Sinus Floor Elevation and Antrostomy Healing: A Histomorphometric Clinical Study in Humans.

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry Implant Dentistry Pub Date : 2019-08-14 DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000932
Kazushige Tanaka, G. Iezzi, A. Piattelli, Mauro Ferri, N. F. Mesa, K. A. Apaza Alccayhuaman, D. Botticelli
{"title":"Sinus Floor Elevation and Antrostomy Healing: A Histomorphometric Clinical Study in Humans.","authors":"Kazushige Tanaka, G. Iezzi, A. Piattelli, Mauro Ferri, N. F. Mesa, K. A. Apaza Alccayhuaman, D. Botticelli","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo compare the histomorphometric outcomes of biopsies collected from the antrostomy and from the alveolar crest of the maxillary sinus after a sinus-lift procedure.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nIn 12 volunteers, sinus floor elevation was performed using collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone. Nine months after the surgery, 2 biopsies, 1 from the alveolar crest and 1 from the antrostomy, were collected for histological analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBiopsies from 11 patients were available for histological analyses (n = 11). At the alveolar crest sites, the percentage of mineralized bone was 40.1 ± 14.1%, of bone marrow was 40.1 ± 18.0%, and of the xenograft was 14.7 ± 15.2%. Small amounts of soft tissue were found. At the antrostomy sites, the percentages of mineralized bone, bone marrow, and xenograft were 26.0 ± 10.8%, 23.4 ± 17.0%, and 28.2 ± 15.7%, respectively. Soft tissue was represented by 19.7 ± 19.4%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nHigher amounts of mineralized bone and bone marrow were found in the alveolar crest compared with the antrostomy.","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000932","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To compare the histomorphometric outcomes of biopsies collected from the antrostomy and from the alveolar crest of the maxillary sinus after a sinus-lift procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 12 volunteers, sinus floor elevation was performed using collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone. Nine months after the surgery, 2 biopsies, 1 from the alveolar crest and 1 from the antrostomy, were collected for histological analysis. RESULTS Biopsies from 11 patients were available for histological analyses (n = 11). At the alveolar crest sites, the percentage of mineralized bone was 40.1 ± 14.1%, of bone marrow was 40.1 ± 18.0%, and of the xenograft was 14.7 ± 15.2%. Small amounts of soft tissue were found. At the antrostomy sites, the percentages of mineralized bone, bone marrow, and xenograft were 26.0 ± 10.8%, 23.4 ± 17.0%, and 28.2 ± 15.7%, respectively. Soft tissue was represented by 19.7 ± 19.4%. CONCLUSION Higher amounts of mineralized bone and bone marrow were found in the alveolar crest compared with the antrostomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窦底抬高和Anthromy愈合:一项人类组织形态计量学临床研究。
目的比较上颌窦窦窦造瘘术后和上颌窦牙槽嵴活检的组织形态计量学结果。材料和方法在12名志愿者中,使用胶原皮质松质猪骨进行窦底抬高。术后9个月,收集2例活检,1例来自牙槽嵴,1例取自胃窦造口术,用于组织学分析。结果11例患者的眼压可用于组织学分析(n=11)。在牙槽嵴部位,矿化骨的百分比为40.1±14.1%,骨髓的百分比为4.01±18.0%,异种移植物的百分比为14.7±15.2%。在窦造口术部位,矿化骨、骨髓和异种移植物的百分比分别为26.0±10.8%、23.4±17.0%和28.2±15.7%。软组织占19.7±19.4%。结论与胃窦造瘘术相比,牙槽嵴内矿化骨和骨髓含量较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Council Clinical Implications of Functional Mitral Regurgitation Severity in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Implant. Comparison Between a Computer-Aided Surgical Template and the Free-Hand Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Long-Term Outcomes of Tooth-Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Periodontally Compromised and Treated Patients Refusing Bone Grafting Surgical Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1