FOREIGN POLICY OF THE SOUTH CAUCASIAN COUNTRIES: RESULTS AND NEW CHALLENGES

Q3 Social Sciences Central Asia and the Caucasus Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.37178/ca-c.21.4.06
L. Aleksanyan
{"title":"FOREIGN POLICY OF THE SOUTH CAUCASIAN COUNTRIES: RESULTS AND NEW CHALLENGES","authors":"L. Aleksanyan","doi":"10.37178/ca-c.21.4.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The newly independent states (South Caucasian countries being no exception), the products of the Soviet Union’s traumatic disintegration, needed independent foreign policies. Throughout the three decades of their independence they formulated their priorities and defined approaches and principles under strong pressure of certain factors. This process has been unfolding amid the complicated social and political processes and geopolitical transformations in the region shaken by the post-Soviet ethnic conflicts. As could be expected, the newly independent South Caucasian states opted for different routes in their economic and statehood development, while their ruling elites took into account the external and internal contexts when shaping their foreign policies. Different approaches and different foreign policy priorities opened the doors to non-regional geopolitical actors: the United States, the European Union, Iran and Turkey have joined Russia, whose presence is rooted in its past. Recently, China, Israel and Japan have become interested in the region. Thus, today the regional countries are orientated to the interests of non-regional states. This has not benefited the situation in the region or cooperation among the regional states. Foreign policy of the South Caucasian countries is inseparable from the regional security problems, which means that it should become an object of meticulous studies. In the latter half of 2020, the war in Nagorno-Karabakh changed the region’s geopolitical setting and shattered its stability. The article sums up the results of the policies pursued by the South Caucasian countries and identifies the challenges and possible developments in the region after the Karabakh war of 2020.","PeriodicalId":53489,"journal":{"name":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37178/ca-c.21.4.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The newly independent states (South Caucasian countries being no exception), the products of the Soviet Union’s traumatic disintegration, needed independent foreign policies. Throughout the three decades of their independence they formulated their priorities and defined approaches and principles under strong pressure of certain factors. This process has been unfolding amid the complicated social and political processes and geopolitical transformations in the region shaken by the post-Soviet ethnic conflicts. As could be expected, the newly independent South Caucasian states opted for different routes in their economic and statehood development, while their ruling elites took into account the external and internal contexts when shaping their foreign policies. Different approaches and different foreign policy priorities opened the doors to non-regional geopolitical actors: the United States, the European Union, Iran and Turkey have joined Russia, whose presence is rooted in its past. Recently, China, Israel and Japan have become interested in the region. Thus, today the regional countries are orientated to the interests of non-regional states. This has not benefited the situation in the region or cooperation among the regional states. Foreign policy of the South Caucasian countries is inseparable from the regional security problems, which means that it should become an object of meticulous studies. In the latter half of 2020, the war in Nagorno-Karabakh changed the region’s geopolitical setting and shattered its stability. The article sums up the results of the policies pursued by the South Caucasian countries and identifies the challenges and possible developments in the region after the Karabakh war of 2020.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南高加索国家的外交政策:结果与新挑战
新独立的国家(南高加索人国家也不例外)是苏联创伤性解体的产物,需要独立的外交政策。在他们独立的三十年里,他们在某些因素的强大压力下制定了自己的优先事项,并确定了方法和原则。这一进程是在该地区因后苏联种族冲突而动荡的复杂社会和政治进程以及地缘政治变革中展开的。不出所料,新独立的南高加索人国家在经济和国家发展方面选择了不同的路线,而他们的统治精英在制定外交政策时考虑到了外部和内部环境。不同的方法和不同的外交政策优先事项为非地区地缘政治行为者打开了大门:美国、欧盟、伊朗和土耳其加入了俄罗斯,俄罗斯的存在植根于其过去。最近,中国、以色列和日本对该地区产生了兴趣。因此,今天,区域国家以非区域国家的利益为导向。这对该地区的局势或该地区国家之间的合作都没有好处。南高加索国家的外交政策与地区安全问题密不可分,这意味着它应该成为一个细致研究的对象。2020年下半年,纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫战争改变了该地区的地缘政治环境,破坏了其稳定。文章总结了南高加索人国家推行政策的结果,并确定了2020年卡拉巴赫战争后该地区面临的挑战和可能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central Asia and the Caucasus
Central Asia and the Caucasus Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Pakistan's Trade Opportunities and Challenges with CARs: Metaphor Used by the US as a Lethal Weapon of Mass Destruction against the Other for Pursuing Ulterior Motives Prohibition on Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan: Geo-Politics of Afghanistan under Taliban Regime: Pakistan and Central Asian Republics: Cooperation and Opportunities -Trade and Energy corridors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1