之争的解读
摘要:关于民族志转录程序的争论从技术到哲学都有,近年来,转录的目标是在其他关于真实性和再现性的争论的背景下考虑的。作曲家藤井清美(1889年-1944年)和沙八町历史学家中冢治虫(1887年-1944年间)在1928年日本民间文学杂志《日本民文学》上的辩论为我们从外部看到自己的实践提供了一个难得的机会。藤井和中冢关于日本民歌转录目标和程序的争论通过风格、复杂度、标准化和形式等问题走上了不同寻常的轨道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASIAN MUSIC
ASIAN MUSIC Multiple-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Reclaiming the Legacy of Merdana, a Kebyar Master Asian Music, the Asian Scholar, and Modern Asia: A Keynote Address Marty Regan: Selected Works for Japanese Instruments. Vol. 4, Lost Mountains, Quiet Valleys (review) The Pleasures of Parikan in Malang, East Java: An Analysis of Text and Music in the Dance Ngremo Putri Japan’s Musical Tradition: Hogaku from Prehistory to the Present by Miyuki Yoshikami (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1