ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCE AND APPLICATION IN BRAZILIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION

IF 0.2 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geoambiente On-line Pub Date : 2020-11-18 DOI:10.5216/revgeoamb.i38.64975
S. Folharini, R. C. de Oliveira
{"title":"ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCE AND APPLICATION IN BRAZILIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION","authors":"S. Folharini, R. C. de Oliveira","doi":"10.5216/revgeoamb.i38.64975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of Ecosystem Services proposed in the 1970s gained wider discussion in the 1990s, mainly due to the increased engagement of member countries of the United Nations in building policies for sustainable dksevelopment that consider human needs and the preservation of natural resources, drawing to this end on efforts from various fields of science. Different sectors of academia, such as biology and geography, contributed to this interdisciplinary discussion with studies in the environmental area and other fields of science that do not effectively work with concepts like ecosystem and environment, and sometimes use these concepts incorrectly in their works to explain a given phenomenon. In order to contribute to the interdisciplinary discussion related to Ecosystem Services and Environmental Services, this article proposes a review of the concepts of ecosystem and environment, including the Payment for Services model, whether environmental or ecosystem, and of Brazilian federal legislation on the subject, contributing to the discussion on how these terms can be used in a more feasible way to address phenomena studied in different kinds of research.","PeriodicalId":41234,"journal":{"name":"Geoambiente On-line","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoambiente On-line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/revgeoamb.i38.64975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The concept of Ecosystem Services proposed in the 1970s gained wider discussion in the 1990s, mainly due to the increased engagement of member countries of the United Nations in building policies for sustainable dksevelopment that consider human needs and the preservation of natural resources, drawing to this end on efforts from various fields of science. Different sectors of academia, such as biology and geography, contributed to this interdisciplinary discussion with studies in the environmental area and other fields of science that do not effectively work with concepts like ecosystem and environment, and sometimes use these concepts incorrectly in their works to explain a given phenomenon. In order to contribute to the interdisciplinary discussion related to Ecosystem Services and Environmental Services, this article proposes a review of the concepts of ecosystem and environment, including the Payment for Services model, whether environmental or ecosystem, and of Brazilian federal legislation on the subject, contributing to the discussion on how these terms can be used in a more feasible way to address phenomena studied in different kinds of research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境服务和生态系统服务:概念差异及其在巴西环境立法中的应用
20世纪70年代提出的生态系统服务概念在20世纪90年代得到了更广泛的讨论,这主要是因为联合国成员国越来越多地参与制定可持续发展政策,考虑到人类需求和保护自然资源,并为此目的借鉴了各科学领域的努力。生物学和地理学等学术界的不同部门参与了这一跨学科讨论,环境领域和其他科学领域的研究没有有效地处理生态系统和环境等概念,有时在他们的工作中错误地使用这些概念来解释特定现象。为了促进与生态系统服务和环境服务相关的跨学科讨论,本文建议审查生态系统和环境的概念,包括服务付费模式,无论是环境还是生态系统,以及巴西关于这一主题的联邦立法,有助于讨论如何以更可行的方式使用这些术语来解决不同类型研究中研究的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoambiente On-line
Geoambiente On-line GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SANEAMENTO BÁSICO EM TEMPOS DE PANDEMIA DE COVID-19 NO BRASIL O FLUXO DE VEÍCULOS NA RODOVIA BR 163/364 DE 2016 A 2018: UM ENSAIO DE RITMANÁLISE USO DE PLUVIÔMETRO ARTESANAL COMO INSTRUMENTO APLICADO À MODELAGEM DE CHEIA EM BELÉM-PA ESTIMATIVA DA PERDA DE SOLO NO MUNICÍPIO DE GOIÂNIA ENTRE OS ANOS DE 1998 E 2018, UTILIZANDO-SE DADOS DA LITERATURA CIENTÍFICA E DO PROJETO RADAM ESTOQUES DE CARBONO E BIOMASSA NO SEMIÁRIDO BAIANO (1973 A 2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1