When International Trade Law Meets Tax Policy: The Example of Digital Services Taxes

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2021038
A. Pirlot, Henri Culot
{"title":"When International Trade Law Meets Tax Policy: The Example of Digital Services Taxes","authors":"A. Pirlot, Henri Culot","doi":"10.54648/trad2021038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rise of digital services taxes (DSTs) all over the world, questions have arisen regarding their compatibility with international trade law. Between 2019 and 2021, the United States initiated investigations into several DSTs and published observations on the DSTs adopted by Austria, France, Italy, India, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom. In addition to the argument that these taxes violate international tax principles, the US considers that they are discriminatory. This article uses this claim as a basis to analyse the likelihood for DSTs to be incompatible with World Trade Organization (WTO) law. First, it provides an overview of the unilateral, regional and multilateral tax proposals to mitigate the challenges of the digitalized economy. Second, it discusses the main legal issues that could arise under the law of the WTO, focusing on legal issues under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). While recognising that there may be good tax policy reasons to oppose DSTs, this article concludes that arguments based on WTO law provide, if at all, a weak justification to oppose such taxes.\nDigital Service Taxes (DST), GATS, Unilateral taxes, Digitalized economy, Destinationbased taxes, National treatment, Most-favoured-nation principle, Non-discrimination of services and service providers","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the rise of digital services taxes (DSTs) all over the world, questions have arisen regarding their compatibility with international trade law. Between 2019 and 2021, the United States initiated investigations into several DSTs and published observations on the DSTs adopted by Austria, France, Italy, India, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom. In addition to the argument that these taxes violate international tax principles, the US considers that they are discriminatory. This article uses this claim as a basis to analyse the likelihood for DSTs to be incompatible with World Trade Organization (WTO) law. First, it provides an overview of the unilateral, regional and multilateral tax proposals to mitigate the challenges of the digitalized economy. Second, it discusses the main legal issues that could arise under the law of the WTO, focusing on legal issues under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). While recognising that there may be good tax policy reasons to oppose DSTs, this article concludes that arguments based on WTO law provide, if at all, a weak justification to oppose such taxes. Digital Service Taxes (DST), GATS, Unilateral taxes, Digitalized economy, Destinationbased taxes, National treatment, Most-favoured-nation principle, Non-discrimination of services and service providers
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当国际贸易法与税收政策相遇:以数字服务税为例
随着数字服务税(DST)在世界各地的兴起,人们对其与国际贸易法的兼容性提出了质疑。2019年至2021年间,美国启动了对几项DST的调查,并发表了对奥地利、法国、意大利、印度、西班牙、土耳其和英国采用的DST的观察结果。除了认为这些税收违反了国际税收原则之外,美国还认为这些税收具有歧视性。本文以这一主张为基础,分析DST不符合世界贸易组织(WTO)法律的可能性。首先,它概述了缓解数字化经济挑战的单边、区域和多边税收提案。第二,它讨论了世贸组织法律可能产生的主要法律问题,重点是《服务贸易总协定》下的法律问题。虽然承认反对DST可能有很好的税收政策理由,但本文得出结论,基于世贸组织法律的论点提供了反对此类税收的微弱理由。数字服务税(DST)、《服贸总协定》、单边税、数字化经济、基于目的地的税收、国民待遇、最惠国原则、不歧视服务和服务提供商
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Test Data Protection in China-US Trade War: Integrating Empirical and Normative Analysis The WTO and Using Digital Economy Technologies: Surviving the Race With Preferential Trade Agreements A Tale of Too Little: Anti-dumping Tariff Between SAFTA Contracting Parties Game Analysis of Different Source Disclosure Model for Genetic Resources and Implications for China Improving Export Credit Agency Impact Through Full Faith and Credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1