A multi-level analysis of the direct and joint effects of gender and mode of disposition on sentencing in federal courts

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/1478601x.2019.1691001
Bryan Holmes
{"title":"A multi-level analysis of the direct and joint effects of gender and mode of disposition on sentencing in federal courts","authors":"Bryan Holmes","doi":"10.1080/1478601x.2019.1691001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current study examines the influence of defendant sex, mode of disposition, and sex-by-mode of disposition grouping on incarceration and sentence length decisions. In addition, this study examines contextual effects on the trial penalty for males and females. Generally, findings suggest that females receive more lenient sentences, those convicted via plea receive more lenient sentences, and males convicted via trial receive harsher sentences than all other sex-by-mode of disposition grouping. Analysis of cross-level interactions signify that districts which sentenced higher average offense levels had smaller trial penalties at the incarceration decision and larger trial penalties at the sentence length decision for both males and females. Meanwhile, no detectable influence of caseload size on the effect of sex, mode of disposition, and their intersections at either sentencing point was found. Implications for the study findings are discussed and future avenues of research are recommended.","PeriodicalId":45877,"journal":{"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES","volume":"33 1","pages":"373 - 393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1478601x.2019.1691001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601x.2019.1691001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current study examines the influence of defendant sex, mode of disposition, and sex-by-mode of disposition grouping on incarceration and sentence length decisions. In addition, this study examines contextual effects on the trial penalty for males and females. Generally, findings suggest that females receive more lenient sentences, those convicted via plea receive more lenient sentences, and males convicted via trial receive harsher sentences than all other sex-by-mode of disposition grouping. Analysis of cross-level interactions signify that districts which sentenced higher average offense levels had smaller trial penalties at the incarceration decision and larger trial penalties at the sentence length decision for both males and females. Meanwhile, no detectable influence of caseload size on the effect of sex, mode of disposition, and their intersections at either sentencing point was found. Implications for the study findings are discussed and future avenues of research are recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别和处刑方式对联邦法院量刑的直接和共同影响的多层次分析
摘要本研究考察了被告的性别、处置方式以及处置方式分组的性别对监禁和刑期决定的影响。此外,本研究还考察了情境对男性和女性审判刑罚的影响。总体而言,研究结果表明,按处置方式分组,女性得到的判决更为宽大,通过认罪被定罪的男性得到的判决更加宽大,通过审判被定罪的男子得到的判决比所有其他性别都要严厉。对跨层面互动的分析表明,对男性和女性来说,判处较高平均犯罪水平的地区在监禁决定时的审判处罚较小,在刑期决定时的审理处罚较大。同时,没有发现案件数量对性别、处置方式及其在两个量刑点的交叉点的影响。讨论了研究结果的含义,并建议了未来的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES
CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice Studies, a quarterly refereed journal, publishes articles that deal with substantive criminal justice and criminological issues. The journal welcomes all articles that are relevant to the issue of criminal justice, as well as those that may be outside the field but have relevancy to the topic of criminal justice. Articles that cover public administration, issues of public policy, as well as public affairs issues are welcome. The journal also publishes relevant literature reviews, research notes and summary reports of innovative research projects in criminal justice. Qualitative and quantifiable articles are sought mainly from academics and researchers in the field, though articles from professionals will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Research note: examining the connection of organizational citizenship behaviors with supervisor and management trust among correctional staff Courtroom decorum and the rules of conduct: accounts of homicide co-victims’ experiences during criminal justice proceedings Research note: jail staff views of inmate medical care and fear of being at risk Students’ perceptions of school resource officer performance An interdisciplinary researcher-practitioner partnership: lessons and perspectives from researchers and problem-solving court personnel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1