Burst mode in a cooled packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge reactor for CO2 splitting

IF 1.3 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Plasma Research Express Pub Date : 2021-05-20 DOI:10.1088/2516-1067/ac0095
Jesse Santoso, Mingming Zhu, Dongke Zhang
{"title":"Burst mode in a cooled packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge reactor for CO2 splitting","authors":"Jesse Santoso, Mingming Zhu, Dongke Zhang","doi":"10.1088/2516-1067/ac0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so called ‘burst mode’, a rapidly pulsed power regime for dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs) has previously been reported to greatly improve the performance of an uncooled and unpacked DBD reactor for CO2 splitting. Here we explore the interaction between a DBD in burst mode and each of active cooling and a dielectric packing material (1.0–1.2 mm glass beads) in a coaxial, metal-dielectric DBD reactor for CO2 splitting. The effect of burst mode on CO2 conversion and energy efficiency under different combinations of cooling and packing were investigated and compared with those under continuous wave mode operation. The burst mode operation showed similar CO2 conversion and energy efficiency to continuous wave mode in the unpacked and uncooled configuration under the conditions investigated in this study. However, burst mode significantly outperformed continuous wave mode in the packed and uncooled configuration. When active cooling was employed, burst mode was found to provide only minor benefit or no benefit, depending on specific energy input (SEI), compared to continuous wave mode for each the packed and unpacked configurations. Maximum conversion and energy efficiency were achieved with both packing and active cooling across all SEI examined, and performance in this configuration was found to be relatively insensitive to the power delivery mode.","PeriodicalId":36295,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Research Express","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Research Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1067/ac0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The so called ‘burst mode’, a rapidly pulsed power regime for dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs) has previously been reported to greatly improve the performance of an uncooled and unpacked DBD reactor for CO2 splitting. Here we explore the interaction between a DBD in burst mode and each of active cooling and a dielectric packing material (1.0–1.2 mm glass beads) in a coaxial, metal-dielectric DBD reactor for CO2 splitting. The effect of burst mode on CO2 conversion and energy efficiency under different combinations of cooling and packing were investigated and compared with those under continuous wave mode operation. The burst mode operation showed similar CO2 conversion and energy efficiency to continuous wave mode in the unpacked and uncooled configuration under the conditions investigated in this study. However, burst mode significantly outperformed continuous wave mode in the packed and uncooled configuration. When active cooling was employed, burst mode was found to provide only minor benefit or no benefit, depending on specific energy input (SEI), compared to continuous wave mode for each the packed and unpacked configurations. Maximum conversion and energy efficiency were achieved with both packing and active cooling across all SEI examined, and performance in this configuration was found to be relatively insensitive to the power delivery mode.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CO2裂解介质阻挡放电反应器的爆发模式
所谓的“爆发模式”是一种用于介质阻挡放电(DBDs)的快速脉冲功率模式,此前曾有报道称,它极大地提高了用于二氧化碳分裂的非冷却非填料DBD反应堆的性能。本文研究了在同轴金属-介电DBD反应器中,脉冲模式DBD与主动冷却和介电填料(1.0-1.2 mm玻璃微珠)之间的相互作用。研究了不同冷却和填料组合下突发模式对CO2转化率和能源效率的影响,并与连续波模式下的结果进行了比较。在本研究所研究的条件下,在无填料和非冷却配置下,突发模式操作显示出与连续波模式相似的CO2转化率和能源效率。然而,在填充和非冷却配置中,突发模式明显优于连续波模式。当采用主动冷却时,根据特定能量输入(SEI),与连续波模式相比,对于每种包装和未包装配置,爆发模式只提供很小的好处或没有好处。在所有SEI测试中,填料和主动冷却都实现了最大的转换和能源效率,并且发现这种配置的性能对功率传输模式相对不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plasma Research Express
Plasma Research Express Energy-Nuclear Energy and Engineering
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Study of cylindrical and spherical dust acoustic solitons and quasiperiodic structures in a quantum dusty plasma Activation of water in the downstream of low-pressure ammonia plasma discharge Hydroxyl radical dynamics in a gliding arc discharge using high-speed PLIF imaging 6D phase space collective modes in Vlasov-Maxwell system Two stream instabilities in unmagnetized nonrelativistic quantum plasma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1