Bilateral collaboration between the Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat) and United States Research Communities – from a vision to everyday practice

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Polar Record Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1017/S0032247422000298
J. Mercer, J. Nymand, L. Culler, Rebecca Lynge, Sten Lund, Bo Gregersen, Brett Makens, R. Virginia, Kristian G. Moore
{"title":"Bilateral collaboration between the Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat) and United States Research Communities – from a vision to everyday practice","authors":"J. Mercer, J. Nymand, L. Culler, Rebecca Lynge, Sten Lund, Bo Gregersen, Brett Makens, R. Virginia, Kristian G. Moore","doi":"10.1017/S0032247422000298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Each year, hundreds of international researchers enter Greenland to conduct scientific fieldwork. Historically, they have had little interaction with local communities and scientists at Greenland research institutes. Recognising that collaboration between Greenland and the United States can yield better research, consider more diverse perspectives, articulate the benefits of research to Greenland society, and train the next generation in a collaborative framework, representatives from both countries have been engaged in a series of events to cultivate bilateral relationships. Here, we describe the process of these events (workshops, conference sessions, and public dialogues), the findings, and the outcomes that have followed. Prior to this focused engagement, United States and Greenland scientists typically pursued their research independently. Since the engagement, more researchers from both countries have successfully partnered to obtain funding for collaborative research. Furthermore, development of a bilateral collaboration network is underway. The focused approach on bilateral engagement also proved essential for maintaining research and other activities during the global pandemic. When United States researchers were prevented from entering Greenland, their Greenland partners were able to continue the fieldwork, ensuring that progress was not lost. Future international projects can build on these successes to expand collaborative and interdisciplinary research in Greenland.","PeriodicalId":49685,"journal":{"name":"Polar Record","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Record","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Each year, hundreds of international researchers enter Greenland to conduct scientific fieldwork. Historically, they have had little interaction with local communities and scientists at Greenland research institutes. Recognising that collaboration between Greenland and the United States can yield better research, consider more diverse perspectives, articulate the benefits of research to Greenland society, and train the next generation in a collaborative framework, representatives from both countries have been engaged in a series of events to cultivate bilateral relationships. Here, we describe the process of these events (workshops, conference sessions, and public dialogues), the findings, and the outcomes that have followed. Prior to this focused engagement, United States and Greenland scientists typically pursued their research independently. Since the engagement, more researchers from both countries have successfully partnered to obtain funding for collaborative research. Furthermore, development of a bilateral collaboration network is underway. The focused approach on bilateral engagement also proved essential for maintaining research and other activities during the global pandemic. When United States researchers were prevented from entering Greenland, their Greenland partners were able to continue the fieldwork, ensuring that progress was not lost. Future international projects can build on these successes to expand collaborative and interdisciplinary research in Greenland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格陵兰(Kalaallit Nunaat)和美国研究界之间的双边合作——从愿景到日常实践
摘要每年都有数百名国际研究人员进入格陵兰岛进行科学实地考察。从历史上看,他们与当地社区和格陵兰研究所的科学家几乎没有互动。认识到格陵兰岛和美国之间的合作可以产生更好的研究,考虑更多样的视角,阐明研究对格陵兰社会的好处,并在合作框架内培训下一代,两国代表参与了一系列活动,以培养双边关系。在这里,我们描述了这些活动的过程(研讨会、会议和公众对话)、调查结果以及随后的结果。在此之前,美国和格陵兰岛的科学家通常独立进行研究。自参与以来,两国越来越多的研究人员成功合作,为合作研究获得资金。此外,正在发展双边合作网络。事实证明,重点关注双边接触的方法对于在全球疫情期间保持研究和其他活动也至关重要。当美国研究人员被阻止进入格陵兰岛时,他们的格陵兰合作伙伴能够继续实地调查,确保不会失去进展。未来的国际项目可以在这些成功的基础上扩大格陵兰的合作和跨学科研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Record
Polar Record 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Polar Record is an international, peer-reviewed scholarly periodical publishing results from a wide range of polar research areas. The journal covers original primary research papers in the humanities, social sciences, physical sciences, life sciences, and polar technology, as well as papers concerning current political, economic, legal, and environmental issues in the Arctic or Antarctic. Polar Record endeavours to provide rapid publication, normally within nine months of initial submission.
期刊最新文献
British sailor or Inuk? A reappraisal of the ancestry of human skeletal remains found in 1949 by Henry Larsen, Cape Felix, King William Island Blubber for Bibles: translating colonialism in Inuit missions, c. 1750–1850 “A romance based on information”: The curious case of Clements Markham’s Franklin Expedition novel Discovery of some initial sketches and notes for William Scoresby Junior’s An Account of the Arctic Regions Scoping Arctic expertise: The mismatch between traditional theories of expertise and Indigenous expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1