When a financially oriented performance measurement system supports hybrid collective sensemaking: The case of a cooperative bank

IF 5.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE British Accounting Review Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2023.101202
{"title":"When a financially oriented performance measurement system supports hybrid collective sensemaking: The case of a cooperative bank","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A performance measurement system (PMS) is supported by the idea that performance measurements are drivers of organisational performance. Under that assumption, scholars have discussed and tried to develop comprehensive PMSs that include both financial and non-financial measurements. Building on the specific context of a hybrid organisation and findings from a </span>case study<span>, this paper explores how an incomplete and financially oriented PMS in a hybrid setting can nevertheless support collective sensemaking. The findings show how a PMS is used by managers at a cooperative bank as an artefact, supporting conversational and material practices. Combined with the organisation's strong socialisation process and managers and employees' need to defend their social and cooperative identity, a PMS supports the bank's hybrid nature and leads to the avoidance of tension and conflict. That shows that the PMS presents a specific feature: flexibility in its handling and use by managers and employees. This paper thus contributes to the call made in the literature for more studies on PMSs in hybrid organisations by showing that even an incomplete PMS can allow such organisations to avoid tension and conflict relating to their hybrid values.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838923000355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A performance measurement system (PMS) is supported by the idea that performance measurements are drivers of organisational performance. Under that assumption, scholars have discussed and tried to develop comprehensive PMSs that include both financial and non-financial measurements. Building on the specific context of a hybrid organisation and findings from a case study, this paper explores how an incomplete and financially oriented PMS in a hybrid setting can nevertheless support collective sensemaking. The findings show how a PMS is used by managers at a cooperative bank as an artefact, supporting conversational and material practices. Combined with the organisation's strong socialisation process and managers and employees' need to defend their social and cooperative identity, a PMS supports the bank's hybrid nature and leads to the avoidance of tension and conflict. That shows that the PMS presents a specific feature: flexibility in its handling and use by managers and employees. This paper thus contributes to the call made in the literature for more studies on PMSs in hybrid organisations by showing that even an incomplete PMS can allow such organisations to avoid tension and conflict relating to their hybrid values.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当以财务为导向的绩效衡量系统支持混合集体意义构建时:以合作银行为例
绩效衡量系统(PMS)的支持理念是:绩效衡量是组织绩效的驱动力。在这一假设下,学者们讨论并尝试开发包括财务和非财务测量在内的综合绩效管理系统。本文以一个混合型组织的具体情况和案例研究结果为基础,探讨了在混合型环境中,不完整的、以财务为导向的绩效管理系统如何能够支持集体意识的形成。研究结果表明,一家合作银行的管理人员是如何将 PMS 作为一种人工制品来使用的,从而支持对话和物质实践。与该组织强大的社会化进程以及管理人员和员工捍卫其社会和合作身份的需要相结合,项目管理系统支持了银行的混合性质,并避免了紧张和冲突。这表明,项目管理系统具有一个特殊的特点:管理人员和员工在处理和使用该系统时具有灵活性。因此,本文表明,即使是不完整的项目管理系统也能使混合型组织避免与其混合价值观有关的紧张和冲突,从而为文献中关于对混合型组织中的项目管理系统进行更多研究的呼吁做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Deposit insurance and credit union earnings opacity Online judicial auction, loan availability, and corporate investment in China Editorial Board When a financially oriented performance measurement system supports hybrid collective sensemaking: The case of a cooperative bank Hybridisation, purification, and re-hybridisation: A study of shifting registers of value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1