Does trade openness improve the quality of domestic institutions? Evidence from Africa

Equilibrium Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.24136/eq.2022.030
Tereza Němečková, A. Hayat
{"title":"Does trade openness improve the quality of domestic institutions? Evidence from Africa","authors":"Tereza Němečková, A. Hayat","doi":"10.24136/eq.2022.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research background: The research article deals with impacts of international trade openness on institutions in less developed economies, namely in Africa.\nPurpose of the article: It investigates the impacts of international trade openness on institutional quality in Africa measured by twelve various variables.\nMethods: It applies generalized methods of moments to a dynamic panel data of 34 African countries in the period of 1988?2012. Institutional quality data come from International Country Risk Guide, the rest from World Development Indicators and UNESCO databases.\nFindings & value added: Our results indicate that in the case of Africa, trade openness seems to be a positive and significant determinant of institutional quality, however, it differs across various institutional variables. Trade openness brings a positive impact on government stability, bureaucracy and law and order, we also identify its conflict-mitigating effects. This happens, unfortunately, with an exemption for natural resources exports. Trade openness also positively influences security and socioeconomic conditions, although we find the link much weaker. Regarding our control variables, we find two interesting results. First, GDP per capita has a strong and positive association with institutional quality when measured by one bundled indicator, however, individual variables show different intensities. Second, we find a strong and positive association of net foreign direct investment inflows and government stability. The added value of this research lies not only in focus on the less researched relationship, i.e., how trade impacts the institutional quality, but dominantly in focus on many institutional variables at once and comparison of their effects. Other empirical studies usually focus on selected variables only, or on selected trade items (natural resources).","PeriodicalId":84667,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research background: The research article deals with impacts of international trade openness on institutions in less developed economies, namely in Africa. Purpose of the article: It investigates the impacts of international trade openness on institutional quality in Africa measured by twelve various variables. Methods: It applies generalized methods of moments to a dynamic panel data of 34 African countries in the period of 1988?2012. Institutional quality data come from International Country Risk Guide, the rest from World Development Indicators and UNESCO databases. Findings & value added: Our results indicate that in the case of Africa, trade openness seems to be a positive and significant determinant of institutional quality, however, it differs across various institutional variables. Trade openness brings a positive impact on government stability, bureaucracy and law and order, we also identify its conflict-mitigating effects. This happens, unfortunately, with an exemption for natural resources exports. Trade openness also positively influences security and socioeconomic conditions, although we find the link much weaker. Regarding our control variables, we find two interesting results. First, GDP per capita has a strong and positive association with institutional quality when measured by one bundled indicator, however, individual variables show different intensities. Second, we find a strong and positive association of net foreign direct investment inflows and government stability. The added value of this research lies not only in focus on the less researched relationship, i.e., how trade impacts the institutional quality, but dominantly in focus on many institutional variables at once and comparison of their effects. Other empirical studies usually focus on selected variables only, or on selected trade items (natural resources).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易开放是否提高了国内制度的质量?来自非洲的证据
研究背景:本文研究的是国际贸易开放对欠发达经济体(即非洲)制度的影响。本文的目的:通过12个不同的变量来研究国际贸易开放对非洲制度质量的影响。方法:采用广义矩量法对非洲34个国家1988 ~ 2012年的动态面板数据进行分析。机构质量数据来自《国际国家风险指南》,其余数据来自《世界发展指标》和教科文组织数据库。研究结果和增加值:我们的研究结果表明,在非洲的情况下,贸易开放似乎是制度质量的一个积极和重要的决定因素,然而,它在不同的制度变量之间有所不同。贸易开放对政府稳定、官僚主义和法律秩序产生积极影响,并具有缓解冲突的作用。不幸的是,这种情况发生在自然资源出口豁免的情况下。贸易开放也对安全和社会经济条件产生积极影响,尽管我们发现这种联系要弱得多。关于我们的控制变量,我们发现了两个有趣的结果。首先,当用一个捆绑指标衡量时,人均GDP与制度质量有很强的正相关关系,但各个变量表现出不同的强度。其次,我们发现净外国直接投资流入与政府稳定之间存在强烈的正相关关系。本研究的附加价值不仅在于关注研究较少的关系,即贸易如何影响制度质量,而且主要在于同时关注多个制度变量并比较它们的影响。其他实证研究通常只关注选定的变量,或选定的贸易项目(自然资源)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of bequest taxation on savings and transfers Barriers to immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis of the Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Germany employing the DEMATEL approach Google and Apple mobility data as predictors for European tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic: A neural network approach The impact of organizational resilience on the quality of public services: Application of structural equation modeling Relationships between road transport indicators and expenditure of visitors in the context of European countries' tourism competitiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1