The Place of Past Events in International Information Wars

Alvydas Nikžentaitis
{"title":"The Place of Past Events in International Information Wars","authors":"Alvydas Nikžentaitis","doi":"10.30965/25386565-02301006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an analysis of the role memory culture plays in information wars. Based on the examples of Lithuania, Russia, Ukraine, Poland and Belarus, it finds that the phenomenon of using the past in information wars can be explained as a fighting measure to entrench the authority of a given country in the eyes of the global community. This requirement emerged among countries in this region following the collapse of the old global systems and with the creation of new political blocs. Associations have been noticed between information wars that exploit the past and the growth of a country’s economic potential. For this reason, this foreign policy tool has not been used to the same degree in different countries in the region, nor did it start being used at the same time. Almost all the countries in the region started to massively exploit the past as a means of soft power only in the 21st century. This tool is especially significant in Poland and Russia, being used less often in Lithuania and Ukraine, and hardly at all in Belarus. The storylines of the past being used in information wars can be divided into two categories: Global identities, whose symbols have become Holocaust and Gulag figures; and symbols associated with the memory cultures and identities of separate societies, such as the idea of Slavic unity (in Russian-Ukrainian relations) or the past of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (in Lithuanian-Belarusian relations). The author predicts that the use of the past in information wars is set to intensify in the future, and as such, the teaching of expert skills is necessary to address this; at present, these skills are lacking in countries in the region.","PeriodicalId":39190,"journal":{"name":"Lithuanian historical studies / Lithuanian Institute of History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.30965/25386565-02301006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithuanian historical studies / Lithuanian Institute of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/25386565-02301006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the role memory culture plays in information wars. Based on the examples of Lithuania, Russia, Ukraine, Poland and Belarus, it finds that the phenomenon of using the past in information wars can be explained as a fighting measure to entrench the authority of a given country in the eyes of the global community. This requirement emerged among countries in this region following the collapse of the old global systems and with the creation of new political blocs. Associations have been noticed between information wars that exploit the past and the growth of a country’s economic potential. For this reason, this foreign policy tool has not been used to the same degree in different countries in the region, nor did it start being used at the same time. Almost all the countries in the region started to massively exploit the past as a means of soft power only in the 21st century. This tool is especially significant in Poland and Russia, being used less often in Lithuania and Ukraine, and hardly at all in Belarus. The storylines of the past being used in information wars can be divided into two categories: Global identities, whose symbols have become Holocaust and Gulag figures; and symbols associated with the memory cultures and identities of separate societies, such as the idea of Slavic unity (in Russian-Ukrainian relations) or the past of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (in Lithuanian-Belarusian relations). The author predicts that the use of the past in information wars is set to intensify in the future, and as such, the teaching of expert skills is necessary to address this; at present, these skills are lacking in countries in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际信息战中的历史事件
本文分析了记忆文化在信息战中的作用。本文以立陶宛、俄罗斯、乌克兰、波兰和白俄罗斯为例,发现在信息战中利用过去的现象可以解释为在国际社会眼中巩固特定国家权威的一种战斗措施。随着旧的全球体系的崩溃和新的政治集团的建立,本区域各国之间出现了这一要求。人们已经注意到,利用过去的信息战与一个国家经济潜力的增长之间存在关联。因此,这一外交政策工具在该地区不同国家的使用程度不同,也不是同时开始使用的。该地区几乎所有国家都是在21世纪才开始大规模利用过去作为软实力的手段。这个工具在波兰和俄罗斯尤其重要,在立陶宛和乌克兰使用得较少,在白俄罗斯几乎不使用。过去在信息战中使用的故事情节可以分为两类:全球身份,其象征已成为大屠杀和古拉格的人物;以及与不同社会的记忆文化和身份相关的符号,例如斯拉夫统一的想法(在俄罗斯与乌克兰的关系中)或立陶宛大公国的过去(在立陶宛与白俄罗斯的关系中)。作者预测,在未来的信息战中,对过去的使用将会加剧,因此,专家技能的教学是解决这一问题的必要条件;目前,该区域各国缺乏这些技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vasilijus Safronovas, Klaipėdos miesto istorija, Klaipėda Mažosios Lietuvos istorijos muziejus, 2021. 304 p. ISBN 978-609-9603-21-6 Kamil Frejlich, Pod przysądem horodnictwa wileńskiego. O jurydyce i jej mieszkańcach w XVII wieku, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2022. 336 p. ISBN 978-83-231-4694-0 Silvia Foti, The Nazi’s Granddaughter: How I Discovered my Grandfather was a War Criminal, Washington: Regnery History, 2021. 376 p. ISBN 978- 1684-511-08-2/Silvia Foti, Vėtra Lietaus šalyje: Jono Noreikos anūkės pasakojimas, Vilnius: Kitos knygos, 2022. 344 p. ISBN 978-609-4275-15-9 Larry Wolff, Woodrow Wilson and the Reimagining of Eastern Europe, Stanford University Press, 2020. 304 p. ISBN 978-1503-611-18-4, 978-1503-611-19-1 The Commemoration of the 40th Anniversary of the Kražiai Massacre in Lithuania and Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1