{"title":"Littératures populaires du droit. Le droit à la portée de tous","authors":"F. Rossi","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customs of War on Land’ (Hague, II). Eventually, Crossland’s study demonstrates how persistent and overlapping tensions in the law of armed conflict already influenced its formative period in the nineteenth century. The campaign to control war was oscillating between humanity and military necessity and between humanitarianism and professionalism. The movements were both international and inward-looking, as visions were inspired by internationalism and patriotism. At times, the regulation of war and arbitration also appeared to be competing instruments. Perhaps most fundamentally, any effort to regulate war sooner or later had to justify why war was not to be outlawed as such. It took the commitment, dedication and endurance of many individuals, and a significant number of setbacks had to be accepted before any rules to mitigate the destructive effect of war or to prevent war from being waged at all were laid down, reflecting no more than compromise.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"8 1","pages":"66 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757261","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Customs of War on Land’ (Hague, II). Eventually, Crossland’s study demonstrates how persistent and overlapping tensions in the law of armed conflict already influenced its formative period in the nineteenth century. The campaign to control war was oscillating between humanity and military necessity and between humanitarianism and professionalism. The movements were both international and inward-looking, as visions were inspired by internationalism and patriotism. At times, the regulation of war and arbitration also appeared to be competing instruments. Perhaps most fundamentally, any effort to regulate war sooner or later had to justify why war was not to be outlawed as such. It took the commitment, dedication and endurance of many individuals, and a significant number of setbacks had to be accepted before any rules to mitigate the destructive effect of war or to prevent war from being waged at all were laid down, reflecting no more than compromise.
期刊介绍:
Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.