Contemporary British satire and the problem of Jonathan Swift’s personae

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ars & Humanitas Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI:10.4312/ars.14.1.27-40
J. Stubbs
{"title":"Contemporary British satire and the problem of Jonathan Swift’s personae","authors":"J. Stubbs","doi":"10.4312/ars.14.1.27-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay brings the example of Jonathan Swift’s literary personae to bear on current trends in satirical culture. A number of recent commentators have written of a crisis in contemporary British satire. They invoke Horkheimer and Adorno’s theory that comedy supports power interests which it purportedly undermines. The present essay maintains that Swift in a sense confirms this theory, but also that he sets another, more exacting standard for satire. Swiftian satire is singular if not unique in that it is openly self-disabling: in its highest form it deploys a persona that exhausts the resources of contemporary and classical theory. In doing so, it confronts its audiences with a complex and engaged expression of political helplessness. But it also uses irony to tell the truth. The standard Swift sets contemporary satire is an exacting one: to deliver an unflinching and, if necessary, vindictive testimony against injustice.","PeriodicalId":40773,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars & Humanitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.14.1.27-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay brings the example of Jonathan Swift’s literary personae to bear on current trends in satirical culture. A number of recent commentators have written of a crisis in contemporary British satire. They invoke Horkheimer and Adorno’s theory that comedy supports power interests which it purportedly undermines. The present essay maintains that Swift in a sense confirms this theory, but also that he sets another, more exacting standard for satire. Swiftian satire is singular if not unique in that it is openly self-disabling: in its highest form it deploys a persona that exhausts the resources of contemporary and classical theory. In doing so, it confronts its audiences with a complex and engaged expression of political helplessness. But it also uses irony to tell the truth. The standard Swift sets contemporary satire is an exacting one: to deliver an unflinching and, if necessary, vindictive testimony against injustice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代英国讽刺文学与乔纳森·斯威夫特的人物形象问题
本文以乔纳森·斯威夫特的文学人物形象为例,分析了当代讽刺文化的发展趋势。最近,一些评论家撰文指出了当代英国讽刺文学的危机。他们援引了霍克海默和阿多诺的理论,即喜剧支持权力利益,而它据称会破坏权力利益。本文认为,斯威夫特在某种意义上证实了这一理论,但他也为讽刺作品设定了另一种更严格的标准。斯威夫特的讽刺作品即使不是独一无二的,也是独一无二的,因为它公开地自我致残:在其最高形式中,它展现了一种耗尽当代和古典理论资源的人格。在这样做的过程中,它向观众展示了一种复杂而投入的政治无助感。但它也用讽刺来讲述真相。斯威夫特为当代讽刺作品设定的标准是严格的:对不公正做出毫不退缩的、必要时带有报复性的证词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ars & Humanitas
Ars & Humanitas HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contactos e intercambios entre las literaturas de Europa Central y del Sureste y de América Latina durante la Guerra Fría Eslovenia y la Guerra Fría cultural The importance of separating the author from the narrative in modern and classical literature Zagovornik literarne izobrazbe pisateljev in kritikov Alkoholizem v delih slovenskih in čeških pisateljic dolgega 19. stoletja
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1