Communication Matters: How Do Visitors Interact with Ethnographic Open-Air Museums?

Q3 Engineering Informacijos Mokslai Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.15388/IM.2018.83.9
N. Charapan
{"title":"Communication Matters: How Do Visitors Interact with Ethnographic Open-Air Museums?","authors":"N. Charapan","doi":"10.15388/IM.2018.83.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] \nThough the concept of an ethnographic open-air museum is not a new one, little is known about the interplay between a visitor and an amalgam museum setting. Ethnographic open-air museums are complex spaces with shared qualities of outdoor sites and indoor museums. Grounded in Gibson’s theory of affordances (1979), the article explores how visitors interact within and in relation to the hybrid space of ethnographic open-air museum and how communication shapes their interactions. The analysis is based on a qualitative study of visitors in the Belarusian State Museum of Folk Architecture and Rural Lifestyle (Aziartso, Belarus) and the Open-Air Museum of Lithuania (Rumšiškės, Lithuania). The data were collected using participatory observation and semistructured interviews with visitors. The article employs a constructivist approach and conceptualizes an ethnographic museum as a free-choice environment, where behavior patterns are linked to the institutional context and the visitors’ ability to perceive the information about the objects and environments that specified the possibilities and constraints for interacting with the museum’s space. The study reveals how cultural communication fosters the diversity of visiting scenarios and the perceptions of ethnographic open-air museums as cultural heritage sites, natural parks and stages for entertainment. The implications of this research could be relevant to cultural policymakers and communication specialists in designing the cultural, recreational and educational policies of museums.","PeriodicalId":37230,"journal":{"name":"Informacijos Mokslai","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacijos Mokslai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/IM.2018.83.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] Though the concept of an ethnographic open-air museum is not a new one, little is known about the interplay between a visitor and an amalgam museum setting. Ethnographic open-air museums are complex spaces with shared qualities of outdoor sites and indoor museums. Grounded in Gibson’s theory of affordances (1979), the article explores how visitors interact within and in relation to the hybrid space of ethnographic open-air museum and how communication shapes their interactions. The analysis is based on a qualitative study of visitors in the Belarusian State Museum of Folk Architecture and Rural Lifestyle (Aziartso, Belarus) and the Open-Air Museum of Lithuania (Rumšiškės, Lithuania). The data were collected using participatory observation and semistructured interviews with visitors. The article employs a constructivist approach and conceptualizes an ethnographic museum as a free-choice environment, where behavior patterns are linked to the institutional context and the visitors’ ability to perceive the information about the objects and environments that specified the possibilities and constraints for interacting with the museum’s space. The study reveals how cultural communication fosters the diversity of visiting scenarios and the perceptions of ethnographic open-air museums as cultural heritage sites, natural parks and stages for entertainment. The implications of this research could be relevant to cultural policymakers and communication specialists in designing the cultural, recreational and educational policies of museums.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通问题:游客如何与民族志露天博物馆互动?
[全文,英文摘要;立陶宛文摘要]尽管民族志露天博物馆的概念并不新鲜,但人们对游客和混合博物馆环境之间的相互作用知之甚少。民族志露天博物馆是一个复杂的空间,具有室外场所和室内博物馆的共同品质。本文以吉布森的可供性理论(1979年)为基础,探讨了游客如何在民族志露天博物馆的混合空间内互动以及与之相关,以及交流如何塑造他们的互动。该分析基于对白俄罗斯国家民间建筑和乡村生活博物馆(白俄罗斯阿齐亚尔索)和立陶宛露天博物馆(立陶宛Rumšiškïs)游客的定性研究。数据是通过参与式观察和对来访者的半结构化访谈收集的。本文采用建构主义方法,将人种学博物馆概念化为一个自由选择的环境,在这里,行为模式与制度背景和游客感知物体和环境信息的能力有关,这些信息规定了与博物馆空间互动的可能性和限制。这项研究揭示了文化交流如何促进参观场景的多样性,以及民族志露天博物馆作为文化遗产地、自然公园和娱乐舞台的看法。这项研究的意义可能与文化政策制定者和传播专家设计博物馆的文化、娱乐和教育政策有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informacijos Mokslai
Informacijos Mokslai Engineering-Media Technology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Participatory Heritage On Social Networking Sites: The Discussion of Main Theoretical Concepts For Peculiarities of Representation of Women's Roles and Their Changes in Women's Magazines: Case of the Magazine Moteris The Comparative Analysis of Sexual Violence and Harassment at the piloting Universities of Cyprus and Lithuania Transformation of Communist Media Content and Public Space According to the Discourse ‘39Pact: Exiting the “Labyrinth” as an Act of Communication Communication Strategies Used in Teaching Media Information Literacy for Combating Hoaxes in Indonesia: A Case Study of Indonesian National Movements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1