Is Google Classroom, Zoom, and WhatsApp effective for accounting students during the COVID-19 pandemic?

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education for Business Pub Date : 2022-01-13 DOI:10.1080/08832323.2021.2023853
Chalarce Totanan
{"title":"Is Google Classroom, Zoom, and WhatsApp effective for accounting students during the COVID-19 pandemic?","authors":"Chalarce Totanan","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2021.2023853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to explain the level of accounting understanding in the learning process based on the technology. Population, there were 453 accounting students. The results: the level of understanding for assets was 85.5% and equity 86.8%, which is very understandable. For liabilities, it was only 66.1%, less understanding. Through statistical testing, the accounting learning system using Google Classroom provides a level of understanding of 0.437, using Zoom is 1.334, and the use of WhatsApp is −0.158, which has a negative effect. Zoom is superior because lecturers and students can interact as they would in an offline classroom setting. This research can be generalized to different courses.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"97 1","pages":"555 - 561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.2023853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to explain the level of accounting understanding in the learning process based on the technology. Population, there were 453 accounting students. The results: the level of understanding for assets was 85.5% and equity 86.8%, which is very understandable. For liabilities, it was only 66.1%, less understanding. Through statistical testing, the accounting learning system using Google Classroom provides a level of understanding of 0.437, using Zoom is 1.334, and the use of WhatsApp is −0.158, which has a negative effect. Zoom is superior because lecturers and students can interact as they would in an offline classroom setting. This research can be generalized to different courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新冠肺炎大流行期间,谷歌课堂、Zoom和WhatsApp对会计学生有效吗?
摘要本研究的目的是解释在基于技术的学习过程中对会计的理解水平。人口中,有453名会计专业学生。结果显示:对资产的理解水平为85.5%,对权益的理解程度为86.8%,这是可以理解的。就负债而言,这一比例仅为66.1%,低于理解水平。通过统计测试,使用谷歌课堂的会计学习系统提供了0.437的理解水平,使用Zoom为1.334,使用WhatsApp为−0.158,这具有负面影响。Zoom非常出色,因为讲师和学生可以像在离线课堂环境中一样进行互动。这项研究可以推广到不同的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Business
Journal of Education for Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of student evaluations: Exploring the effects of course modality and type in graduate business courses Embedded SDGs in undergraduate business sustainability programs curricula We have talent: Mock group interviewing improves employer perceived competence on hireability Unveiling student intention towards entrepreneurship development—a bibliometric investigation Measuring the impact of faculty development programmes on business schools’ performance in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1