Micro-computed tomography assessment of triple antibiotic paste removal using different irrigation methods

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Oral Research Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI:10.26650/eor.2022200002
Esma Sarıçam, Selen İnce Yusufoğlu, M. Küçük, F. Geneci, Mert Ocak, H. Çelik
{"title":"Micro-computed tomography assessment of triple antibiotic paste removal using different irrigation methods","authors":"Esma Sarıçam, Selen İnce Yusufoğlu, M. Küçük, F. Geneci, Mert Ocak, H. Çelik","doi":"10.26650/eor.2022200002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study aimed to compare four irrigation methods for triple antibiotic paste (TAP) removal using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Materials and methods: Forty bovine central incisor teeth were selected, and the root canals were prepared up to #6 Peeso reamer drills. Equal portions of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline were used for the TAP preparation. The TAP was prepared by mixing the powder with distilled water (with a powder to liquid ratio of 1 mg/1 mL). The TAP was introduced to the canals with a lentulo spiral; then, the access cavities were temporarily sealed. After 21 days of storage, the teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups according to irrigation techniques: open-ended, side-vented, double side-vented needle irrigations and EndoActivator irrigation device. The TAP was removed using 17% EDTA (20 mL) and distilled water (5 mL) for all of the groups. The volume of the intracanal medicament before and after the irrigation procedure was recorded by scanning the samples with micro-CT, and the TAP percentage was calculated. The percentages obtained from each group were compared using ANOVA. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference among the TAP percentage volumes removed by the different irrigation techniques. Conclusion: The irrigation techniques used in this study showed similar TAP removal efficiency, however, they could not completely remove the TAP from the root canal systems.","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"56 1","pages":"49 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022200002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to compare four irrigation methods for triple antibiotic paste (TAP) removal using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Materials and methods: Forty bovine central incisor teeth were selected, and the root canals were prepared up to #6 Peeso reamer drills. Equal portions of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline were used for the TAP preparation. The TAP was prepared by mixing the powder with distilled water (with a powder to liquid ratio of 1 mg/1 mL). The TAP was introduced to the canals with a lentulo spiral; then, the access cavities were temporarily sealed. After 21 days of storage, the teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups according to irrigation techniques: open-ended, side-vented, double side-vented needle irrigations and EndoActivator irrigation device. The TAP was removed using 17% EDTA (20 mL) and distilled water (5 mL) for all of the groups. The volume of the intracanal medicament before and after the irrigation procedure was recorded by scanning the samples with micro-CT, and the TAP percentage was calculated. The percentages obtained from each group were compared using ANOVA. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference among the TAP percentage volumes removed by the different irrigation techniques. Conclusion: The irrigation techniques used in this study showed similar TAP removal efficiency, however, they could not completely remove the TAP from the root canal systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同冲洗方法去除三种抗生素糊剂的显微计算机断层扫描评价
目的:本研究旨在通过微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)分析比较四种冲洗方法去除三重抗生素糊剂(TAP)。材料和方法:选择40颗牛中切牙,用6号皮氏扩孔钻预备根管。TAP制剂使用等量的甲硝唑、环丙沙星和米诺环素。TAP是通过将粉末与蒸馏水(粉末与液体的比例为1mg/1mL)混合来制备的。TAP被引入到具有lentulo螺旋的运河中;然后,进入腔被临时密封。储存21天后,根据冲洗技术将牙齿随机分为四组:开放式、侧排式、双侧排式针头冲洗和EndoActivator冲洗装置。使用17%EDTA(20mL)和蒸馏水(5mL)去除所有组的TAP。用微型CT扫描样本,记录冲洗程序前后肛门内药物的体积,并计算TAP百分比。使用ANOVA对每组获得的百分比进行比较。显著性水平设定为p<0.05。结果:不同灌溉技术对TAP去除率的影响无统计学意义。结论:本研究中使用的灌溉技术显示出相似的TAP去除效率,但它们不能完全去除根管系统中的TAP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study. Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of (6)-shogaol on alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis. Comparative evaluation of digital radiography, electronic apex locator and simultaneous working length determination on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of c-shaped canal morphology in mandibular premolar teeth The effect of three different primary teeth rotary instrument systems on the amount of apically extruded debris in pulpectomy of primary teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1