{"title":"Guest editorial: Contextualising leadership – the impact of strategy and culture in healthcare and disability services","authors":"David Rosenbaum, E. More, M. Orr","doi":"10.1108/lhs-02-2023-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More contemporary approaches, as Schedlitzki and Edwards (2021) outline, encompass concerns with context, followership, power and politics, a wider distribution of leaders, culture, communication, learning, gender and diversity, ethics and even the Phoenix leaders managing change in contemporary firestorm disruption (Woodward et al., 2021). The flip side of this is what Hofmann and Vermunt (2020, p. 252) claim is the need \"to develop a conceptually sound outcome model for clinical leadership (CL) development in healthcare, linking individual professional learning and organisational change.” Yet, context is crucial in consideration of aspects of leadership in health services. [...]for us, the interconnectedness of healthcare and the disability sector is an ever-growing consideration and challenge, especially with the introduction and implementation of the National Disability Insurance Scheme in Australia and the recent Australian Royal Commission into the Disability sector. Leaders were required to develop innovative responses to service delivery (including face-to-face and digital responses), redirect and re-train workforces, develop new clinical and social supports, and manage the safe return to work to those who fell ill (Phillips et al., 2022;Whelehan et al., 2021).","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-02-2023-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
More contemporary approaches, as Schedlitzki and Edwards (2021) outline, encompass concerns with context, followership, power and politics, a wider distribution of leaders, culture, communication, learning, gender and diversity, ethics and even the Phoenix leaders managing change in contemporary firestorm disruption (Woodward et al., 2021). The flip side of this is what Hofmann and Vermunt (2020, p. 252) claim is the need "to develop a conceptually sound outcome model for clinical leadership (CL) development in healthcare, linking individual professional learning and organisational change.” Yet, context is crucial in consideration of aspects of leadership in health services. [...]for us, the interconnectedness of healthcare and the disability sector is an ever-growing consideration and challenge, especially with the introduction and implementation of the National Disability Insurance Scheme in Australia and the recent Australian Royal Commission into the Disability sector. Leaders were required to develop innovative responses to service delivery (including face-to-face and digital responses), redirect and re-train workforces, develop new clinical and social supports, and manage the safe return to work to those who fell ill (Phillips et al., 2022;Whelehan et al., 2021).
更现代的方法,正如Schedlitzki和Edwards(2021)概述的那样,涵盖了对背景、追随者、权力和政治、更广泛的领导者分布、文化、沟通、学习、性别和多样性、道德的关注,甚至凤凰城领导人在当代火灾风暴破坏中管理变革(Woodward et al., 2021)。另一方面,霍夫曼和佛蒙特(2020年,第252页)声称,需要“为医疗保健领域的临床领导力(CL)发展开发一个概念上合理的结果模型,将个人专业学习与组织变革联系起来。”然而,在考虑卫生服务领导的各个方面时,背景是至关重要的。[…对我们来说,医疗保健和残疾部门的相互联系是一个日益增长的考虑和挑战,特别是在澳大利亚引入和实施国家残疾保险计划以及最近澳大利亚皇家委员会进入残疾部门之后。领导者需要开发创新的服务提供响应(包括面对面和数字响应),重新引导和重新培训劳动力,开发新的临床和社会支持,并管理那些生病的人安全重返工作岗位(Phillips等人,2022;Whelehan等人,2021)。