Unveiling the Inequalities of Extracurricular Activities in Admissions

Julie J. Park, Jia Zheng, Brian H. Kim
{"title":"Unveiling the Inequalities of Extracurricular Activities in Admissions","authors":"Julie J. Park, Jia Zheng, Brian H. Kim","doi":"10.1080/00091383.2023.2235253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Short Many institutions adopted test-optional policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning that nonstandardized parts of the application may play a more influential role in admissions. Our research team examined extracurricular activities reporting in more than six million applications submitted from the Common Application dataset and found that White, Asian American, higher socioeconomic status, and private-school students reported more activities, more top-level leadership positions, and more activities with honors and awards. These disparities are influenced by inequitable access to extracurricular activities and the various dynamics of admissions at selective institutions. We recommend institutions reassess the weight that extracurricular activities are given in admissions, provide training for admissions staff, and for institutions and application platforms to consider reducing the maximum number of activities that students are allowed to list on their applications.","PeriodicalId":77065,"journal":{"name":"Change","volume":"55 1","pages":"45 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2023.2235253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Short Many institutions adopted test-optional policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning that nonstandardized parts of the application may play a more influential role in admissions. Our research team examined extracurricular activities reporting in more than six million applications submitted from the Common Application dataset and found that White, Asian American, higher socioeconomic status, and private-school students reported more activities, more top-level leadership positions, and more activities with honors and awards. These disparities are influenced by inequitable access to extracurricular activities and the various dynamics of admissions at selective institutions. We recommend institutions reassess the weight that extracurricular activities are given in admissions, provide training for admissions staff, and for institutions and application platforms to consider reducing the maximum number of activities that students are allowed to list on their applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭露招生中课外活动的不平等
简而言之,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多机构采用了非考试选择政策,这意味着申请中的非标准化部分可能在录取中发挥更大的作用。我们的研究团队检查了来自通用申请数据集的600多万份申请中的课外活动报告,发现白人、亚裔美国人、较高的社会经济地位和私立学校的学生报告了更多的活动,更多的高层领导职位,更多的荣誉和奖励活动。这些差异受到课外活动机会不公平以及名校录取的各种动态的影响。我们建议各院校重新评估课外活动在招生中的权重,为招生人员提供培训,并建议各院校和申请平台考虑减少学生在申请中允许列出的最大活动数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eight Indicators for Measuring Equitable Student Success in STEM. Unveiling the Inequalities of Extracurricular Activities in Admissions Defy, Deserve, Desire: Leading From the Margins in Higher Education Higher Education’s Response to the Climate Emergency Is Failing to Help Prepare Students for the Future of Work: Why Preparing Our Students for Lives and Careers Within a Disrupted Biosphere is a Critical, Sectorwide Responsibility What If the Faculty Are Not Alright? Burnout and Compassion Fatigue in Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1