Validation and Uncertainty Calculation of Rodenticide Analysis Methods in a Simulated Gastric Content Matrix – Uncertainty of Rodenticide Analysis Methods

IF 1.1 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.tn-22-2023
Flávio Bezerra, Y. Sade, Jailton Damasceno, Renata Silva
{"title":"Validation and Uncertainty Calculation of Rodenticide Analysis Methods in a Simulated Gastric Content Matrix – Uncertainty of Rodenticide Analysis Methods","authors":"Flávio Bezerra, Y. Sade, Jailton Damasceno, Renata Silva","doi":"10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.tn-22-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Warfarin (WAR), brodifacoum (BDF) and bromadiolone (BDL) are compounds present in rodenticides, highly toxic to rats, humans and other animals. These compounds can be detected in complex matrices, such as stomach contents, by liquid chromatography techniques (HPLC) with mass spectrometry (MS) or fluorescence detection (FLD). However, no validated method showed determination of uncertainty in the quantification of these compounds. In this study, we compare the validation parameters of two analytical methods, HPLC FLD and ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC – MS), with uncertainty estimation for the three cited compounds. The results showed that UHPLC-MS outperformed HPLC FLD, however both methods were considered adequate for detection of WAR, BDF or BDL in samples of simulated human stomach contents, especially in cases of suspected contamination.","PeriodicalId":9115,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.tn-22-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Warfarin (WAR), brodifacoum (BDF) and bromadiolone (BDL) are compounds present in rodenticides, highly toxic to rats, humans and other animals. These compounds can be detected in complex matrices, such as stomach contents, by liquid chromatography techniques (HPLC) with mass spectrometry (MS) or fluorescence detection (FLD). However, no validated method showed determination of uncertainty in the quantification of these compounds. In this study, we compare the validation parameters of two analytical methods, HPLC FLD and ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC – MS), with uncertainty estimation for the three cited compounds. The results showed that UHPLC-MS outperformed HPLC FLD, however both methods were considered adequate for detection of WAR, BDF or BDL in samples of simulated human stomach contents, especially in cases of suspected contamination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟胃内容物矩阵中杀鼠剂分析方法的验证和不确定度计算-杀鼠剂分析方法的不确定度
华法林(WAR)、溴二氟康(BDF)和溴敌隆(BDL)是存在于灭鼠剂中的化合物,对大鼠、人类和其他动物具有高度毒性。这些化合物可以通过液相色谱技术(HPLC)和质谱法(MS)或荧光检测法(FLD)在复杂基质中检测,如胃内容物。然而,没有经过验证的方法显示这些化合物定量的不确定度。在本研究中,我们比较了两种分析方法,HPLC FLD和超高效液相色谱法(UHPLC–MS)的验证参数,并对引用的三种化合物进行了不确定度估计。结果表明,UHPLC-MS优于HPLC-FLD,但这两种方法都被认为足以检测模拟人体胃内容物样本中的WAR、BDF或BDL,尤其是在疑似污染的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: BrJAC is dedicated to the diffusion of significant and original knowledge in all branches of Analytical Chemistry, and is addressed to professionals involved in science, technology and innovation projects at universities, research centers and in industry.
期刊最新文献
Degradation of the Micropollutant Amoxicillin using Enzymatic Treatment and Evaluation of Resulting Byproducts Importance of Elemental Chemical Speciation Studies in Enriched Food: Nutritional Quality, Toxicity, and Economic Improvement BrJAC 2023 – Growing and Building Bridges Assessment of Banknotes as a Matrix for Detecting Post-Explosion Residues of Fuel-Oxidizer Explosive Mixtures Using Ion Chromatography Development of an Air-assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Method as a Valuable Biomonitoring Tool for Exposure Assessment of Phthalates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1