Importance-related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2021-08-13 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12198
Jerzy Wojciechowski, Gáspár Lukács
{"title":"Importance-related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario","authors":"Jerzy Wojciechowski,&nbsp;Gáspár Lukács","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The Response Time Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) can reveal when a person recognizes a relevant item among other irrelevant items, based on comparatively slower responses. Therefore, if a person is concealing knowledge about the relevance of this item (e.g., recognizing it as a murder weapon), this deception can be revealed. A recent study introduced additional ‘familiarity-related fillers’, and these items substantially enhanced diagnostic efficiency in detecting autobiographical data. However, the generalizability of the efficiency of fillers to other scenarios remains an open question. We empirically investigated whether new importance-related fillers enhanced diagnostic efficiency in an imaginary crime scenario.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and thirty-nine volunteers participated in an independent samples experiment. Participants were asked to imagine either committing a crime (‘guilty’ group) or to imagine visiting a museum (‘innocent’ group). Then, all participants underwent RT-CIT testing using either a standard single probe or an enhanced single probe (with importance-related fillers) protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The enhanced RT-CIT (with importance-related fillers) showed high diagnostic efficiency (AUC = .810), and significantly outperformed the standard version (AUC = .562). Neither dropout rates nor exclusion criteria influenced this enhancement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Importance-related fillers improve diagnostic efficiency when detecting episodic information using the RT-CIT and seem to be useful in detecting knowledge in a wide range of scenarios.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12198","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

The Response Time Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) can reveal when a person recognizes a relevant item among other irrelevant items, based on comparatively slower responses. Therefore, if a person is concealing knowledge about the relevance of this item (e.g., recognizing it as a murder weapon), this deception can be revealed. A recent study introduced additional ‘familiarity-related fillers’, and these items substantially enhanced diagnostic efficiency in detecting autobiographical data. However, the generalizability of the efficiency of fillers to other scenarios remains an open question. We empirically investigated whether new importance-related fillers enhanced diagnostic efficiency in an imaginary crime scenario.

Methods

Two hundred and thirty-nine volunteers participated in an independent samples experiment. Participants were asked to imagine either committing a crime (‘guilty’ group) or to imagine visiting a museum (‘innocent’ group). Then, all participants underwent RT-CIT testing using either a standard single probe or an enhanced single probe (with importance-related fillers) protocol.

Results

The enhanced RT-CIT (with importance-related fillers) showed high diagnostic efficiency (AUC = .810), and significantly outperformed the standard version (AUC = .562). Neither dropout rates nor exclusion criteria influenced this enhancement.

Conclusions

Importance-related fillers improve diagnostic efficiency when detecting episodic information using the RT-CIT and seem to be useful in detecting knowledge in a wide range of scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重要性相关的填充物提高了犯罪场景中反应时间隐藏信息测试的分类准确性
目的。反应时间隐藏信息测试(RT-CIT)可以根据相对较慢的反应,揭示一个人何时在其他不相关的项目中识别出相关的项目。因此,如果一个人隐瞒了关于这个物品相关性的知识(例如,承认它是一件谋杀武器),这种欺骗就会被揭露。最近的一项研究引入了额外的“熟悉度相关填充物”,这些填充物大大提高了检测自传体数据的诊断效率。然而,填充物的效率在其他情况下的普遍性仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。我们实证研究了在一个虚构的犯罪场景中,新的与重要性相关的填充物是否提高了诊断效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
期刊最新文献
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents Effect of growth trajectories in communication skills on juvenile recidivism Issue Information Attitudes towards the penal system, ideology and dark traits Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1