Making sense of sensory brand experience: Constructing an integrative framework for future research

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12270
Dongmei Zha, Pantea Foroudi, Zhongqi Jin, T.C. Melewar
{"title":"Making sense of sensory brand experience: Constructing an integrative framework for future research","authors":"Dongmei Zha,&nbsp;Pantea Foroudi,&nbsp;Zhongqi Jin,&nbsp;T.C. Melewar","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study asserts that conceptualizing sensory brand experience (SBE) as an independent construct is critical to expanding our understanding of experiences provided by brands. To achieve this goal, a rigorous examination of its foundational knowledge structure underpinning the construct is urgently required. Using co-citation analysis examining 151 SBE-related articles with 4038 citations over more than two decades (1994–2019), six knowledge fields deemed to have constitutive influence on SBE literature have been identified: atmospherics, product evaluation, sensory marketing, service marketing, experiential marketing and brand experience. Combining the results of a hierarchical cluster analysis and a metric multidimensional scaling analysis, the authors located three fundamental premises: (1) brand settings are arbiters of brand meaning; (2) the intrinsic processing of SBE involves the entrainment of exteroceptive and interoceptive processes; and (3) SBE outcomes are non-representational. At the end of the paper, these findings are organized into an integrative framework, highlighting research concerns and research gaps at the antecedent, processing and outcome stages. In doing so, this paper contributes to the conceptual development of SBE by constructing a doctrinal schema for future research undertakings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ijmr.12270","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

This study asserts that conceptualizing sensory brand experience (SBE) as an independent construct is critical to expanding our understanding of experiences provided by brands. To achieve this goal, a rigorous examination of its foundational knowledge structure underpinning the construct is urgently required. Using co-citation analysis examining 151 SBE-related articles with 4038 citations over more than two decades (1994–2019), six knowledge fields deemed to have constitutive influence on SBE literature have been identified: atmospherics, product evaluation, sensory marketing, service marketing, experiential marketing and brand experience. Combining the results of a hierarchical cluster analysis and a metric multidimensional scaling analysis, the authors located three fundamental premises: (1) brand settings are arbiters of brand meaning; (2) the intrinsic processing of SBE involves the entrainment of exteroceptive and interoceptive processes; and (3) SBE outcomes are non-representational. At the end of the paper, these findings are organized into an integrative framework, highlighting research concerns and research gaps at the antecedent, processing and outcome stages. In doing so, this paper contributes to the conceptual development of SBE by constructing a doctrinal schema for future research undertakings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感官品牌体验的意义:构建未来研究的整合框架
本研究认为,将感官品牌体验(SBE)概念化为一个独立的概念,对于扩大我们对品牌提供的体验的理解至关重要。为了实现这一目标,迫切需要对其基础知识结构进行严格的检查。通过共被引分析,研究了20多年来(1994-2019)151篇与SBE相关的文章,共被引4038次,确定了6个被认为对SBE文献具有构成影响的知识领域:氛围、产品评价、感官营销、服务营销、体验营销和品牌体验。结合层次聚类分析和度量多维尺度分析的结果,作者确定了三个基本前提:(1)品牌设置是品牌意义的仲裁者;(2) SBE的内在加工包括外感受过程和内感受过程的夹带;(3) SBE结果不具有代表性。在论文的最后,这些发现被组织成一个综合框架,突出了研究关注和研究差距在前事,处理和结果阶段。在此基础上,本文为未来的研究工作构建了一个理论图式,从而有助于SBE概念的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Digital‐sustainable business models: Definition, systematic literature review, integrative framework and research agenda from a strategic management perspective Open strategy and digital transformation: A framework and future research agenda Explaining differences in internationalization between emerging and developed economy born global firms: A systematic literature review and the way forward The ‘Paternal body’: Reviewing the corporeal impact of new fatherhood on employed men A telo‐centric approach to rethink grand challenges: Digital wellbeing as an example
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1